A Canadian Perspective on the Continued Non-Ratification of the Convention on the Law of the Sea by the United States

2006 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
pp. 393-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted L. McDorman
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Law Of The Sea ◽  
The Us ◽  
Canadian Perspective ◽  
The Law

SummaryFor twenty years, both Canada and the United States were non-parties to the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (LOS Convention). In 2003, Canada finally ratified the LOS Convention, leaving the United States as the only industrialized state that was not a party to the “constitution of the oceans.” Canada's perspective on the US non-party status involves an equal measure of frustration/disappointment, appreciation/understanding, and ambivalence.

scholarly journals Controversial advertising of medicines. A comparison between Poland and the United States

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 67-79
Author(s):  
Marta Makowska
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Prescription Drugs ◽  
The United States ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Direct To Consumer ◽  
Law And Ethics ◽  
The Us ◽  
The Law ◽  
Direct To Consumer Advertising

For many years, the subject of aggressive marketing campaigns conducted by pharmaceutical companies has been raised in Poland. Drug ads are everywhere, on television, the radio, magazines and on the Internet. Therefore, it is extremely important is to ensure both their legal and ethical dimension. This article will present the differences between direct-to-consumer advertising of medicines in Poland and in the US. The dissimilarities result mainly from differences in legislation. In Poland, the law is much stricter than in the US. For example, in the United States companies are allowed to advertise prescription drugs directly to patients. In the whole of the European Union, and thus in Poland, it is strictly prohibited. The article will also present other regulations existing in Poland and in the United States and it will compare them. It will offer examples of violations of the law and ethics in the advertising of medicine in both countries. Lastly, it will briefly outline the negative consequences of unacceptable pharmaceutical marketing.

Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea and the Ronald Reagan Administration in the United States

Istoriya ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (11 (109)) ◽  
pp. 0
Author(s):  
German Gigolaev
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
United Nations ◽  
Reagan Administration ◽  
Ronald Reagan ◽  
The United States ◽  
Law Of The Sea ◽  
White House ◽  
Draft Convention ◽  
The Usa ◽  
The Law

The USA, as well as the USSR, initiated the convocation of the III UN Conference on the Law of the Sea (1973—1982). However, after the Ronald Reagan administration came to the White House, American diplomacy significantly changed its policy toward the Conference, which eventually resulted in US refusal to support the draft Convention on the Law of the Sea, which was worked out during the Conference. This behavior was in line with policy course of the Reagan administration — more aggressive than that of their predecessors. The article considers the American policy regarding Law of the Sea negotiations in the first months of Reagan's presidency, during the Tenth Session of the III UNCLOS.

The Law of the Sea Convention and Third States

1983 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 541-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke T. Lee
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Law Of The Sea ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Critical Importance ◽  
Legal Question ◽  
The Law

The decision of the United States and 22 other countries not to sign the Law of the Sea Convention in Montego Bay, Jamaica, on December 10, 1982, raises the important question of the legal effects of the. Convention upon nonsignatories (hereinafter referred to as “third states”). Will the latter be entitled to claim and enjoy treaty provisions beneficial to them, such as those pertaining to military or commercial navigation through international straits, including submerged passage and overflight rights, or will these rights be considered as contractual in nature, exercisable only by states parties? Clearly, the question is of critical importance to the regime of the law of the sea. Since there has been to date no systematic legal analysis of this important question in debates surrounding the Law of the Sea Convention, this essentially legal question has been consigned to general policy pronouncements.

Introduction to Incomplete Commodification and Its Creeping Counterpart

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie Ram ◽  
Stéphanie Hennette Vauchez
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Lived Experiences ◽  
The United States ◽  
International Norms ◽  
Human Tissues ◽  
The Us ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Frameworks

This chapter provides an overview of incomplete commodification and its creeping counterpart. The course of commodification of human tissues—including blood, sperm, and eggs—is both the same and opposite for the United States and Europe. The law on the ground in each system may be quite different, but the lived experiences of individuals providing these body products are becoming increasingly similar. Within both systems, compensation for human transplantable organs—and at least some tissues—is proscribed by law. Even where the law does not formally proscribe remuneration for body product providers, many continue to donate without payment. But monetary exchange also appears in both systems to some degree. In Europe, even though voluntary unpaid donation remains the norm, most systems allow forms of compensation. Moreover, the US prohibition on profit-seeking in body products is only partial. These similarities in policy and practices might appear commonsensical, yet they also reflect a remarkable convergence in international norms despite substantially different background assumptions and legal frameworks.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document