scholarly journals NONCROSSING SETS AND A GRASSMANN ASSOCIAHEDRON

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
FRANCISCO SANTOS ◽  
CHRISTIAN STUMP ◽  
VOLKMAR WELKER

We study a natural generalization of the noncrossing relation between pairs of elements in$[n]$to$k$-tuples in$[n]$that was first considered by Petersenet al.[J. Algebra324(5) (2010), 951–969]. We give an alternative approach to their result that the flag simplicial complex on$\binom{[n]}{k}$induced by this relation is a regular, unimodular and flag triangulation of the order polytope of the poset given by the product$[k]\times [n-k]$of two chains (also called Gelfand–Tsetlin polytope), and that it is the join of a simplex and a sphere (that is, it is a Gorenstein triangulation). We then observe that this already implies the existence of a flag simplicial polytope generalizing the dual associahedron, whose Stanley–Reisner ideal is an initial ideal of the Grassmann–Plücker ideal, while previous constructions of such a polytope did not guarantee flagness nor reduced to the dual associahedron for$k=2$. On our way we provide general results about order polytopes and their triangulations. We call the simplicial complex thenoncrossing complex, and the polytope derived from it the dualGrassmann associahedron. We extend results of Petersenet al.[J. Algebra324(5) (2010), 951–969] showing that the noncrossing complex and the Grassmann associahedron naturally reflect the relations between Grassmannians with different parameters, in particular the isomorphism$G_{k,n}\cong G_{n-k,n}$. Moreover, our approach allows us to show that the adjacency graph of the noncrossing complex admits a natural acyclic orientation that allows us to define aGrassmann–Tamari orderon maximal noncrossing families. Finally, we look at the precise relation of the noncrossing complex and the weak separability complex of Leclerc and Zelevinsky [Amer. Math. Soc. Transl.181(2) (1998), 85–108]; see also Scott [J. Algebra290(1) (2005), 204–220] among others. We show that the weak separability complex is not only a subcomplex of the noncrossing complex as noted by Petersenet al.[J. Algebra324(5) (2010), 951–969] but actually its cyclically invariant part.

2014 ◽  
Vol DMTCS Proceedings vol. AT,... (Proceedings) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Santos ◽  
Christian Stump ◽  
Volkmar Welker

International audience We study a natural generalization of the noncrossing relation between pairs of elements in $[n]$ to $k$-tuples in $[n]$. We show that the flag simplicial complex on $\binom{[n]}{k}$ induced by this relation is a regular, unimodular and flag triangulation of the order polytope of the poset given by the product $[k] \times [n-k]$ of two chains, and it is the join of a simplex and a sphere (that is, it is a Gorenstein triangulation). This shows the existence of a flag simplicial polytope whose Stanley-Reisner ideal is an initial ideal of the Graßmann-Plücker ideal, while previous constructions of such a polytope did not guaranteed flagness. The simplicial complex and the polytope derived from it naturally reflect the relations between Graßmannians with different parameters, in particular the isomorphism $G_{k,n} \cong G_{n-k,n}$. This simplicial complex is closely related to the weak separability complex introduced by Zelevinsky and Leclerc. Nous étudions une généralisation naturelle de la relation entre les paires d’éléments non-croisés de $[n]$ et les $k$-uplets de $[n]$. Nous montrons que le complexe simplicial de drapeau sur $\binom{[n]}{k}$ induit par cette relation est une triangulation régulière, unimodulaire et de drapeau du polytope d’ordre de l’ensemble partiellement ordonné obtenu par le produit $[k] \times [n-k]$ des deux chaînes, et c’est la jointure d’un simplexe et une sphère (c’est-à-dire qu’elle est une triangulation de Gorenstein). Cela montre l’existence d’un polytope simplicial de drapeau dont l’idéal de Stanley-Reisner est un idéal initial de l’idéal de Graßmann-Plücker, tandis que les constructions précédentes d’un tel polytope ne garantissaient pas la propriété de drapeau. Le complexe simplicial et le polytope qui en découle reflètent naturellement les relations entre les Grassmanniens avec différents paramètres, en particulier l’isomorphisme $G_{k,n} \cong G_{n-k,n}$. Ce complexe simplicial est étroitement lié au complexe de séparabilité faible étudié par Zelevinskyet Leclerc.


1984 ◽  
Vol 111 (2) ◽  
pp. 363-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. R. Waters

1.1. Multiple state life tables can be considered a natural generalization of multiple decrement tables in the same way as the latter can be considered a natural generalization of the ordinary mortality table. The essential difference between a multiple state model and a multiple decrement model is that the former allows for transitions in both directions between at least two of the states, see for example Haberman (1983, Fig. 2). whereas in the latter, transitions between any pair of states can be in one direction only, if they are possible at all; see for example Haberman (1983, Fig. 1). Multiple state life tables, unlike mortality tables and multiple decrement tables, are not included in the professional actuarial examination syllabuses in Britain and have only rarely been mentioned in the British actuarial literature, one example being C.M.I.R. (1979, Appendix 2). Despite this, such models have been included in the actuarial examination syllabuses of other countries for several years, for example Denmark, and would appear to have obvious actuarial applications, for example sickness insurance. Dr Haberman's paper (J.I.A. 110) on the subject of multiple state models is to be welcomed since it provides both an introduction to this subject and an interesting application. The approach to the study of multiple state models put forward by Haberman (1983, §3) is characterized by the use of flow, orientation and integration equations. For brevity we shall refer to this as the FOI-approach to multiple state models. The purpose of the present paper is to put forward an alternative approach to multiple state models. This approach uses the forces of transition, or transition intensities, between states as the fundamental quantities of the model. For brevity we shall refer to this as the TI-approach.


2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (01) ◽  
pp. 1650004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Somayeh Moradi ◽  
Fahimeh Khosh-Ahang

For a simplicial complex Δ, we introduce a simplicial complex attached to Δ, called the expansion of Δ, which is a natural generalization of the notion of expansion in graph theory. We are interested in knowing how the properties of a simplicial complex and its Stanley–Reisner ring relate to those of its expansions. It is shown that taking expansion preserves vertex decomposable and shellable properties and in some cases Cohen–Macaulayness. Also it is proved that some homological invariants of Stanley–Reisner ring of a simplicial complex relate to those invariants in the Stanley–Reisner ring of its expansions.


Author(s):  
Robert Connelly ◽  
David W. Henderson

A set X in euclidean space is convex if the line segment joining any two points of X is in X. If X is convex, every boundary point is on an (n − 1)-plane which contains X in one of its two closed half-spaces. Such a plane is called a support plane for X. A simplicial complex K in is called strictly convex if |K| (the underlying space of K) is convex and if, for every simplex σ in ∂K (the boundary of K) there is a support plane for |K| whose intersection with |K| is precisely σ In this case |K| is often called a simplicial polytope.


2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 249-249
Author(s):  
Paulo Palma ◽  
Cassio Riccetto ◽  
Marcelo Thiel ◽  
Miriam Dambros ◽  
Rogerio Fraga ◽  
...  

1986 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 65-85
Author(s):  
Donald E. Weber ◽  
William H. Burke

2001 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauline M. Ryan ◽  
John P. Kelly1Note ◽  
Philip L. Chambers ◽  
Brian E. Leonard

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document