On regular reflection to Mach reflection transition in inviscid flow for shock reflection on a convex or straight wedge

2019 ◽  
Vol 884 ◽  
Author(s):  
He Wang ◽  
Zhigang Zhai

2018 ◽  
Vol 857 ◽  
pp. 784-805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengpeng Wang ◽  
Longsheng Xue ◽  
Keming Cheng

In this paper separation-induced shock reflection is studied theoretically and experimentally. An analytical model is proposed to establish the connections among upstream conditions, downstream conditions and shock configurations. Furthermore, the minimum entropy production principle is employed to determine the incident shock angles as well as the criterion for the transition from regular reflection to Mach reflection, which agrees well with experimental results. Additionally, a solution path for a reflected shock that fulfills the minimum entropy production principle is found in the overall regular reflection domain, based on which the steadiest shock configuration may be determined according to upstream and downstream conditions.


1995 ◽  
Vol 301 ◽  
pp. 19-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Chpoun ◽  
D. Passerel ◽  
H. Li ◽  
G. Ben-Dor

The reflection of shock waves over straight reflecting surfaces in steady flows was investigated experimentally using the supersonic wind tunnel of Laboratoire d'Aerothermique du CNRS, Meudon, France. The results for a flow Mach number M0 = 4.96 contradict the state of the art regarding the regular [harr ] Mach reflection transition in steady flows. Not only was a hysteresis found to exist in this transition, but, unlike previous reports, regular reflection configurations were found to be stable in the dual-solution domain in which theoretically both regular and Mach reflection are possible.


2008 ◽  
Vol 599 ◽  
pp. 81-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. WANG ◽  
S. L. XU ◽  
C. M. GUO

Gaseous detonation propagation in a bifurcated tube was experimentally and numerically studied for stoichiometric hydrogen and oxygen mixtures diluted with argon. Pressure detection, smoked foil recording and schlieren visualization were used in the experiments. Numerical simulation was carried out at low initial pressure (8.00kPa), based on the reactive Navier–Stokes equations in conjunction with a detailed chemical reaction model. The results show that the detonation wave is strongly disturbed by the wall geometry of the bifurcated tube and undergoes a successive process of attenuation, failure, re-initiation and the transition from regular reflection to Mach reflection. Detonation failure is attributed to the rarefaction waves from the left-hand corner by decoupling leading shock and reaction zones. Re-initiation is induced by the inert leading shock reflection on the right-hand wall in the vertical branch. The branched wall geometry has only a local effect on the detonation propagation. In the horizontal branch, the disturbed detonation wave recovers to a self-sustaining one earlier than that in the vertical branch. A critical case was found in the experiments where the disturbed detonation wave can be recovered to be self-sustaining downstream of the horizontal branch, but fails in the vertical branch, as the initial pressure drops to 2.00kPa. Numerical simulation also shows that complex vortex structures can be observed during detonation diffraction. The reflected shock breaks the vortices into pieces and its interaction with the unreacted recirculation region induces an embedded jet. In the vertical branch, owing to the strength difference at any point and the effect of chemical reactions, the Mach stem cannot be approximated as an arc. This is different from the case in non-reactive steady flow. Generally, numerical simulation qualitatively reproduces detonation attenuation, failure, re-initiation and the transition from regular reflection to Mach reflection observed in experiments.


2020 ◽  
Vol 891 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Mavroyiakoumou ◽  
S. Alben


2020 ◽  
Vol 899 ◽  
Author(s):  
Longsheng Xue ◽  
Ferry F. J. Schrijer ◽  
Bas W. van Oudheusden ◽  
Chengpeng Wang ◽  
Zhiwei Shi ◽  
...  

Abstract


2001 ◽  
Vol IV.01.1 (0) ◽  
pp. 335-336
Author(s):  
Takashi ADACHI ◽  
Susumu KOBAYASHI ◽  
Noriyuki CHIBA

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document