Habitual Residence: The New Domicile?

2000 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pippa Rogerson
Keyword(s):  
Social Security ◽  
International Law ◽  
European Commission ◽  
Child Custody ◽  
Private International Law ◽  
Habitual Residence ◽  
Choice Of Law ◽  
Rome Convention ◽  
Domestic Legislation

There have been several cases reported over the last few years on the meaning of “habitual residence”. This comparatively new phrase is much in use not only in domestic legislation but also in various Hague Conventions on the reform of private international law and it is in widespread use by the European Commission. Habitual residence is the basis for allocating jurisdiction to that State's court, especially in relation to matrimonial causes and child custody. For example, it has been proposed by the European Commission as a replacement for domicile in the new Convention on the Jurisdiction and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil Matters. Habitual residence is also extremely important in connection with tax matters and social security. It is additionally used in the Immigration Act 1971. Other than its purpose in allocating jurisdiction, habitual residence is beginning to be adopted as a connecting factor for choice of law, for instance the Rome Convention on Choice of Law in Contract.

The Developing EC Private International Law on Family Matters

2001 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 373-412
Author(s):  
Peter Stone
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
European Community ◽  
Child Custody ◽  
Mutual Recognition ◽  
Broad Sense ◽  
Community Level ◽  
Private International Law ◽  
Parental Responsibility ◽  
Choice Of Law ◽  
Recognition And Enforcement

The entry into force on 1st March 2001 of Regulation 1347/2000 on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Matrimonial Matters and in Matters of Parental Responsibility for Children of Both Spouses (‘the Matrimonial Regulation’) amounts to a landmark in the harmonisation of private international law at European Community level. It deals with direct judicial jurisdiction, and the mutual recognition and enforcement of judgments, but not choice of law, in respect of divorce, separation and annulment of marriage, and of custody (in a broad sense) of children of both spouses when determined on the occasion of matrimonial proceedings. It is the first EC measure to enter into force dealing with private international law in family matters, and is likely to be followed up by further such measures, especially in relation to child custody when dealt with independently of any matrimonial proceedings.

SHOULD THE CONNECTING FACTOR OF THE ‘ENGAGING PLACE OF BUSINESS’ BE ABOLISHED IN EUROPEAN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW?

2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 173-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uglješa Grušić
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Private International Law ◽  
Employment Contracts ◽  
Choice Of Law ◽  
Employee Protection ◽  
Rome Convention ◽  
Legal Uncertainty ◽  
The Relationship

AbstractIn Case C–384/10 Jan Voogsgeerd v Navimer SA the ECJ dealt with a number of issues concerning the choice-of-law rules for employment contracts of the Rome Convention, most importantly the relationship between the connecting factors of the habitual place of work and the engaging place of business, and the interpretation of the latter connecting factor. After demonstrating that the ECJ has deprived it of almost any effect, that it leads to excessive legal uncertainty, unforeseeability of the outcome of litigation, and does not support the objectives of employee protection and proximity, this article concludes that the connecting factor of the engaging place of business should be abolished in European private international law.

Part 2 National and Regional Reports, Part 2.4 Europe: Coordinated by Thomas Kadner Graziano, 50 Ukraine: Ukrainian Perspectives on the Hague Principles

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vorobey Dmytro
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Contract Law ◽  
Legal Order ◽  
Private International Law ◽  
Choice Of Law ◽  
Rome Convention ◽  
Recognition And Enforcement ◽  
The Hague ◽  
The Law ◽  
Contractual Obligations

This chapter studies Ukrainian perspectives on the Hague Principles. Ukrainian private international law act, or formally the ‘Law of Ukraine “On Private International Law” ’ (PIL), was adopted on June 23, 2005. As per the Preamble to the PIL, it applies to ‘private [legal] relationships which are connected to one or more legal orders other than the Ukrainian legal order’. According to Article 2 of the PIL, it applies to matters of choice of law, procedural standing of foreign citizens, stateless persons and foreign legal entities, jurisdiction of Ukrainian courts in cases involving foreign parties, execution of letters rogatory, and recognition and enforcement of foreign court judgements in Ukraine. The Ukrainian private international law and specifically the PIL were influenced by the 1980 Rome Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations. Although, considering the relative novelty of the Hague Principles, the authority of the courts to refer to the Hague Principles has not been addressed by the higher Ukrainian courts, the courts have frequently referred to the international codifications of contract law such as the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts.

Part 2 National and Regional Reports, Part 2.2 Asia: Coordinated by Yuko Nishitani and Béligh Elbalti, 20 Bahrain: Bahraini Perspectives on the Hague Principles

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elbalti Béligh ◽  
Shaaban Hosam Osama
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Private International Law ◽  
General Application ◽  
Choice Of Law ◽  
Party Autonomy ◽  
Knowing That ◽  
Domestic Legislation ◽  
Rules And Principles ◽  
General Article ◽  
The Hague

This chapter assesses Bahraini perspectives on the Hague Principles. In Bahrain, private international law rules are mainly found in domestic legislation. The main legislative text in this regard is the Act No 6/2015 on Conflict of Law in Civil and Commercial Matters involving a Foreign Element (the 2015 Act). The Act includes a number of rules of general application, among which is Article 4 on party autonomy in addition to some other rules relating to choice of law in contractual matters in general (Article 17) or applicable to special types of contracts and other juristic acts. It can be safely said that nothing in principle prevents the Bahraini courts from referring to the Hague Principles as a persuasive authority nor from using its solutions in the interpretation or the development of the applicable rules and principles of private international law in Bahrain. This is particularly true knowing that many of the solutions adopted by the 2015 Act are particularly consistent with the Hague Principles’ solutions.

The Developing EC Private International Law on Family Matters

2001 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 373-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Stone
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
European Community ◽  
Child Custody ◽  
Mutual Recognition ◽  
Broad Sense ◽  
Community Level ◽  
Private International Law ◽  
Parental Responsibility ◽  
Choice Of Law ◽  
Recognition And Enforcement

The entry into force on 1st March 2001 of Regulation 1347/2000 on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Matrimonial Matters and in Matters of Parental Responsibility for Children of Both Spouses (‘the Matrimonial Regulation’) amounts to a landmark in the harmonisation of private international law at European Community level. It deals with direct judicial jurisdiction, and the mutual recognition and enforcement of judgments, but not choice of law, in respect of divorce, separation and annulment of marriage, and of custody (in a broad sense) of children of both spouses when determined on the occasion of matrimonial proceedings. It is the first EC measure to enter into force dealing with private international law in family matters, and is likely to be followed up by further such measures, especially in relation to child custody when dealt with independently of any matrimonial proceedings.

scholarly journals A NEW SOLUTION CONCERNING CHOICE-OF-LAW FOR THE ASSIGNMENT OF DEBTS

2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 665-696
Author(s):  
Alison Xu
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Analytical Framework ◽  
Use Value ◽  
Private International Law ◽  
Choice Of Law ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Exchange Value

AbstractThis article explores a solution to the choice-of-law issues concerning both voluntary and involuntary assignments arising in a domestic forum. The focus is on English private international law rules relating to cross-border assignments. A distinction is made between primary and extended parties as the foundation for choice-of-law analysis. Drawing on insights from the distinction of the use value and exchange value of debts found in economics, this article proposes a new analytical framework for choice-of-law based on a modified choice-of-law theory of interest-analysis.

Protection of the right to social security of the migrant worker in international law

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-148
Author(s):  
Kehinde Anifalaje
Keyword(s):  
Social Security ◽  
International Law ◽  
Migrant Workers ◽  
Migrant Worker ◽  
Human Right ◽  
Number Of Factors ◽  
The Social ◽  
Domestic Legislation ◽  
The Right ◽  
International Instruments

The right to social security is recognised as a basic human right in a number of international instruments. While most nations give recognition to social security rights and generally enforce them within the dictates of domestic legislation to their nationals, the narrative is different for non-nationals, particularly the migrant worker. The article examines the measures that have been deployed at international and regional levels to protect the social security rights of migrant workers, with particular attention to the regular ones. It argues that a number of factors, including the doctrines of territoriality and nationality, account for the marginalisation of the migrant worker in the enforcement of these rights. Some migrant-specific international instruments and series of bilateral and multilateral agreements to overcome these perceived challenges are being hindered by the low number of ratifying countries and disparities in the design and level of development of schemes for specific branches of social security across countries. The article concludes that the social security right of the migrant worker would be enhanced if more countries ratify, domesticate and enforce relevant international instruments on the social security rights of the migrant worker and complement same by a much more coordinated bilateral and multilateral social security agreements.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document