Greening NAFTA: The North American Commission for Environmental Co-operation

2005 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 501-502
Author(s):  
Judith McKenzie

Greening NAFTA: The North American Commission for Environmental Co-operation, David L. Markell & John H. Knox, eds., Stanford Law & Politics Series; Stanford University Press, 2003, pp. xv, 324.At first blush, the title of this book, Greening NAFTA, would likely be viewed as an oxymoron by most environmentalists. After all, the environmental critiques of free trade including the massive use of fossil fuels in transporting goods around the globe and a “race to the bottom” as it relates to environmental standards, among others, continue to resonate among North American environmentalists. However, once one has tucked into this volume, it becomes clear that the intent of this edited collection is to examine how effective the North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation (the NACEC or CEC) has been in its (now) ten years of existence. Its genesis was largely the result of widespread objections made by North American environmental groups and, at the time it was created (1994), it was the first international organization created to address the environmental aspects and issues associated with economic integration. In some respects, a more appropriate title for this edition would have included a question mark after the word NAFTA, because the contributors to this book have very mixed assessments as to whether the CEC has fulfilled its early promise of having a greening effect on NAFTA.

2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 11-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele M. Betsill

Over the past decade the governance of global climate change has evolved into a complex, multi-level process involving actors and initiatives at multiple levels of social organization from the global to the local in both the public and private spheres. This article analyzes the North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC) as one component of this multilevel governance system. Specifically, it evaluates the CEC as a site of regional climate governance based on three potential advantages of governance through regional organizations: a small number of actors, opportunities for issue linkage, and linkage between national and global governance systems. On each count I find that the benefits of a CEC-based climate governance system are limited and argue for greater consideration of how such a system would interact with other forms of climate governance in North America.


Author(s):  
Salvador Peniche Camps

Ecological Economics studies social metabolism; that is, the material and energy flow into and out of the economy. Using the ecological economics perspective, we analyse the transformation of the economic landscape of the Santiago river basin, Mexico. We discuss why the appropriation of water resources is one of the most important drivers of North American economic integration. We argue that the theoretical model of neo-extractivism can explain the dynamics of social metabolism behind the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).


2012 ◽  
Vol 58 (No. 10) ◽  
pp. 454-466
Author(s):  
E. Cihelková

The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 elaborated the idea of sustainable development. A comprehensive document called the Agenda 21 provided an explanation how to achieve a sustainable economic development. Along the tools presented in the document, there emerged in practice a new regionalism which is based on the preferential trade agreements. Currently, regional agreements are of a more complex nature, so that they may include environmental cooperation, too. The aim of this paper is to illustrate, on the case of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), a possible approach of regional agreements to environmental cooperation. The paper is divided into four sections. The first one summarizes a general approach to addressing environmental issues within the integration groupings. The second tries to answer the question of whether the NAFTA confirms the general approach to the regional environmental governance. The third deals with the meaning and the failure of the regional governance for the assessment of the cross-border impact of the NAFTA/NAAEC on the environment. The fourth and last section gives an answer to whether the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (NAAEC), as the environmental part of the NAFTA, is a good basis for the effective environmental governance in North America.    


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amandine Fillol ◽  
Esther Mc Sween-Cadieux ◽  
Marie-Pier Larose ◽  
Bruno Ventelou ◽  
Ulrich Boris Nguemdjo Kanguem ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Epistemic injustices are increasingly decried in global health. This study aims to investigate whether the source of knowledge influences the perception of that knowledge and the willingness to use it in francophone African health policy-making context. Methods: The study followed a randomized experimental design in which participants were randomly assigned to one of seven policy briefs that were designed with the same scientific content but with different organizations presented as authors. Each organization was representative of financial, scientific, or moral authority. For each type of authority, two organizations were proposed: one North American or European, and the other African. Results: The initial models show that there was no significative association between the type of authority and the location of the authoring organization and the two outcomes (perceived quality and reported instrumental use). Stratified analyses highlighted that policy briefs signed by the North American/European donor organization were perceived to be of lower quality than policy briefs signed by the African donor organization. For both perceived quality and reported instrumental use, these analyses found that policy briefs signed by the North American/European university were associated with higher scores than policy briefs signed by the African university whereas policy briefs signed by the North American/European regional office or international organization were associated with lower score than those signed by the African regional office of the international organization. Conclusion: The results confirm the significant influence of sources on perceived global health knowledge and the intersectionality of sources of influence. This analysis allows us to learn more about organizations in global health leadership, and to reflect on the implications for knowledge translation practices.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document