scholarly journals A10 Coll 2-1 and coll 2-1 NO2 in OA patients before and after hip or knee replacement

2005 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. S16
2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 856.1-856
Author(s):  
C. Lao ◽  
D. Lees ◽  
D. White ◽  
R. Lawrenson

Background:Osteoarthritis of the hip and knee is one of the most common causes of reduced mobility. It also causes stiffness and pain. Opioids can offer pain relief but is usually used for severe acute pain caused by major trauma or surgery. The use of opioids for relief of chronic pain caused by arthritis has increased over the last few decades.[1]Objectives:This study aims to investigate the use of strong opiates for patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis before and after joint replacement surgery, over a 13 years period in New Zealand.Methods:This study included patients with osteoarthritis who underwent publicly funded primary hip and knee replacement surgeries in 2005-2017 in New Zealand. These records were identified from the National Minimum Dataset (NMD). They were cross referenced with the NZJR data to exclude the admissions not for primary hip or knee replacement surgeries. Patients without a diagnosis of osteoarthritis were excluded.The PHARMS dataset was linked to the NMD to identify the use of strong opiates before and after surgeries. The strong opiates available for community dispensing in New Zealand and included in this study are: dihydrocodeine, fentanyl, methadone, morphine, oxycodone and pethidine. Use of opiate within three months prior to surgery and within 12 months post-surgery were examined by gender, age group, ethnicity, Charlson Comorbidity Index score and year of surgery. Differences by subgroup was examined with Chi- square test. Logistic regression model was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratios of strong opiate use before and after surgery compared with no opiate use.Results:We identified 53,439 primary hip replacements and 50,072 primary knee replacements with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis. Of patients with hip osteoarthritis, 6,251 (11.7%) had strong opiate before hip replacement surgeries and 11,939 (22.3%) had opiate after surgeries. Of patients with knee osteoarthritis, 2,922 (5.8%) had strong opiate before knee replacement surgeries and 15,252 (30.5%) had opiate after surgeries.The probability of patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis having opiate decreased with age, increased with Charlson comorbidity index score, and increased over time both before and after surgeries. Male patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis were less likely to have opiate than female patients both before and after surgeries. New Zealand Europeans with hip and knee osteoarthritis were more likely to receive opiate than other ethnic groups prior to surgeries, but were less likely to have opiate than Asians post-surgeries.Patients who had opiate before surgeries were more likely to have opiate after surgeries than those who did not have opiate before surgeries. The odds ratio was 8.34 (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.87-8.84) for hip osteoarthritis and 11.94 (95% CI: 10.84-13.16) for knee osteoarthritis after adjustment for age, gender, ethnicity, year of surgery and Charlson comorbidity index score. Having opiate prior to surgeries also increased the probability of having opiate for 6 weeks or more after surgeries substantially. The adjusted odds ratio was 21.46 (95% CI: 19.74-23.31) for hip osteoarthritis and 27.22 (95% CI: 24.95-29.68) for knee osteoarthritis.Conclusion:Preoperative opiate holidays should be encouraged. Multiple strategies need to be used to develop analgesic plans that allow adequate rehabilitation, without precipitating a chronic opiate dependence. Clinicians would also benefit from clear guidelines for prescribing strong opiates.References:[1] Nguyen, L.C., D.C. Sing, and K.J. Bozic,Preoperative Reduction of Opioid Use Before Total Joint Arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty, 2016.31(9 Suppl): p. 282-7.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2016 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 463-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Genevieve Fleeton ◽  
Alison R. Harmer ◽  
Lillias Nairn ◽  
Jack Crosbie ◽  
Lyn March ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 601
Author(s):  
Akila Weerasekera ◽  
Erin Morrissey ◽  
Minhae Kim ◽  
Atreyi Saha ◽  
Yang Lin ◽  
...  

1977 ◽  
Vol &NA; (126) ◽  
pp. 196???202 ◽  
Author(s):  
MICHAEL C. COLLOPY ◽  
M. P. MURRAY ◽  
GENA M. GARDNER ◽  
ROBERT A. DIULIO ◽  
DONALD R. GORE

1994 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 816 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soo Ho Lee ◽  
Key Yong Kim ◽  
Woo Shin Cho ◽  
Dae Hyuk Moon ◽  
Yong Sun Cho ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tuomas J. Rajamäki ◽  
Pia A. Puolakka ◽  
Aki Hietaharju ◽  
Teemu Moilanen ◽  
Esa Jämsen

Abstract Background Analgesic drugs are recommended to treat pain caused by osteoarthritis, and joint replacement should decrease the need for them. We aimed to determine the user rates of analgesic drugs before and after joint replacement. Methods All patients who underwent a primary hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis from 2002 to 2013 in a region of 0.5 million people were identified. Patients with revision or other joint replacements during the study period (operation date +/− two years) were excluded, leaving 6238 hip replacements (5657 patients) and 7501 knee replacements (6791 patients) for analyses. Medication data were collected from a nationwide Drug Prescription Register and the prevalence (with its 95% confidence intervals) of acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), mild opioids, strong opioids, and medications used for neuropathic pain was calculated in three-month periods two years before and after surgery. Results Between two years and three months preoperatively, the proportion of patients who redeemed at least one type of analgesic drug increased from 28% (95% CI, 27–30%) to 48% (47–50%) on hip replacement patients and from 33% (32–34%) to 41% (40–42%) on knee replacement patients. Postoperatively, the proportions decreased to 23% (22–24%) on hip and to 30% (29–31%) on knee patients. Hip replacement patients used more NSAIDs (34% (32–35%) hip vs 26% (25–27%) knee, p < 0.001), acetaminophen (14% (13–15%) vs 12% (11–13%), p < 0.001), and mild opioids (14% (13–15%) vs 9% (8–9%), p < 0.001) than knee patients preoperatively, but postoperatively hip patients used less NSAIDs (12% (11–13%) vs 16% (15–16%), p < 0.001), acetaminophen (9% (8–10%) vs 11% (11–12%), p < 0.001), and mild opioids (5% (5–6%) vs 8% (7–8%), p < 0.001). Conclusion Use of analgesic drugs increases prior to joint replacement, and is reduced following surgery. However, a considerable proportion of patients continue to use analgesics in two-year follow-up.


2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (06) ◽  
pp. 484-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Howie ◽  
Timothy Foutz ◽  
Curtis Cathcart ◽  
Jeff Burmeister ◽  
Steve Budsberg

SummaryObjective: To investigate the relationship between tibiofemoral kinematics before and after total knee replacement (TKR) in vitro.Animals: Eight canine hemipelves.Methods: A modified Oxford Knee Rig was used to place cadaveric limbs through a range of passive motion allowing the kinematics of the stifle to be evaluated. Four measurements were performed: a control stage, followed by a cranial cruciate transection stage, then following TKR with the musculature intact stage, and finally TKR with removal of limb musculature stage. Joint angles and translations of the femur relative to the tibia, including flexion-extension versus adduction-abduction, flexion-extension versus internal-external rotation, as well as flexion-extension versus each translation (cranial-caudal and lateral-medial) were calculated.Results: Significant differences were identified in kinematic data from limbs following TKR implantation as compared to the unaltered stifle. The TKR resulted in significant decreases in external rotation of the stifle during flexion-extension compared to the limb prior to any intervention, as well as increasing the abduction. The TKR significantly increased the caudal translation of the femur relative to the tibia compared to the unaltered limb. When compared with the cranial cruciate ligament-transection stage, TKR significantly decreased the ratio of the external rotation to flexion.Discussion: All three test periods showed significant differences from the unaltered stifle. The TKR did not completely restore the normal kinematics of the stifle.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document