Hand-grip strength does not correlate with treatment-related weight loss in patients with head and neck cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 129 (7) ◽  
pp. 706-709 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Cosway ◽  
M Easby ◽  
S Covington ◽  
I Bowe ◽  
V Paleri
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Grip Strength ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Hand Grip Strength ◽  
Prospective Audit ◽  
Hand Grip ◽  
Routine Assessment

AbstractBackground:Hand-grip strength has been shown to be a reliable predictor of health outcomes. However, evidence supporting its use as an indicator of nutritional status is inconsistent. This study investigated its use in monitoring nutritional status in patients with head and neck cancer.Methods:A prospective audit of patients treated for head and neck cancer was undertaken at four centres over a three-month period in 2009. Nutritional outcomes were collected at 3, 6 and 12 months, and the data were statistically analysed.Results:Data from 114 patients showed that mean weight, but not hand-grip strength, fell significantly at 3, 6 and 12 months post-treatment (p < 0.003 vs p < 0.126).Conclusion:A fall in weight does not coincide with a drop in hand-grip strength in patients receiving treatment for head and neck cancer. Hand-grip strength may therefore not be of benefit in the nutritional assessment of these patients and should not be part of routine assessment.

Nutritional status as a prognostic factor in advanced head and neck cancer

1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 376-376
Author(s):  
Quak ◽  
Van Bokhorst ◽  
Klop ◽  
Van Leeuwen ◽  
Snow
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Advanced Head

Prognosis in Head and Neck Cancer: Importance of Nutritional and Biological Inflammatory Status

2021 ◽  
pp. 019459982110045
Author(s):  
Nicolas Saroul ◽  
Mathilde Puechmaille ◽  
Céline Lambert ◽  
Achraf Sayed Hassan ◽  
Julian Biau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Inflammatory Response ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Inflammatory Status ◽  
Nutritional Risk Index

Objectives To determine the importance of nutritional status, social status, and inflammatory status in the prognosis of head and neck cancer. Study Design Single-center retrospective study of prospectively collected data. Setting Tertiary referral center. Methods Ninety-two consecutive patients newly diagnosed for cancer of the upper aerodigestive tract without metastases were assessed at time of diagnosis for several prognostic factors. Nutritional status was assessed by the nutritional risk index, social status by the EPICES score, and inflammatory status by the systemic inflammatory response index. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Results In multivariable analysis, the main prognostic factors were the TNM classification (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.34, P = .002, for stage T3-4), malnutrition as assessed by the nutritional risk index (HR = 3.64, P = .008, for severe malnutrition), and a systemic inflammatory response index score ≥1.6 (HR = 3.32, P = .02). Social deprivation was not a prognostic factor. Conclusion Prognosis in head and neck cancer is multifactorial; however, malnutrition and inflammation are important factors that are potentially reversible by early intervention.

Hand grip strength: Outcome predictor and marker of nutritional status

2011 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Norman ◽  
Nicole Stobäus ◽  
M. Cristina Gonzalez ◽  
Jörg-Dieter Schulzke ◽  
Matthias Pirlich
Keyword(s):  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Grip Strength ◽  
Hand Grip Strength ◽  
Outcome Predictor ◽  
Hand Grip

scholarly journals Nutritional status and dietary quality index of head and neck cancer patients undergoing chemo radiotherapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-14
Author(s):  
Shirin Fattahi ◽  
Farshad Seyyednejad ◽  
Sarvin Sanaie ◽  
Tahereh Parhizkar ◽  
Elnaz Faramarzi
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Quality Index ◽  
Dietary Diversity ◽  
Mini Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Dietary Quality ◽  
Quality Indices

Introduction: Considering the important role of early detection of malnutrition in patients with cancer and its negative effects on the outcome, as well as the lack of any published article (to the best of our knowledge) about the dietary quality index in head and neck cancer patients treated with chemoradio therapy, we decided to evaluate the nutritional status and dietary quality index in these patients. Methods: In this study, thirty-seven volunteer patients with head and neck cancer were recruited. Nutritional status of the patients was evaluated by Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) questionnaire. Dietary diversity score, dietary variety score, and diet quality index–international were calculated to assess the dietary quality of the patients. Results: Our findings indicated that about half of the patients were well nourished and 48.6%were at the risk of malnutrition. We did not find any significant differences between variousdietary quality indices and nutritional status of the patients. However, a significant reverse correlation was observed between dietary quality indices and nutritional status of the patients. Conclusion: According to our findings, the evaluation of nutritional status and the prediction of the patients at higher risks of chemoradio therapy-induced adverse events, may have a major role in the prevention of treatment gaps.

Elective gastrostomy, nutritional status and quality of life in advanced head and neck cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy

2009 ◽  
Vol 79 (10) ◽  
pp. 713-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randall P. Morton ◽  
Victoria L. Crowder ◽  
Robert Mawdsley ◽  
Esther Ong ◽  
Mark Izzard
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Advanced Head

scholarly journals Alleviation of dry mouth by saliva substitutes improved swallowing ability and clinical nutritional status of post-radiotherapy head and neck cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 2817-2828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumalee Nuchit ◽  
Aroonwan Lam-ubol ◽  
Wannaporn Paemuang ◽  
Sineepat Talungchit ◽  
Orapin Chokchaitam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Dry Mouth ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Saliva Substitutes

Abstract Purpose The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of an edible saliva substitute, oral moisturizing jelly (OMJ), and a topical saliva gel (GC) on dry mouth, swallowing ability, and nutritional status in post-radiotherapy head and neck cancer patients. Methods Sixty-two post-radiation head and neck cancer patients with xerostomia completed a blinded randomized controlled trial. They were advised to swallow OMJ (n = 31) or apply GC orally (n = 31) for 2 months. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline, 1, and 2 months, including subjective and objective dry mouth (Challcombe) scores, subjective swallowing problem scores (EAT-10), water swallowing time, clinical nutritional status (PG-SGA), body weight, and dietary intake. Results After 1 and 2 months of interventions, subjective and objective dry mouth scores, subjective swallowing problem scores, swallowing times, and clinical nutritional status in both groups were significantly improved (p < 0.0001). Compared to GC, OMJ group had higher percent improvement in all outcome measures (p < 0.001) except swallowing time and clinical nutritional status. Interestingly, subjective dry mouth scores were significantly correlated with subjective swallowing problem scores (r = 0.5321, p < 0.0001). Conclusions Continuous uses of saliva substitutes (OMJ or GC) for at least a month improved signs and symptoms of dry mouth and enhanced swallowing ability. An edible saliva substitute was superior to a topical saliva gel for alleviating dry mouth and swallow problems. These lead to improved clinical nutritional status. Thus, palliation of dry mouth may be critical to support nutrition of post-radiotherapy head and neck cancer patients. Clinical trial registry Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03035825

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document