Elizabeth Lane Furdell, Textual Healing: Essays on Medieval and Early Modern Medicine. (Studies in Medieval and Reformation Traditions: History, Culture, Religion, Ideas, 110.) Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2005. Pp. xvii, 287; black-and-white figures and 1 table. €99.

Speculum ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 81 (03) ◽  
pp. 949
The Lancet ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 393 (10173) ◽  
pp. 738-739
Author(s):  
Dániel Margócsy ◽  
Mark Somos ◽  
Stephen N Joffe

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daphna Oren-Magidor ◽  
Catherine Rider

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-93
Author(s):  
Jukka Tyrkkö

The standardisation process of English spelling largely came to its conclusion during the Early Modern period. While the progress of standardisation has been studied in both printed and manuscript texts, few studies have looked at these processes side by side, especially focusing on the same genre of writing and by using corpora that are sufficiently large for quantitative comparison. Using two Early Modern medical corpora, one based on manuscripts and the other on printed sources, this paper compares the trajectories of spelling standardisation in the two textual domains and shows that while spelling standardisation progressed in an almost linear fashion in printed texts, the manuscripts reveal a much more varied and shallow cline toward standardisation.


2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-111
Author(s):  
Greta Perletti

Abstract While the hysterical ailments of women in Shakespeare’s works have often been read from psychoanalytical standpoints, early modern medicine may provide new insights into the ‘frozen’, seemingly dead bodies of some of his heroines, such as Desdemona, Thaisa, and Hermione. In the wake of recent critical work (Peterson, Slights, Pettigrew), this paper will shed fresh light on the ‘excess’ of female physiology and on Shakespeare’s creative redeployment of some medical concepts and narratives.


Author(s):  
Hannah Newton

The history of early modern medicine often makes for depressing reading. It implies that people fell ill, took ineffective remedies, and died. This book seeks to rebalance and brighten our overall picture of early modern health by focusing on the neglected subject of recovery from illness in England, c.1580–1720. Drawing on an array of archival and printed materials, Misery to Mirth shows that recovery did exist conceptually at this time, and that it was a widely reported phenomenon. The book takes three main perspectives: the first is physiological or medical, asking what doctors and laypeople meant by recovery, and how they thought it occurred. This includes a discussion of convalescent care, a special branch of medicine designed to restore strength to the patient’s fragile body after illness. Secondly, the book adopts the viewpoint of patients themselves: it investigates how they reacted to the escape from death, the abatement of pain and suffering, and the return to normal life and work. At the heart of getting better was contrast—from ‘paine to ease, sadnesse to mirth, prison to liberty, and death to life’. The third perspective concerns the patient’s loved ones; it shows that family and friends usually shared the feelings of patients, undergoing a dramatic transformation from anguish to elation. This mirroring of experiences, known as ‘fellow-feeling’, reveals the depth of love between many individuals. Through these discussions, the book opens a window onto some of the most profound, as well as the more prosaic, aspects of early modern existence, from attitudes to life and death, to details of what convalescents ate for supper and wore in bed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document