scholarly journals Chronic fatigue syndrome – mapping the interior

1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
MATTHEW HOTOPF ◽  
SIMON WESSELY

Over a century ago Beard referred to fatigue as the ‘Central Africa of medicine – an unexplored territory which few men enter’ (Beard, 1869). The last decade has seen major advances in our understanding of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Much is now known of the epidemiology, clinical features and prognosis of the condition (Wessely et al. 1998), and a number of recent papers have reported randomized trials of successful treatments involving cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) and graded exercise (Sharpe et al. 1996; Wearden et al. 1996; Deale et al. 1997; Fulcher & White, 1997). Despite these advances, which have defined some of the broad landmarks of the illness, and improved the care of patients, many areas remain uncharted. Several papers published in this issue of Psychological Medicine take us into such unexplored territory.

2017 ◽  
Vol 97 ◽  
pp. 45-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthonie Janse ◽  
Stephanie Nikolaus ◽  
Jan F. Wiborg ◽  
Marianne Heins ◽  
Jos W.M. van der Meer ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 65 (10) ◽  
pp. 461-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane L Cox

It has been stated that, although most chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) patients can be treated in primary care and that cognitive behaviour therapy and prescribed, graded aerobic exercise appear to be promising in outpatient management, a minority of patients will require inpatient care (Royal Colleges of Physicians, General Practitioners and Psychiatrists 1996). To date, little has been written on the need for and impact of an inpatient approach for patients with CFS. This study builds on previous work to show how patients with complex CFS responded to a specifically designed occupational therapy inpatient programme, using the principles of cognitive behaviour therapy and graded activity. A quasi-experimental study was carried out using current inpatients with those on the waiting list as a comparison. At 6 months following discharge, a significant difference between the groups in terms of symptoms and level of ability was not demonstrated. However, a significant effect was shown in patients' perceived health, length of time tired and management of the illness. Thirty-one (72%) of the inpatient group, compared with 10 (53%) of the comparison group, stated that they felt better than the previous year. Thirty-one (72%) of the inpatient group, compared with 7 (37%) of the comparison group, indicated better management of their illness. These findings give some evidence of the need for an inpatient CFS management programme for specific patients with complex CFS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document