1192 Port catheters: the incidence of complications. A multicentric approach

2003 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. S365
Author(s):  
M. Vrebos ◽  
L. Rottiers ◽  
L. Goossens ◽  
M. Stas ◽  
G. Evers ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
pp. 369-374
Author(s):  
Hans-Heinrich Wolf ◽  
Karin Jordan ◽  
Christof Kramm

2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria Salazar ◽  
Kalpana Yeddula ◽  
Stephan Wicky ◽  
Ramhi Oklu ◽  
Suvranu Ganguli ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 111-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
De-Hua Chang ◽  
Kamal Mammadov ◽  
Tilman Hickethier ◽  
Jan Borggrefe ◽  
Martin Hellmich ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre-Yves Marcy ◽  
Andrea Figl ◽  
Antoine Ianessi ◽  
Emmanuel Chamorey

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 876-881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Premal Amrishkumar Patel ◽  
Dimitri A. Parra ◽  
Ramnik Bath ◽  
Joao G. Amaral ◽  
Michael J. Temple ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Yves Marcy ◽  
Alexis Lacout ◽  
Juliette Thariat ◽  
Andrea Figl ◽  
Jacques Merckx

AbstractPurpose: Various venous access devices are available, including peripheral venous lines, peripherally inserted central catheters lines, and subcutaneous port catheters. The latter provides medium-to long-term venous access and includes medical devices that can be inserted either on the chest (chest ports) or in the arm (arm ports). We report the techniques, dedicated indications, and main complications of arm port insertion using the ultrasonography (US) guidance method.Methods: Tips and tricks of percutaneous real-time US-guided vein access technique in the arm are reviewed, and a brief literature review is reported.Results: Technical feasibility is almost 99%. US guidance allows depiction of anatomic variants, reduces the number of failed attempts, and increases the technical access rate compared with venography-guided access. Comparison of arm ports to chest ports reveals a higher global complication rate. We also report typical (mechanical) complications and dedicated indications, including contraindications to chest port insertion and selected patients for whom chest ports are not possible (eg, those with breast, head, and neck cancer; obesity; cosmesis; and requiring upright position).Conclusions: Arm port insertion under US guidance is safe and effective, and has dedicated indications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document