CPG-chromatography studies on the stability of casein micelles

1979 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 313-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Märtha Larsson-Raźnikiewicz ◽  
Elisabeth Almlöf ◽  
Bo Ekstrand
Keyword(s):  
Freeze Drying ◽  
Whey Proteins ◽  
Skim Milk ◽  
Casein Micelles ◽  
Controlled Pore Glass ◽  
Milk Serum ◽  
Colloidal Calcium Phosphate ◽  
Pore Glass ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Β Lactoglobulin

SUMMARYCasein micelles fractionated on controlled pore glass (CPG-10/3000) were shown to be stable by recycling experiments. Only minor effects on the size distribution of the casein micelles were found after heating skim-milk to 100 °C for 10 min, or freeze-drying skim-milk at – 70 °C followed by resuspension in the synthetic milk serum of Jenness & Koops (1962). The heating caused some whey proteins (β-lactoglobulin) to enter the micelle fractions while the freeze-drying caused some of the largest micelles to disrupt. In colloidal calcium phosphate-free skim-milk prepared according to Pyne & McGann (1960) all the micelles appeared to dissociate into monomeric caseins.

High-pressure treatment of milk: effects on casein micelle structure and on enzymic coagulation

2000 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
ERIC C. NEEDS ◽  
ROBERT A. STENNING ◽  
ALISON L. GILL ◽  
VICTORIA FERRAGUT ◽  
GILLIAN T. RICH
Keyword(s):  
Whey Proteins ◽  
Skim Milk ◽  
Casein Micelle ◽  
Casein Micelles ◽  
Dense Networks ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Micelle Structure ◽  
Milk Casein ◽  
Β Lactoglobulin ◽  
Gel Network

High isostatic pressures up to 600 MPa were applied to samples of skim milk before addition of rennet and preparation of cheese curds. Electron microscopy revealed the structure of rennet gels produced from pressure-treated milks. These contained dense networks of fine strands, which were continuous over much bigger distances than in gels produced from untreated milk, where the strands were coarser with large interstitial spaces. Alterations in gel network structure gave rise to differences in rheology with much higher values for the storage moduli in the pressure-treated milk gels. The rate of gel formation and the water retention within the gel matrix were also affected by the processing of the milk. Casein micelles were disrupted by pressure and disruption appeared to be complete at treatments of 400 MPa and above. Whey proteins, particularly β-lactoglobulin, were progressively denatured as increasing pressure was applied, and the denatured β-lactoglobulin was incorporated into the rennet gels. Pressure-treated micelles were coagulated rapidly by rennet, but the presence of denatured β-lactoglobulin interfered with the secondary aggregation phase and reduced the overall rate of coagulation. Syneresis from the curds was significantly reduced following treatment of the milk at 600 MPa, probably owing to the effects of a finer gel network and increased inclusion of whey protein. Levels of syneresis were more similar to control samples when the milk was treated at 400 MPa or less.

Factors affecting the ethanol stability of bovine milk.: I. Effect of serum phase components

1981 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Horne ◽  
Thomas G. Parker
Keyword(s):  
Whey Proteins ◽  
Bovine Milk ◽  
Skim Milk ◽  
Casein Micelles ◽  
Ph Profile ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Milk Serum ◽  
Ethanol Stability ◽  
Serum Components

SummaryBy resuspending casein micelles in whey and dialysate it is shown that the role of whey proteins in the ethanol (EtOH)-induced coagulation of skim-milk is minimal. Experiments involving the interchange of milk sera indicated that the position of the EtOH stability/pH profile along the pH axis was governed by the diffusible constituents of the milk serum phase. The identities of those serum components governing the shape and position of the EtOH stability/pH profile were investigated. The addition of Ca2+ caused a shift in the entire profile to higher pH. Reduction of the available Ca2+ by addition of EDTA (up to 5 ran) shifted the profile to lower pH. The addition of phosphate (up to 5 mM) or citrate (up to 1 mM) had no effect on the profile, though higher concentrations of citrate (up to 5 mMi) caused slight shifts to lower pH. When equimolar amounts of Ca and phosphate were added, the system showed a shift in profile approximately equivalent to that of the free Ca introduced. Increasing the ionic strength of a milk by the addition of NaCl did not shift the profile, but decreased the maximum EtOH stability of the high pH arm of the sigmoidal profile. The EtOH stability/pH profile retained the same sigmoidal shape in all cases.

Stability of lipoprotein lipase activity in bovine milk

1982 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malcolm Anderson
Keyword(s):  
Lipoprotein Lipase ◽  
Lipase Activity ◽  
Bovine Milk ◽  
Skim Milk ◽  
Deionized Water ◽  
Lipoprotein Lipase Activity ◽  
Casein Micelles ◽  
Milk Serum ◽  
Effects Of Temperature ◽  
The Stability

SUMMARYThe effects of temperature, dilution, dialysis and the presence of heparin on the stability of lipoprotein lipase (LPL) in milk, skim-milk, milk serum and casein micelles were investigated. At 4 and 20 °C milk serum was the source of the least stable LPL and casein was that of the most stable. There was little difference between LPL stability in milk and skim-milk at these temperatures, or between serum and casein LPL at 50 °C. Heparin (5 µg/ml) increased stability although the effect was less for casein LPL than for serum LPL. A 40-fold dilution of serum LPL with either simulated milk ultrafiltrate (SMUF) or 0·01 M-Tris-Cl pH 8·3 increased the loss of serum LPL, but not of casein LPL. Dialysis of skim-milk against deionized water or SMUF increased stability at 4 or 20 °C but not at 37 °C. LPL activity was more stable in diluted samples of dialysed skim-milk than in diluted samples of the same milk which had not been dialysed. Dialysis against deionized water increased lipolysis but against SMUF it did not increase. Solutions prepared by dialysing water against some milks were found to inhibit lipolysis and this effect was overcome by heparin. The possibility that milk serum contains a factor which influences LPL stability is discussed.

Fixation of bovine casein micelles for chromatography on controlled pore glass

1984 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 615-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malcolm Anderson ◽  
Mary C. A. Griffin ◽  
Carolyn Moore
Keyword(s):  
Skim Milk ◽  
Correlation Spectroscopy ◽  
Casein Micelle ◽  
Elution Profile ◽  
Casein Micelles ◽  
Controlled Pore Glass ◽  
Micelle Size ◽  
Pore Glass ◽  
Peak Areas ◽  
Profile Area

SummaryGlutaraldehyde was used to fix the size distribution of casein micelles in skim milk before their fractionation by permeation chromatography on controlled pore glass. The effect of fixation was assessed by comparing the size and absorption profile for column fractions obtained from samples which were fixed before fractionation with those of unfixed samples and of samples that were fixed only after completion of chromatography. Micelle size was determined by photon correlation spectroscopy. Column profiles were obtained from absorption measurements at 340 nm and after pronase digestion at 280 nm to determine relative protein concentration. For comparative purposes the elution profile was divided into 4 peak areas, of which I-III contained most of the casein micelles, and IV consisted of the smallest micelles, soluble casein and whey protein. Average micelle size was unaltered by fixation but was larger in fractions from prefixed skim milk than those from unfixed samples. Fixation increased the absorbance readings but the elution profile at 340 nm for peak areas I-III was essentially the same for unfixed fractions and those obtained when fixation was applied after chromatography. However, areas I-III accounted for a much larger proportion of the total profile area when the latter procedure was followed. Total profile area increased with fixation time and temperature but this did not affect the elution profile. The results indicate that fixation with glutaraldehyde does not induce artefactual changes in casein micelle size.

Ethanol stability of casein micelles – a hypothesis concerning the role of calcium phosphate

1987 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 389-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Horne
Keyword(s):  
Ionic Strength ◽  
Skim Milk ◽  
Buffer System ◽  
Casein Micelles ◽  
Buffer Solutions ◽  
Relative Response ◽  
Using Data ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Ethanol Stability

SummaryThe ethanol (EtOH) stability of skim milk and the stability towards aggregation of casein micelles diluted into ethanolic buffer solutions were compared using data obtained from previously published experiments. Differences in absolute stability and in relative response were observed when Ca2+ level and pH were adjusted, the buffer system results lying below those from skim milk in both cases. Increasing the ionic strength of skim milk adjusted to pH 7·0 lowered its EtOH stability whereas increasing the ionic strength of the diluting buffer increased the stability of the casein micelles. The hypothesis is put forward that the differences are due to the simultaneous precipitation of Ca phosphate when EtOH is added to skim milk. This draws calcium from the caseinate sites of the micelle, counteracting the destabilizing effects of the EtOH towards the micelle. Such removal and the consequent restructuring are kinetically controlled and micellar precipitation in skim milk finally occurs when the micellar coagulation time falls within the time scale of the restructuring reactions.

Stability of buffalo casein micelles

1979 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 401-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nripendra C. Ganguli
Keyword(s):  
Sialic Acid ◽  
Gel Filtration ◽  
Skim Milk ◽  
Heat Stability ◽  
Casein Micelles ◽  
Heat Stable ◽  
Micellar Casein ◽  
Acid Release ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Better Than

SUMMARYBuffalo skim-milk is less heat stable than cow skim-milk. Interchanging ultracentrifugal whey (UCW) and milk diffusate with micellar casein caused significant changes in the heat stability of buffalo casein micelles (BCM) and cow casein micelles (CCM). Buffalo UCW dramatically destabilized COM, whereas buffalo diffu-sate with CCM exhibited the highest heat stability.Cow κ-casein stabilizes αs-casein against precipitation by Ca better than buffalo º-casein. About 90% of αs-casein could be stabilized by κ: αs ratios of 0·20 and 0·231 for cow and buffalo, respectively.Sialic acid release from micellar κ-casein by rennet was higher than from acid κ-casein in both buffalo and cow caseins, the release being slower in buffalo. The released macropeptide from buffalo κ-casein was smaller than that from cow κ-casein as revealed by Sephadex gel filtration.Sub-units of BCM have less sialic acid (1·57mg/g) than whole micelles (2·70mg/g). On rennet action, 47% of bound sialic acid was released from sub-units as against 85% from whole micelles. The sub-micelles are less heat stable than whole micelles. Among ions tested, added Ca reduced heat stability more dramatically in whole micelles, whereas added phosphate improved the stability of micelles and, more strikingly, of sub-micelles. Citrate also improved the heat stability of sub-micelles but not of whole micelles.

Changes in milk on heating: viscosity measurements

1993 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theo J. M. Jeurnink ◽  
Kees G. De Kruif
Keyword(s):  
Heat Treatment ◽  
Heat Exchangers ◽  
Hard Spheres ◽  
Whey Proteins ◽  
Skim Milk ◽  
Quantitative Model ◽  
Casein Micelles ◽  
Mutual Attraction ◽  
Viscosity Measurements ◽  
Quantitative Basis

SummarySkim milk was heated at 85 °C for different holding times. As a result of such heating, whey proteins, in particular β-lactoglobulin, denatured and associated with casein micelles. This led to an increase in size of the casein micelles but also to a different interaction between them. Both these changes could be described by using a quantitative model which was developed for the viscosity of so-called adhesive hard spheres. We applied the model successfully to skim milk and were able to describe on a quantitative basis the changes due to the heat treatment of milk. It was shown that after heating the casein micelles became larger and acquired a mutual attraction. The unfolding of the whey proteins and their subsequent association with the casein micelles appeared to be responsible for these changes. How this reaction influences the fouling of heat exchangers is discussed.

Heat stability of milk: pH-dependent dissociation of micellar κ-casein on heating milk at ultra high temperatures

1985 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 529-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harjinder Singh ◽  
Partick F. Fox
Keyword(s):  
Whey Protein ◽  
Whey Proteins ◽  
Heat Stability ◽  
Casein Micelle ◽  
Casein Micelles ◽  
Ph Profile ◽  
Ph Values ◽  
Maximum Stability ◽  
Β Lactoglobulin ◽  
Maximum Minimum

SUMMARYPreheating milk at 140 °C for 1 min at pH 6·6, 6·8, 7·0 or 7·2 shifted the heat coagulation time (HCT)/pH profile to acidic values without significantly affecting the maximum stability. Whey proteins (both β-lactoglobulin and α-lactalbumin) co-sedimented with the casein micelles after heating milk at pH < 6·9 and the whey protein-coated micelles, dispersed in milk ultrafiltrate, showed characteristic maxima–minima in their HCT/pH profile. Heating milk at higher pH values (> 6·9) resulted in the dissociation of whey proteins and κ-casein-rich protein from the micelles and the residual micelles were unstable, without a maximum–minimum in the HCT/pH profile. Preformed whey protein–casein micelle complexes formed by preheating (140 °C for 1 min) milk at pH 6·7 dissociated from the micelles on reheating (140 °C for 1 min) at pH > 6·9. The dissociation of micellar-κ-casein, perhaps complexed with whey proteins, may reduce the micellar zeta potential at pH ≃ 6·9 sufficiently to cause a minimum in the HCT/pH profile of milk.

Comparison of heat and pressure treatments of skim milk, fortified with whey protein concentrate, for set yogurt preparation: effects on milk proteins and gel structure

2000 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 329-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
ERIC C. NEEDS ◽  
MARTA CAPELLAS ◽  
A. PATRICIA BLAND ◽  
PRETIMA MANOJ ◽  
DOUGLAS MACDOUGAL ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heat Treatment ◽  
Whey Protein ◽  
Skim Milk ◽  
Milk Proteins ◽  
Whey Protein Concentrate ◽  
Protein Concentrate ◽  
Casein Micelles ◽  
Micelle Structure ◽  
Dynamic Structures ◽  
Β Lactoglobulin

Heat (85 °C for 20 min) and pressure (600 MPa for 15 min) treatments were applied to skim milk fortified by addition of whey protein concentrate. Both treatments caused > 90% denaturation of β-lactoglobulin. During heat treatment this denaturation took place in the presence of intact casein micelles; during pressure treatment it occurred while the micelles were in a highly dissociated state. As a result micelle structure and the distribution of β-lactoglobulin were different in the two milks. Electron microscopy and immunolabelling techniques were used to examine the milks after processing and during their transition to yogurt gels. The disruption of micelles by high pressure caused a significant change in the appearance of the milk which was quantified by measurement of the colour values L*, a* and b*. Heat treatment also affected these characteristics. Casein micelles are dynamic structures, influenced by changes to their environment. This was clearly demonstrated by the transition from the clusters of small irregularly shaped micelle fragments present in cold pressure-treated milk to round, separate and compact micelles formed on warming the milk to 43 °C. The effect of this transition was observed as significant changes in the colour indicators. During yogurt gel formation, further changes in micelle structure, occurring in both pressure and heat-treated samples, resulted in a convergence of colour values. However, the microstructure of the gels and their rheological properties were very different. Pressure-treated milk yogurt had a much higher storage modulus but yielded more readily to large deformation than the heated milk yogurt. These changes in micelle structure during processing and yogurt preparation are discussed in terms of a recently published micelle model.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document