A series of TCM theory based movements could accelerate ureteral stone passage after SWL

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. e2899
Author(s):  
J. Da ◽  
C. Yu ◽  
Y. Zhao ◽  
L. Chen ◽  
Z. Pan ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-165
Author(s):  
Mohammad Hadi Radfar ◽  
Reza Valipour ◽  
Behzad Narouie ◽  
Mehdi Sotoudeh ◽  
Hamid Pakmanesh

Introduction: Previous radiological studies revealed that stones lodge more frequently in the ureterovesical junction (UVJ) as well as the proximal ureter. Factors that prevent stone passage from the proximal ureter are not well studied. Aim: To explore the site of the lodged stones in the proximal ureter with direct observation during laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. Materials and methods: Between November 2014 and February 2015, we included 26 patients including 18 men and 8 women with stones larger than 10 millimeters in the proximal ureter who were candidate for laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. We prospectively recorded the site of the lodged stones in the ureter during laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in relation with the sites of ureteral stenosis as well as the gonadal vessels. Results: Among 26 patients with ureteral stone, in 19 cases stone was found close to the gonadal vein compared with seven cases that stone was in other locations of the ureter (p = 0.02). The characteristics of patients and stones were not different in cases that the stone was close to gonadal vessels compared with other locations. Conclusions: This study showed that most of the stones lodged in the proximal ureter were in close proximity with gonadal vessels. Gonadal vessels may be an extrinsic cause of ureteral narrowing.


2017 ◽  
Vol 197 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Portis ◽  
Jennifer Portis ◽  
Suzanne Neises

2017 ◽  
Vol 197 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishnu Ganesan ◽  
Michael Kattan ◽  
Christopher Loftus ◽  
Bryan Hinck ◽  
Daniel Greene ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

BMC Urology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nusret Can Cilesiz ◽  
Arif Ozkan ◽  
Arif Kalkanli ◽  
Ali Eroglu ◽  
Cem Tuğrul Gezmis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 277-283
Author(s):  
Nassib Abou Heidar ◽  
Muhieddine Labban ◽  
Gerges Bustros ◽  
Rami Nasr

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. e0260517
Author(s):  
Jee Soo Park ◽  
Dong Wook Kim ◽  
Dongu Lee ◽  
Taeju Lee ◽  
Kyo Chul Koo ◽  
...  

Objectives To develop a prediction model of spontaneous ureteral stone passage (SSP) using machine learning and logistic regression and compare the performance of the two models. Indications for management of ureteral stones are unclear, and the clinician determines whether to wait for SSP or perform active treatment, especially in well-controlled patients, to avoid unwanted complications. Therefore, suggesting the possibility of SSP would help make a clinical decision regarding ureteral stones. Methods Patients diagnosed with unilateral ureteral stones at our emergency department between August 2014 and September 2018 were included and underwent non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography 4 weeks from the first stone episode. Predictors of SSP were applied to build and validate the prediction model using multilayer perceptron (MLP) with the Keras framework. Results Of 833 patients, SSP was observed in 606 (72.7%). SSP rates were 68.2% and 75.6% for stone sizes 5–10 mm and <5 mm, respectively. Stone opacity, location, and whether it was the first ureteral stone episode were significant predictors of SSP. Areas under the curve (AUCs) for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for MLP, and logistic regression were 0.859 and 0.847, respectively, for stones <5 mm, and 0.881 and 0.817, respectively, for 5–10 mm stones. Conclusion SSP prediction models were developed in patients with well-controlled unilateral ureteral stones; the performance of the models was good, especially in identifying SSP for 5–10-mm ureteral stones without definite treatment guidelines. To further improve the performance of these models, future studies should focus on using machine learning techniques in image analysis.


2018 ◽  
Vol 199 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Kuebker ◽  
Jennifer Robles ◽  
Jordan Kramer ◽  
Nicole Miller ◽  
S. Duke Herrell ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document