1406 ORAL Parotid gland sparing in paediatric patients receiving radiotherapy for infratentorial tumours: Optimization of treatment technique to improve normal tissue sparing

2007 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 179
Author(s):  
M. Lau ◽  
B.A. Millar
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-241
Author(s):  
Pubade Kaewpruk ◽  
Somvilai Chakrabandhu ◽  
Somsak Wanwilairat ◽  
Wannapha Nobnop

AbstractPurpose:To compare the dosimetric results regarding the sparing effect on normal tissue between RapidArc (RA) and helical tomotherapy (HT) plans for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients in cases of the equal target dose controls utilising two techniques.Materials and Methods:Thirteen NPC patients treated with HT were replanned using the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) for the RA plan. The target dose of the RA plan was optimised equally to the HT plan in terms of target coverage, dose conformity (CI) and dose homogeneity (HI) for assessing the normal tissue sparing between two techniques. All dose–volume parameters monitor units (MUs) and delivery time were also investigated.Results:All dosimetric parameter comparisons of organs-at-risk (OARs) between the RA and HT plans were not significantly different for brain stem, spinal cord and cochlea. However, the RA plan showed a significantly lower dose to the left parotid gland. The mean and median dose were significantly lower in the RA plan versus the HT plan by p-value 0·005 and 0·039, respectively. The MUs and delivery time were also significantly lower in the RA plan with a p-value of 0·00.Conclusions:With the same planning target volume coverage, homogeneity and conformity, almost all of RA and HT treatment planning met the planning goal for normal tissue sparing. There were no significant differences between the two techniques except in the left parotid gland. The RA plans were superior to HT plans by effectively reducing the MUs and treatment time.


2009 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 238-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jimmi Søndergaard ◽  
Morten Høyer ◽  
Jørgen B. Petersen ◽  
Pauliina Wright ◽  
Cai Grau ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-90
Author(s):  
Barbara Melles-Bencsik ◽  
Tamás Pócza ◽  
Tibor Major ◽  
Péter Ágoston ◽  
Kliton Jorgo ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 2578
Author(s):  
Mikaela Dell’Oro ◽  
Michala Short ◽  
Puthenparampil Wilson ◽  
Chia-Ho Hua ◽  
Melissa Gargone ◽  
...  

Background: Proton radiotherapy produces superior dose distributions compared to photon radiotherapy, reducing side effects. Differences between the two modalities are not fully quantified in paediatric patients for various intracranial tumour sites or age. Understanding these differences may help clinicians estimate the benefit and improve referral across available centres. Our aim was to compare intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and intensity-modulated photon radiotherapy (IMRT) radiation doses for select paediatric intracranial tumours. Methods: IMPT and IMRT dose distributions for gender-matched paediatric cranial CT-datasets (ages 5, 9 and 13 years) were retrospectively calculated to simulate irradiation of supratentorial (ependymoma) and infratentorial (medulloblastoma) target volumes diameters (1–3 cm) and position (central and 1–2 cm shifts). Results: Clinical dosimetric objectives were achieved for all 216 treatment plans. Whilst infratentorial IMPT plans achieved greater maximum dose sparing to optic structures (4.8–12.6 Gy optic chiasm), brainstem sparing was limited (~0.5 Gy). Mean dose difference for optic chiasm was associated with medulloblastoma target position (p < 0.0197). Supratentorial IMPT plans demonstrated greater dose reduction for the youngest patients (pituitary gland p < 0.001). Conclusions: Normal tissue sparing was achieved regardless of patient age for infratentorial tumours. However, for supratentorial tumours, there was a dosimetric advantage of IMPT across 9 vs. 13-year-old patients.


2010 ◽  
Vol 183 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar Dawood ◽  
Colin Sims ◽  
John Dooley ◽  
Paul Meskell ◽  
Alan Katz ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 47 (7) ◽  
pp. 1382-1389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauliina Wright ◽  
Anthony Thomas Redpath ◽  
Morten Høyer ◽  
Cai Grau ◽  
Ludvig Paul Muren

2006 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 276-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio Fiorino ◽  
Italo Dell'Oca ◽  
Alessio Pierelli ◽  
Sara Broggi ◽  
Elena De Martin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document