scholarly journals Imaging in head and neck cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines

2016 ◽  
Vol 130 (S2) ◽  
pp. S28-S31 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Lewis-Jones ◽  
S Colley ◽  
D Gibson

AbstractThis guideline is endorsed by the specialty associations involved in the care of head and neck cancer patients in the UK. This paper summarises the current imaging modalities in use for head and neck cancer evaluation. It highlights their role in the management with recommendations on modality choice for each cancer subsite.Recommendations• Offer appropriate radiological imaging, based on tumour extent, site and local expertise, to stage tumours and plan treatment for patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer. (G)• Consider positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET–CT) imaging if conventional cross-sectional imaging identifies no primary site. (R)• Offer PET–CT imaging 12 weeks after non-surgical treatment to detect residual disease. (R)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15) ◽  
pp. 2509-2515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin J. Moeller ◽  
Vishal Rana ◽  
Blake A. Cannon ◽  
Michelle D. Williams ◽  
Erich M. Sturgis ◽  
...  

Purpose [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging may improve assessment of radiation response in patients with head and neck cancer, but it is not yet known for which patients this is most useful. We conducted a prospective trial to identify patient populations likely to benefit from the addition of functional imaging to the assessment of radiotherapy response. Patients and Methods Ninety-eight patients with locally advanced cancer of the oropharynx, larynx, or hypopharynx were prospectively enrolled and treated with primary radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy. Patients underwent FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT imaging 8 weeks after completion of treatment. Functional and anatomic imaging response was correlated with clinical and pathologic response. Imaging accuracy was then compared between imaging modalities. Results Although postradiation maximum standard uptake values were significantly higher in nonresponders compared with responders, the positive and negative predictive values of FDG-PET/CT scanning were similar to those for CT alone in the unselected study population. Subset analyses revealed that FDG-PET/CT outperformed CT alone in response assessment for patients at high risk for treatment failure (those with human papillomavirus [HPV] –negative disease, nonoropharyngeal primaries, or history of tobacco use). No benefit to FDG-PET/CT was seen for low-risk patients lacking these features. Conclusion These data do not support the broad application of FDG-PET/CT for radiation response assessment in unselected head and neck cancer patients. However, FDG-PET/CT may be the imaging modality of choice for patients with highest risk disease, particularly those with HPV-negative tumors. Optimal timing of FDG-PET/CT imaging after radiotherapy merits further investigation.


2005 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee A. Zimmer ◽  
Carl Snyderman ◽  
Melanie B. Fukui ◽  
Todd Blodgett ◽  
Barry McCook ◽  
...  

We performed a retrospective study of 47 patients to ascertain the ability of combined positron-emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) to localize recurrent head and neck cancer. When clinically warranted, biopsies were performed in an attempt to obtain pathologic confirmation of the PET/CT findings. Of the 47 patients, 33 exhibited PET/CT findings consistent with recurrent cancer. Of the 33 patients, 25 underwent either biopsy or surgical excision of disease in an attempt to obtain a pathologic confirmation. Biopsy analysis confirmed the PET/CT findings in 22 of these patients; in the remaining 3 patients, pathologic findings were inconsistent with the PET/CT diagnosis. Based on the subset of 25 patients who underwent pathologic testing, the sensitivity of combined PET/CT was 95% and the specificity was 60%. We conclude that combined PET/CT imaging is a valuable tool for localizing tumor recurrence in patients with head and neck cancer.


2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Evangelista ◽  
Anna Rita Cervino ◽  
Sotirios Chondrogiannis ◽  
Maria Cristina Marzola ◽  
Anna Margherita Maffione ◽  
...  

Head & Neck ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Oliver ◽  
Ashok Muthukrishnan ◽  
James Mountz ◽  
Erin Deeb ◽  
Jonas Johnson ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 157-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie B Fukui ◽  
Todd M Blodgett ◽  
Carolyn Cidis Meltzer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document