Securitization, liquidity, and the Brady plan

1999 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 423-442
Author(s):  
William Miles
Keyword(s):  
Challenge ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 39-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shafiqul Islam
Keyword(s):  

1990 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter B Kenen

In March 1989, the new U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, Nicholas Brady, endorsed a change in strategy for dealing with developing country debt, calling for a three-year waiver of clauses in existing loan agreements that stand in the way of debt reduction “to accelerate sharply the pace of debt reduction and pass the benefits directly to the debtor nations,” and called on the IMF and World Bank to use some of their policy-based lending to aid the debt-reducing process. Events moved rapidly thereafter. Is there anything left to argue about? Unhappily, yes. Advocates of debt relief, like myself, maintain that the Brady plan will not go far enough. It relies too heavily on debtors and creditors to strike mutually beneficial bargains; it does not provide enough resources to generate the deep debt reductions that debtors need to solve their problems; and it does not shift risk forthrightly enough from private lenders to official creditors. I would correct the defects of the Brady plan by creating a new international institution to manage and finance the debt-reducing process or assign the task to an existing institution but give it enough resources to get the job done.


1991 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sweder van Wijnbergen ◽  
Mervyn King ◽  
Richard Portes
Keyword(s):  

2022 ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Edwin M. Truman

The Latin American debt crisis consumed the 1980s and was not restricted to Latin America. Starting from the August 1982 Mexican weekend, the crisis had three phases: Concerted Lending (1982-5), Baker Plan (1985-9) and Brady Plan (1989 to mid 1990s). This article describes the evolution of the debt strategy and the road to embracing debt write-downs at the end of the decade. In the absence of an external coordinating mechanism, four groups of parties had to reach agreement on any change in the strategy: the borrowing countries, their commercial bank lenders, the home-country authorities of those lenders, and the International Monetary Fund as the principal international institution. Each group could effectively veto any change in the strategy. This need for consensus is lesson number one from the 1980s for today. Lesson number two is that political economy aspects dictated that the strategy be implemented on a case-by-case basis. The article concludes with an application of these lessons to a similar, but even more global, potential debt crisis in the wake of the COVID pandemic.


1992 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 645-678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Suter ◽  
Hanspeter Stamm

The settlement of the external debt of insolvent sovereign borrowers has become one of the most important issues in relations between the north and south since the outbreak of the global debt crisis in the early 1980s. For the past eight years representatives of governments and international organizations, bankers, and scientists have suggested several proposals and plans to solve the present debt crisis. The most prominent schemes in this respect are the Baker Plan of 1985, which suggested massive new credits for the most highly indebted developing countries, and the recently adopted Brady Plan, which proposes partial debt discounts and reductions in interest rates. Both of these debt settlement proposals were initiated by the United States and are supported by the other principal creditor countries. However, despite the ten years of crisis management, world leaders have not yet agreed upon a longterm solution to the current debt problems. In the history of the capitalist world economy, the current problems of coping with a global debt crisis do not represent a unique event. Rather, recent empirical studies demonstrate that sovereign borrowers have experienced many instances of debt-servicing difficulties during the past 150 years (Eichengreen and Portes 1986; White 1986; Eichengreen and Lindert 1989; Marichal 1989; Suter 1989).


IDS Bulletin ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-60
Author(s):  
Stephany Griffith Jones
Keyword(s):  

1991 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helmut Reisen
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document