Recovery cycle of the masseter inhibitory reflex after magnetic stimulation in normal subjects

2003 ◽  
Vol 114 (7) ◽  
pp. 1253-1258 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Gastaldo ◽  
A Graziani ◽  
M Paiardi ◽  
R Quatrale ◽  
R Eleopra ◽  
...  
1984 ◽  
Vol 49 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 63-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Cruccu ◽  
R. Agostino ◽  
M. Fornarelli ◽  
M. Inghilleri ◽  
M. Manfredi

2005 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jen-Tse Chen ◽  
Yung-Yang Lin ◽  
Din-E Shan ◽  
Zin-An Wu ◽  
Mark Hallett ◽  
...  

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex can interrupt voluntary contralateral rhythmic limb movements. Using the method of “resetting index” (RI), our study investigated the TMS effect on different types of bimanual movements. Six normal subjects participated. For unimanual movement, each subject tapped either the right or left index finger at a comfortable rate. For bimanual movement, index fingers of both hands tapped in the same (in-phase) direction or in the opposite (antiphase) direction. TMS was applied to each hemisphere separately at various intensities from 0.5 to 1.5 times motor threshold (MT). TMS interruption of rhythm was quantified by RI. For the unimanual movements, TMS disrupted both contralateral and ipsilateral rhythmic hand movements, although the effect was much less in the ipsilateral hand. For the bimanual in-phase task, TMS could simultaneously reset the rhythmic movements of both hands, but the effect on the contralateral hand was less and the effect on the ipsilateral hand was more compared with the unimanual tasks. Similar effects were seen from right and left hemisphere stimulation. TMS had little effect on the bimanual antiphase task. The equal effect of right and left hemisphere stimulation indicates that neither motor cortex is dominant for simple bimanual in-phase movement. The smaller influence of contralateral stimulation and the greater effect of ipsilateral stimulation during bimanual in-phase movement compared with unimanual movement suggest hemispheric coupling. The antiphase movements were resistant to TMS disruption, and this suggests that control of rhythm differs in the 2 tasks. TMS produced a transient asynchrony of movements on the 2 sides, indicating that both motor cortices might be downstream of the clocking command or that the clocking is a consequence of the 2 hemispheres communicating equally with each other.


1992 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. 727-732 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.H. Groot ◽  
B.W. Ongerboer de Visser ◽  
J.P.R. van Merkesteyn ◽  
J.D. Speelman ◽  
J. Bras

2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 1605-1611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Torriero ◽  
Massimiliano Oliveri ◽  
Giacomo Koch ◽  
Carlo Caltagirone ◽  
Laura Petrosini

Increasing evidence suggests cerebellar involvement in procedural learning. To further analyze its role and to assess whether it has a lateralized influence, in the present study we used a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation interference approach in a group of normal subjects performing a serial reaction time task. We studied 36 normal volunteers: 13 subjects underwent repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the left cerebellum and performed the task with the right (6 subjects) or left (7 subjects) hand; 10 subjects underwent repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the right cerebellum and performed the task with the hand ipsilateral (5 subjects) or contralateral (5 subjects) to the stimulation; another 13 subjects served as controls and were not submitted to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; 7 of them performed the task with the right hand and 6 with the left hand. The main results show that interference with the activity of the lateral cerebellum induces a significant decrease of procedural learning: Interference with the right cerebellar hemisphere activity induces a significant decrease in procedural learning regardless of the hand used to perform the serial reaction time task, whereas left cerebellar hemisphere activity seems more linked with procedural learning through the ipsilateral hand. In conclusion, the present study shows for the first time that a transient interference with the functions of the cerebellar cortex results in an impairment of procedural learning in normal subjects and it provides new evidences for interhemispheric differences in the lateral cerebellum.


2002 ◽  
Vol 147 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenzano C. ◽  
Gilio F. ◽  
Inghilleri M. ◽  
Conte A. ◽  
Fofi L. ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 692-694
Author(s):  
Enrico Nastro Siniscalchi ◽  
Luciano Catalfamo ◽  
Salvatore Crimi ◽  
Francesca Rinaldo ◽  
Vincenzo Rizzo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document