Hot Saline Irrigation for Haemostasis in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

AbstractBackgroundNasal irrigation is commonly performed in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis after functional endoscopic sinus surgery. This study systematically assessed the clinical efficacy of nasal irrigation from the medical literature.MethodsThe PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched using a comprehensive strategy, limited to English-language articles, published from October 1971 to March 2017, and comprising human subjects.ResultsA total of 824 trials were identified, 5 of which, involving 331 participants, were included in this systematic review. After selection, only three trials were eligible for inclusion in a meta-analysis. Nasal irrigation using normal saline and various solutions was found to be effective in reducing symptom scores and endoscopic scores for chronic rhinosinusitis patients after functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Comparison of outcome measures, such as eosinophil count reduction, revealed that various solutions are more effective than normal saline alone; however, no statistical significance was found in terms of reduced symptom or endoscopic scores.ConclusionBased on the current limited evidence, nasal irrigation is an effective therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis patients after functional endoscopic sinus surgery. However, when comparing various solutions with normal saline, no significant difference was found in symptom scores or endoscopic scores.

Download Full-text

Absorbable and nonabsorbable packing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology ◽

10.1007/s00405-014-3107-2 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 272 (8) ◽

pp. 1825-1831 ◽

Cited By ~ 14

Author(s):

Tang-Chuan Wang ◽

Chih-Jaan Tai ◽

Yung-An Tsou ◽

Li-Tai Tsai ◽

Yu-Fen Li ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽

Sinus Surgery

Download Full-text

Role of corticosteroids in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Rhinology Journal ◽

10.4193/rhin15.079 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 54 (1) ◽

pp. 3-19 ◽

Cited By ~ 32

Author(s):

V. Pundir ◽

J. Pundir ◽

G. Lancaster ◽

P. Kirkland ◽

M. Cornet ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽

Sinus Surgery

Download Full-text

Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Improves Sleep Quality in Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Otolaryngology ◽

10.1177/0194599817737977 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 158 (2) ◽

pp. 249-256 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Daniel C. Sukato ◽

Jason M. Abramowitz ◽

Marina Boruk ◽

Nira A. Goldstein ◽

Richard M. Rosenfeld

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Sleep Quality ◽

Chronic Rhinosinusitis ◽

Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Research Direction ◽

Sinus Surgery ◽

Future Research ◽

Apnea Hypopnea Index ◽

Poor Sleep

Objective Up to 75% of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) suffer with poor sleep quality and reduced quality of life. Endoscopic sinus surgery has demonstrated encouraging results in improving sleep function. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the change in sleep quality after surgery for CRS. Data Sources PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE. Review Methods An electronic search was conducted with the keywords “sinusitis” or “rhinosinusitis” and “sleep.” Studies were included only when adults underwent endoscopic sinus surgery and were evaluated pre- and postoperatively by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI), the sleep domain of Sino-Nasal Outcome Test–22, or the sleep domain of Rhinosinusitis Disability Index. Results The database search yielded 1939 studies, of which 7 remained after dual-investigator screening. The standardized mean differences (95% CI) for the ESS, PSQI, and AHI were −0.94 (−1.63 to −0.26), −0.80 (−1.46 to −0.14), and −0.20 (−0.32 to −0.07), indicating large, moderate to large, and small improvements, respectively. All analyses displayed high heterogeneity ( I2 = 95%-99%). Conclusion Sleep quality, as measured by the ESS and PSQI surveys, shows substantial improvement after surgery for CRS, with smaller improvement seen for AHI. Generalizability of our results is limited by high heterogeneity among studies and by broad confidence intervals that cannot exclude small to trivial changes. The findings of this meta-analysis provide insight into the effect of CRS-related endoscopic sinus surgery on sleep quality, which should guide future research direction and counseling of patients in the clinical setting.

Download Full-text

Outcomes of Concurrent Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery and Rhinoplasty: A Meta-analysis

American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy ◽

10.1177/1945892420980673 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 194589242098067

Author(s):

Benjamin F. Bitner ◽

Karthik R. Prasad ◽

Khodayar Goshtasbi ◽

Brandyn S. Dunn ◽

Edward C. Kuan

Keyword(s):

Patient Satisfaction ◽

Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽

Sinus Surgery ◽

Complication Rates ◽

Medical Problems ◽

Random Effects Models ◽

Ovid Medline ◽

Significant Difference

Introduction Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and functional nasal airway obstruction are common but distinct medical problems which affect quality of life. In certain instances, patients often benefit from concomitant functional septorhinoplasty, or elect for cosmetic rhinoplasty, in addition to functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) and prefer combining procedures. Determining outcomes of combined surgery is important when discussing risks and benefits with patients. Methods A thorough literature search of articles published in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases. Patients were categorized as either having FESS or rhinoplasty alone or combined. Binary random-effects models were applied to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for outcomes including complications, recurrence, and satisfaction. Results Of the 55 screened articles, 6 were included in the analysis, and of these, 6 (405 patients), 2 (90 patients), 4 (290 patients), and 3 (190 patients) provided data for postoperative complications, recurrence of CRS symptoms, revision rates, and patient satisfaction, respectively. Major complications were observed in 11 (5.8%) total combined cases, 0 (0%) FESS cases, and 6 (3.5%) rhinoplasty cases with no statistical difference between combined cases and rhinoplasties (OR 1.37, 95% CI 0.45–4.16, p = 0.58). Recurrence of CRS symptoms was noted in 35.6% combined cases and 28.9% FESS cases (OR 1.42, 95% CI 0.55–3.64, p = 0.47). There was no observed difference in revision rates between combined and isolated rhinoplasties (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.43–2.32, p = 1). Lastly, 91.6% of patients were satisfied with results of combined cases compared to 87.4% of patients in standalone cases (OR 1.57, 95% CI 0.61–4.03, p = 0.35). Conclusion Aggregate evidence demonstrates similar risk in complication rates in combined surgical cases compared to stand-alone rhinoplasty. There appears to be no significant difference in recurrence of symptoms, revision rates or patient satisfaction.

Download Full-text

Hyaluronic acid for post sinus surgery care: systematic review and meta-analysis

The Journal of Laryngology & Otology ◽

10.1017/s0022215116009269 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 131 (S1) ◽

pp. S2-S11 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

E Fong ◽

M Garcia ◽

C M Woods ◽

E Ooi

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Hyaluronic Acid ◽

Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Adhesion Formation ◽

Sinus Surgery ◽

Current Evidence ◽

Secondary Outcome ◽

Control Group ◽

Patient Reported

AbstractBackground:Wound healing after endoscopic sinus surgery may result in adhesion formation. Hyaluronic acid may prevent synechiae development. A systematic review was performed to evaluate the current evidence on the clinical efficacy of hyaluronic acid applied to the nasal cavity after sinus surgery.Methods:Studies using hyaluronic acid as an adjunct treatment following endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis were identified. The primary outcome was adhesion formation rates. A meta-analysis was performed on adhesion event frequency. Secondary outcome measures included other endoscopic findings and patient-reported outcomes.Results:Thirteen studies (501 patients) met the selection criteria. A meta-analysis of adhesion formation frequency on endoscopy demonstrated a lower risk ratio in the hyaluronic acid intervention group (42 out of 283 cases) compared to the control group (81 out of 282) of 0.52 (95 per cent confidence interval = 0.37–0.72). Hyaluronic acid use was not associated with any significant adverse events.Conclusion:Hyaluronic acid appears to be clinically safe and well tolerated, and may be useful in the early stages after sinus surgery to limit adhesion rate. Further research, including larger randomised controlled trials, is required to evaluate patient- and clinician-reported outcomes of hyaluronic acid post sinus surgery.

Download Full-text

Endoscopic sinus surgery in patients with cystic fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of pulmonary function

Rhinology Journal ◽

10.4193/rhino11.271 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 50 (4) ◽

pp. 360-369

Author(s):

K.I. Macdonald ◽

A. Gipsman ◽

A. Magit ◽

M. Fandino ◽

E. Massoud ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Cystic Fibrosis ◽

Pulmonary Function ◽

Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Pulmonary Function Tests ◽

Sinus Surgery ◽

Intravenous Antibiotics

Introduction: The role of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) is not clearly defined. Objective: TO perform a systematic review of subjective and objective outcomes of ESS in CF. Methods: A systematic review was performed using the keywords 'sinusitis,' 'sinus surgery,' 'nasal polyps' and 'cystic fibrosis.' The quality of papers was assessed using the NICE scoring scale. Outcomes included safety, subjective symptoms, objective endoscopy scores, days spent in hospital, courses of antibiotics, and pulmonary function tests (PFTs). Results: Nineteen studies involving 586 patients were included in the review. There were four prospective cohort trials, and three were rated as good quality. There were no major complications attributable to ESS. There was consistent evidence in four cohort studies of improved sinonasal symptoms, including nasal obstruction, facial pain, headaches, rhinorrhea and olfaction. Three studies reported conflicting results in post-operative endoscopy scores. Three studies showed a decrease in days spent in hospital, and two showed a significant decrease in courses of intravenous antibiotics. A recent study, however, did not show a difference in either days spent in hospital or courses of antibiotics. Pulmonary function tests were not improved by ESS in six cohort trials, and one small study found significant improvement. A meta-analysis of FEV1 scores confirmed no significant difference. Conclusion: THE most consistent findings of this review were that ESS in patients with CF is safe, produces symptomatic benefit, and does not consistently improve PFTs. There were more conflicting results with regards to endoscopy scores, days spent in hospital, and courses of intravenous antibiotics. Future prospective studies, utilizing validated quality of life, symptom and endoscopy scales, are needed to further elucidate the role of ESS in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis in CF patients.

Download Full-text