Consistent and up-to-date aviation safety targets

2004 ◽  
Vol 108 (1085) ◽  
pp. 345-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Brooker

AbstractThere is a need for consistency between aviation safety targets – target levels of safety (TLS). Consistent ‘risk philosophy’ ensures that resources can be allocated in areas where they will be most beneficial in reducing the number of potential accidents and fatalities. Many existing aviation targets were devised decades ago, have not been brought up to date to take account of the considerable improvement in the sector’s safety performance, and are not targeted at some specific future year. It appears feasible to construct consistent and up-to-date sets of TLSs covering the full range of aviation needs, in particular for air traffic management. However, this requires significant, more demanding, changes to some TLS values. One caveat to note is that the safety of ‘loosely coupled’ aviation systems may be better described and managed by the Health and Safety Executive version of risk assessment rather than by a TLS approach.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Dimitriou ◽  
Stylianos Zantanidis

This paper/chapter deals with the key drivers for adopting and developing an Occupational Health and Safety System (OHS) with a special focus on air traffic management and traffic controller’s workplace. A such system includes regulation and legal compliance procedures, actions and monitoring for ensuring workplace safety, incentives and motivation for the air traffic controller and associate personnel health and wellbeing. By a systemic approach, the key characteristics of OHS towards air traffic management are presented, highlighting the key aspects for implementing a quality management system in air traffic control, which is the cornerstone of airport operation efficiency and productivity on one hand; and the nature of job and the intensive working environment is well recognised. Based on air traffic providers functional analysis the key occupational aspects for air traffic control are taken into consideration, providing the benefits for implementing quality management systems (QMS) and OHS is real business. Conventional wisdom is to highlight the importance for establishing and incorporating a modern custom-made OHS system in accordance with the requirements addressed by OHSAS 18001 to develop and implement a QMS for air traffic services. Contribution of this paper is to highlight the key priorities for managers and decision makers in field of air traffic services providers, depicting ways and recommendation for adopting an efficient path for implementing OHS in a QMS environment.


2015 ◽  
Vol 44-45 ◽  
pp. 65-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulio Di Gravio ◽  
Maurizio Mancini ◽  
Riccardo Patriarca ◽  
Francesco Costantino

Author(s):  
H H de Jong ◽  
F Preti ◽  
G W H van Es

This paper outlines a proposal for a framework of indicators developed with the aim to improve European safety performance monitoring of Air Navigation Services. The extension of scope from the usual choice of Air Traffic Management to Air Navigation Services has been made to address the complication that Air Traffic Management is a different service from Communication, Navigation, and Surveillance, but intimately connected with it. The framework considers the potential influence of Air Navigation Services on air traffic safety, and it uses accidents, their causal/contributing factors, and incidents related to these services as source data for the indicators. Those occurrence categories are considered for which Air Navigation Services have the potential to improve risk. This approach is independent of the notion of a service's contribution to occurrences, which is normally used, but which suffers from a considerable degree of subjectivity. In the data flows from air traffic operations to safety performance indicators, weak links are human incident reporting, varying proportions of incidents actually investigated sufficiently well plus different ways to perform the investigations, and differences in interpretation in providing overviews of the resulting safety data on the level of States. In view of these weaknesses, conditions are developed to prevent data of insufficient quality from being used. The paper mentions a number of aspects to consider when using the indicators. Before drawing conclusions, statistical significance and the existence of reporting bias need to be assessed. The paper finishes with a discussion of the relation of the framework with existing targets and indicates how the framework could support deriving appropriate targets and performance of safety assessments.


2015 ◽  
Vol 72 ◽  
pp. 351-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulio Di Gravio ◽  
Maurizio Mancini ◽  
Riccardo Patriarca ◽  
Francesco Costantino

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document