Tentative suicide in a psychotic patient admitted to a general hospital: presentation of a case

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-110
Author(s):  
Verónica Prado Robles ◽  
Laura Ameneiro Romero
2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. S151-S152
Author(s):  
J.Á. Monforte Porto ◽  
A. San Román Uría ◽  
C. Llanes Álvarez ◽  
G. Humada Álvarez ◽  
I. Sevillano Benito ◽  
...  

BackgroundPatients with schizophrenia have a higher prevalence of physical illness and a higher mortality from natural causes than the general population, which is a reason why they can be hospitalized for medical and surgical pathologies.AimsTo determine the demand, the reason for consultation and the sociodemographic characteristics of the psychotic patient admitted at the general hospital.MethodsSociodemographic variables (age, sex, marital status, education, place of residence, residential housing, with who they live, work status) and health care (service of origin, type of request and its relevance, complaints, days of delay between the request and assistance, number of visits, average length of stay).Study designProspective epidemiological study of 80 psychotic patients (F.2 ICD-10), from the total of 906 consults solicited from 1 January 2012 until 31 December 2014. Bioethical considerations: compliance with these principles justice, non-maleficence, autonomy and beneficence.ResultsThe average age is 58.34 years old, 60% were male, 73.8% single, 81.3% with primary education, 52.5% living in urban areas; and the 88.8% of cases were pensioners. The Departments that generate a greater demand are Internal Medicine (53.8%), Orthopaedic Surgery (10%), Pneumology (8.8%) and ICU (8.8%). The most frequent reasons for consultation are assessment/treatment setting (77.5%), abnormal behavior (30%), disorientation (18.8%) and psychotic symptoms (18.8%).ConclusionsThe typical profile of psychotic patients hospitalized for medical-surgical diseases is a male, middle-aged, single, with primary education and pensioner; from whom it's sued consultation for adjusting of treatment, and secondly for abnormal behavior.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


Author(s):  
Ronald S. Weinstein ◽  
N. Scott McNutt

The Type I simple cold block device was described by Bullivant and Ames in 1966 and represented the product of the first successful effort to simplify the equipment required to do sophisticated freeze-cleave techniques. Bullivant, Weinstein and Someda described the Type II device which is a modification of the Type I device and was developed as a collaborative effort at the Massachusetts General Hospital and the University of Auckland, New Zealand. The modifications reduced specimen contamination and provided controlled specimen warming for heat-etching of fracture faces. We have now tested the Mass. General Hospital version of the Type II device (called the “Type II-MGH device”) on a wide variety of biological specimens and have established temperature and pressure curves for routine heat-etching with the device.


2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 34-34
Author(s):  
Viraj A. Master ◽  
Jennifer Young ◽  
Jack W. McAninch

1974 ◽  
Vol 134 (5) ◽  
pp. 828-828
Author(s):  
C. D. Aring
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document