scholarly journals PNL1 CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS AND HEALTH OUTCOMES OF DISEASE MODIFYING TREATMENT (DMT) THAT DELAYS DISABILITY PROGRESSION IN RELAPSING/REMITTING-ONSET MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS: NOVA SCOTIA “REAL WORLD” EVIDENCE

2006 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. A79
Author(s):  
MG Brown ◽  
S Kirby ◽  
JD Fisk ◽  
IS Sketris ◽  
J Hoch ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 1241-1248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Bsteh ◽  
Julia Feige ◽  
Rainer Ehling ◽  
Michael Auer ◽  
Harald Hegen ◽  
...  

Background: Stable disease course may prompt consideration of disease-modifying treatment (DMT) discontinuation in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Objective: To investigate the clinical outcome after DMT discontinuation and to identify predictive factors supporting decision-making. Methods: We included 221 RRMS patients, who discontinued DMT after ⩾12 months and had documented follow-up ⩾2 years after discontinuation. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) regarding relapse and disability progression after DMT discontinuation were calculated from Cox regression models. Results: Age >45 years at discontinuation (HR = 0.47, CI = 0.23–0.95, p = 0.038), absence of relapses for ⩾4 years on DMT before discontinuation (HR = 0.29, CI = 0.10–0.82, p = 0.020) and absence of contrast enhancing lesions (HR = 0.46, CI = 0.28–0.78, p = 0.004) were independent predictors of absence of relapse after discontinuation. Age >45 years and absence of relapses ⩾4 years on DMT combined had an HR of 0.06 (CI = 0.01–0.44, p < 0.001). Higher Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) at discontinuation, age >45 years and longer disease duration were significantly associated with disability progression after discontinuation. Conclusion: While freedom from further disease activity is generally unpredictable, there is a subset of patients (age ⩾45 years, DMT intake ⩾4 years without evidence of clinical or radiological disease activity) having a high likelihood of remaining relapse-free after DMT discontinuation. However, close clinical monitoring for recurrent disease activity is mandatory after discontinuing treatment.


2021 ◽  
pp. 135245852110196
Author(s):  
Jan Hillert ◽  
Jon A Tsai ◽  
Mona Nouhi ◽  
Anna Glaser ◽  
Tim Spelman

Background: Teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) are first-line disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis with similar labels that are used in comparable populations. Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness and persistence of teriflunomide and DMF in a Swedish real-world setting. Methods: All relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients in the Swedish MS registry initiating teriflunomide or DMF were included in the analysis. The primary endpoint was treatment persistence. Propensity score matching was used to adjust comparisons for baseline confounders. Results: A total of 353 teriflunomide patients were successfully matched to 353 DMF. There was no difference in the rate of overall treatment discontinuation by treatment group across the entire observation period (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.12; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.91–1.39; p = 0.277; reference = teriflunomide). Annualised relapse rate (ARR) was comparable ( p = 0.237) between DMF (0.07; 95% CI = 0.05–0.10) and teriflunomide (0.09; 95% CI = 0.07–0.12). There was no difference in time to first on-treatment relapse (HR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.50–1.21), disability progression (HR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.27–1.12) or confirmed improvement (HR = 1.17; 95% CI = 0.57–2.36). Conclusion: This population-based real-world study reports similarities in treatment persistence, clinical effectiveness and quality of life outcomes between teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document