scholarly journals PIH52 TARGETED COMMUNITY OUTREACH REDUCES OUT-OF-POCKET PRESCRIPTION DRUG COSTS OF MEDICARE PART D BENEFICIARIES

2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. A171
Author(s):  
MR Stebbins ◽  
RA Patel ◽  
TW Cutler ◽  
AR Smith ◽  
S Shimomura ◽  
...  
Diabetes Care ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 502-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoon Jeong Choi ◽  
Haomiao Jia ◽  
Tal Gross ◽  
Katie Weinger ◽  
Patricia W. Stone ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 275-275
Author(s):  
Sheetal Mehta Kircher ◽  
Michael Johansen ◽  
Matthew M. Davis

275 Background: Medicare Part D was designed to reduce out of pocket (OOP) costs for Medicare beneficiaries, but the extent to which this occurred for patients with cancer has not been measured. The aim of this study is to quantify the impact of Part D eligibility on OOP cost for prescription drugs and utilization for cancer patients. Methods: Differences-in-differences analyses were used to estimate the effects of Medicare Part D eligibility on OOP drug costs, by comparing 4 year periods before and after Part D implementation. Analyses were based on data from the publicly available Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, a nationally representative, all-payer sample of the United States non-institutionalized civilian population. Our analysis compared per-capita OOP burden between Medicare beneficiaries (age 65+) with cancer to near-elderly individuals age 55-64 years old with cancer. Results: 2,077 near-elderly individuals with cancer and 4,723 individuals with Medicare and cancer were included (total n=6,800), representing over 85 million people. Prescription drug coverage increased among individuals with Medicare from before Part D (39%) to after (65%); in contrast, prescription drug coverage among the near-elderly remained stable before vs. after Part D (82.4% vs. 81.4%). The mean per-capita OOP cost for Medicare beneficiaries with cancer before Part D was $1,111 (SE ±45) and decreased to $694 (±35) after implementation of Medicare Part D—a decline of 37%. Compared with changes in OOP drug costs for non-elderly patients with cancer over the same period, implementation of Medicare Part D was associated with a further reduction of $286 per person. OOP costs for cancer-associated drugs (i.e., antineoplastic, pain medications, anti-emetics) accounted for 6.5-11.1% of the total OOP cost with no significant trends between 2002-2010. Conclusions: The implementation of Medicare D has significantly reduced OOP prescription drug costs for seniors with cancer, beyond trends observed for younger patients. Considering prescription drugs for all medical conditions, cancer associated drugs compose a minority of the cost, highlighting that cancer patients have many comorbid conditions contributing to overall costs.


2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Zimmer

Purpose – The US Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 introduced optional prescription drug coverage, beginning in 2006, widely known as Medicare Part D. This paper uses up-to-date nationally representative survey data to investigate the impact of Part D not only on drug spending and consumption, but also on the composition of drug consumption. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – Specifically, the paper investigates whether Part D impacted the number of therapeutic classes for which drugs were prescribed, and also whether Part D lead to increased usage of drugs for specific medical conditions that typically receive drug-intensive therapies. Findings – In addition to confirming findings from previous studies, this paper shows that Part D increased the number of therapeutic classes to which seniors receive drugs by approximately four classes. Part D also lead to increased usage of drugs used to treat upper respiratory disease, hypertension, and diabetes. Originality/value – While mostly concurring with previous studies on the spending impacts of Part D, this paper is the first to shed light on other impacts of Part D, specifically with respect to its impact on therapeutic classes for which drugs are prescribed.


Medical Care ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 49 (9) ◽  
pp. 834-841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Becky A. Briesacher ◽  
Yanfang Zhao ◽  
Jeanne M. Madden ◽  
Fang Zhang ◽  
Alyce S. Adams ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sarah A Spinler ◽  
Mark J Cziraky ◽  
Paul S Chan ◽  
Feng-ming Tang ◽  
Gladys G Duenas ◽  
...  

Background: Medication Therapy Management (MTM) is a mandated component of Medicare Part D whereby a pharmacist-patient encounter identifies, resolves and prevents medication-related problems. MTM programs have been shown to improve drug therapy goal attainment while reducing overall costs in cardiac patients; however, MTM has been greatly underutilized. The purpose of this study is to identify the proportion of patients eligible for MTM from those enrolled in the NCDR's outpatient PINNACLE Registry. Methods: MTM eligibility is based on the presence of multiple chronic diseases and medications plus the likelihood of exceeding an annual drug cost threshold ($4000 in 2009 and $3000 in 2010). Patients from PINNACLE (5/1/08 to 9/30/10) with 3 or more of the following diseases were identified: HTN, HF, dyslipidemia, DM, CAD. Patient demographics, cardiac diseases, and cardiac drug classes prescribed (individual drugs not available) were captured. To estimate individual patient drug costs to determine MTM eligibility, a weighted average cost was calculated using nationally representative drug utilization data and average wholesale prices (AWP). Sensitivity analyses for determining MTM eligibility were performed by varying drug costs using AWP for the highest cost and clinician-defined most frequently prescribed drugs in each class. Results: Of the 160,593 Medicare patients enrolled in PINNACLE, 93,089 (58%) were identified with ≥ 3 cardiac diseases. The cohort’s mean age was 74.4 ± 9.2 yrs, 54.4% were male and 86.5% were white. Patients were prescribed a mean of 3.5 cardiac drugs. The table displays drug costs and MTM eligibility results. Conclusions: A substantial number of patients met MTM eligibility requirements with this conservative approach using only cardiac drug costs, although variability existed based on cost method. These data serve to raise cardiologists' awareness of their patients' potential eligibility to receive the benefits of MTM services. Cost Methodology Median Annual Cost (IQR) 2009 MTM Eligibility [N (%)] 2010 MTM Eligibility [N (%)] Weighed average cost $1329 (915,2609) 6,202 (6.7% ) 19,903 (21.4%) Frequently prescribed cost $366 (193,1361) 1084 (1.2% ) 7326 (7.9%) High cost $3,958 (2406,5358) 46,477 (49.9% ) 59,619 (64%) 2009 and 2010 MTM eligibility based on likelihood of exceeding drug cost threshold of $4000 and $3000, respectively. IQR - interquartile range; MTM - medication therapy management.


2008 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua E. Wilk ◽  
Joyce C. West ◽  
Donald S. Rae ◽  
Maritza Rubio-Stipec ◽  
Jennifer J. Chen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document