1140 Categories of response to first line VEGF receptor targeted therapy and overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. e1140
Author(s):  
J.F. Busch ◽  
C. Seidel ◽  
I. Goranova ◽  
B. Erber ◽  
R. Peters ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 318-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Khambati ◽  
T. K. Choueiri ◽  
C. K. Kollmannsberger ◽  
S. North ◽  
G. A. Bjarnason ◽  
...  

318 Background: Targeted therapy has become the mainstay of treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The efficacy of this therapy on the older population is poorly understood. Methods: Data from patients with mRCC treated with first-line anti-VEGF therapy were collected through the International mRCC Database Consortium from 14 centers. Results: One thousand three hundred eighty-one patients were treated with targeted therapy as their first-line treatment. Of those, 144 (10%) were seventy-five years or older (median=78 years, range=75–89). Four percent of these individuals were favorable risk, 69% intermediate risk, and 27% poor risk as per Heng et al. JCO 2009 prognostic factors. There was no statistical difference in these prognostic groups between the older (≥75) and younger populations (<75) (p=0.1779). The initial treatment for those ≥ 75 years was with sunitinib (n=98), sorafenib (n=35), bevacizumab (n=7), and AZD2171 (n=4). The older population had fewer nephrectomies (71% vs. 80%, p=0.0133) and fewer brain metastases (3% vs. 9%, p=0.0128). Only 23% of older patients went on to receive second line therapy in comparison to 39% of the younger population (p<0.0001). The overall response rate, median treatment duration and overall survival for the older vs. younger group were 18% vs. 25% (p=0.0975), 5.5 months vs. 7.5 months (p=0.1388), and 16.8 months vs. 19.7 months (p=0.3321), respectively. When adjusted for known poor prognostic factors, age over 75 years was not found to be associated with poorer overall survival (HR 1.002, 95%CI 0.781–1.285) or shorter treatment duration (HR 1.018, 95%CI 0.827–1.252). Conclusions: Overall response rates, treatment duration, and overall survival rates are not different between the older and younger populations and age is not a prognostic factor. Thus, the decision to treat with targeted therapy should not depend on age alone. [Table: see text]


2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5024-5024 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Figlin ◽  
T. E. Hutson ◽  
P. Tomczak ◽  
M. D. Michaelson ◽  
R. M. Bukowski ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 505-505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumanta Kumar Pal ◽  
Magdaliz Gorritz ◽  
Steven A. Sherman ◽  
Zhimei Liu

505 Background: The treatment landscape for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has changed in recent years, with several targeted therapies becoming available for 1st and 2nd line use. The rapidly evolving treatment landscape has left physicians with an abundance of choices for the treatment of mRCC patients. This study aimed to understand whether this has resulted in varying treatment patterns across US regions in 1st and 2nd line targeted therapy for mRCC. Methods: RCC patients who initiated 1st line targeted therapy with a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/VEGF receptor (VEGFr) or mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor between January 1, 2004 and June 30, 2011 were identified in the MarketScan database. First-line therapy was defined as the first claim in the database for a targeted therapy. One drug claim was sufficient to establish a line of therapy and a new line was defined as switching to another agent. Treatment patterns in the 1st and 2nd line settings were assessed in patients who initiated 2ndtherapy line after FDA approval of everolimus (Ev) (March 30, 2009) and stratified by geographic region. Results: Of the 6,524 patients included in the study, 1,298 (36%) received a 2nd line targeted therapy after March 30, 2009. Although all possible permutations of treatment sequences were observed, overall, sunitinib (Su) and temsirolimus (Te) combined made up 80% to 83% of the 1st line regimens across regions. The most common sequence was Su->Ev, observed in 18% of patients in the North Central US to 31% in the Northeast; Su->Te was the next most common sequence in all regions. Among patients who received 1st line temsirolimus, the majority initiated 2ndline on either bevacizumab (Be) (7%-12%) or Su (6%-10%) across regions. Conclusions: The most common treatment sequences across all regions were Su->Ev and Su->Te. Although a consistent pattern of sequential therapy emerged across regions, a wide range of on- and off-label strategies was observed outside of the predominant pattern of care. Furthermore, very few patients in this study received additional targeted therapy after 1st line. Further research is needed to identify factors influencing these treatment strategies.


2016 ◽  
Vol 107 (7) ◽  
pp. 1013-1017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiaki Kawano ◽  
Wataru Takahashi ◽  
Masatoshi Eto ◽  
Tomomi Kamba ◽  
Hideaki Miyake ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document