Comparative study of efficacy and toxicities of cisplatin vs vinorelbine as radiosensitisers in locally advanced head and neck cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 122 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
S K Sarkar ◽  
N B Patra ◽  
J Goswami ◽  
S Basu

AbstractIntroduction:Currently, concomitant chemoradiation using cisplatin is one of the standards of care for the management of head and neck cancer, but at the cost of increased acute toxicity. Our aim was to assess whether vinorelbine was less toxic and of at least comparable efficacy, if not better, compared with cisplatin.Materials and methods:A total of 72 patients with squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck region were recruited, 40 in arm A and 32 in arm B. Patients in arm A received 40 mg/m2 cisplatin weekly. Patients in arm B received 6 mg/m2 vinorelbine weekly. Both arms also received 66 Gy of radiation in conventional fractionation.Results and analysis:There was no statistically significant difference in response rate or toxicities between the two arms, except for nausea and/or vomiting, which was significantly less frequent in the vinorelbine arm.Conclusion:Vinorelbine was as effective as cisplatin in controlling locoregional disease in locally advanced head and neck cancer, but was only marginally less toxic than cisplatin.

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-138
Author(s):  
Ehab Saad ◽  
Riham Hani Radwan ◽  
Eman Abdel Hadi

AbstractObjective:In the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer (LA-HNC), both dose escalation and hypo-fractionation can improve tumour control rates with uncertain role of addition of concurrent chemotherapy. We aimed at developing a new radiotherapy protocol for patients not eligible to receive the standard concurrent chemo-radiation therapy (CCRT) with little toxicity profile.Methods:A total of 63 LA-HNC patients were randomised to receive either: 70 Gy in 35 fx in 7 weeks concurrently with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for 3 doses (Arm A) or 74 Gy in 33 fx in 6·5 weeks (Arm B). Volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were created for both treatment arms. We compared the local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and acute and late toxicity between the two arms.Results:A total of 33 patients were in Arm A versus 30 patients in Arm B with median follow-up 24·2 months. No significant differences in LC, PFS and OS between the two arms. Complete remission occurred in 54·5 and 63·3% of patients in Arms A and B, respectively. All toxicities were significantly less in Arm B than Arm A.Conclusion:Slightly dose-escalated hypo-fractionated regimen is safe and feasible and has comparable efficacy and less acute and late side effects than conventional dose CCRT with avoidance of chemotherapy-related toxicities in LA-HNC patients.


2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Arias ◽  
V. Chicata ◽  
M. J. García-Velloso ◽  
G. Asín ◽  
M. Uzcanga ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document