Remarks by Mauricio Rodas

2020 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 364-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauricio Rodas

First of all, I want to thank the American Society of International Law, the Municipality of The Hague, and all of you for this invitation, I am delighted to be part of this great group of panelists speaking here today.

2020 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 362-364
Author(s):  
Penny Abeywardena

Janne thank you so much. First, it is a pleasure to be with this esteemed panel and I want to thank the American Society for International Law and the Municipality of The Hague for bringing us together today.


2020 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 345-357
Author(s):  
Peter D. Trooboff ◽  
Cara North ◽  
Yuko Nishitani ◽  
Shubha Sastry ◽  
Riccarda Chanda

On behalf of the American Society of International Law and as part of its first virtual annual meeting, I am pleased to welcome you to this panel on the promise and prospects of the 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters. As many of those listening know, the negotiations for this newest Hague Convention were concluded at the Hague Conference on Private International Law on July 2, 2019.


2006 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas M. Franck

The American Society of International Law (ASIL), incorporated by Act of Congress in 1950, was founded in 1906 “to promote the establishment and maintenance of international relations on the basis of law and justice.” As we celebrate the centennial of this, the Society’s principal publication, it is appropriate to examine the present and future prospects of this project. Is it still a compelling aspiration in the era of U.S. superpower-dom?The founding of the Society and initiation of the Journal (AJIL) must be seen in the context of the then-prevalent American commitment to the idea that a world of international law and international tribunals would be a natural, even historically inevitable, extrapolation of a good American idea. Speaking in 1890 to the first Pan-American Conference, President Benjamin Harrison congratulated the delegates on formulating a hemispheric arbitration agreement. “We rejoice,” he said, “that you have found in the organization of our Government something suggestive and worthy of imitation.” At The Hague in 1907, Secretary of State Elihu Root, the founding president of the ASIL, called for the creation of an international court “which would pass upon questions between nations with the same impartial and impersonal judgment that the Supreme Court of the United States gives to questions arising between citizens of the different States.”


2020 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 366-368
Author(s):  
Robert Lewis-Lettington

Thank you, Janne. Thank you to our hosts, the American Society for International Law, the City of The Hague, yourself, and the Asser Institute for making this possible.


1930 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 674-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hunter Miller

The Conference for the Codification of International Law which met at The Hague from March 13 to April 12, 1930, was the first international conference specifically called for that purpose.In 1924 the League of Nations set up a Committee of Experts for the progressive codification of international law. The task of that committee was to select and propose for the first conference on codification a certain number of subjects within the field of international law. Three subjects, namely, Nationality, Territorial Waters and The Responsibility of States for Damage Caused in Their Territory to the Person or Property of Foreigners, were finally agreed on as the subjects to be considered by the first conference.


2020 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 359-360
Author(s):  
Saskia Bruines

Ladies and Gentlemen, as Deputy Mayor of The Hague, I am glad that this esteemed panel will discuss the promise of cities in relation to international law. As a representative of the international city of peace and justice, this subject is of course close to my heart.


Author(s):  
Jin Sun ◽  
Qiong WU

Abstract In July 2019, the Hague Conference on Private International Law adopted the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters. As an outcome of the Judgments Project, this Convention will exert a great influence on the global circulation of foreign judgments. China attached great importance to the Judgments Project and participated in the full negotiation process. This paper is a reflection of some of the Chinese negotiators’ approaches in handling certain very difficult but important issues in the process, with the hope that it may shed some light on China’s negotiation practice and the principles it adheres to in the international law arena, which are fully in line with the principles of equity and justice, mutual benefit, and win-win outcome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document