scholarly journals 9.18. Galactic winds in active galaxies

1998 ◽  
Vol 184 ◽  
pp. 417-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Veilleux ◽  
J. Bland-Hawthorn ◽  
G. Cecil ◽  
P. Shopbell

The effects of large-scale galactic winds in active galaxies may be far-reaching. It has been suggested that the Hubble sequence can be understood in terms of a galaxy's greater ability to sustain winds with increasing bulge-to-disk ratio. The large-scale circulation of gas associated with these galactic winds might help explain the mass-metallicity relation between galaxies and the metallicity-radius relation within galaxies. Galactic winds probably contribute non-negligibly to the cosmic X-ray background and may be involved in the quasar absorption-line phenomenon. The cosmological implications of the wind phenomenon have been widely explored in the context of proto-galaxies and quasars. The extremely energetic galactic winds that were likely associated with galaxy formation almost certainly played a key role in heating and ionizing the intergalactic medium at high redshifts and may have created the seeds for the large-scale structure we see today.

2002 ◽  
Vol 580 (2) ◽  
pp. 672-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. P. Boughn ◽  
R. G. Crittenden ◽  
G. P. Koehrsen

2003 ◽  
Vol 214 ◽  
pp. 46-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Günther Hasinger

Two X-ray observatories, the NASA observatory Chandra and the ESA mission XMM-Newton, provide powerful new diagnostics of the “hot universe”. In this article I review recent X–ray observations of the evolving universe. First indications of the warm/hot intergalactic medium, tracing out the large scale structure of the universe, have been obtained lately in sensitive Chandra and XMM-Newton high resolution absorption line spectroscopy of bright blazars. High resolution X–ray spectroscopy and imaging also provides important new constraints on the physical condition of the cooling matter in the centers of clusters, requiring major modifications to the standard cooling flow models. One possibility is, that the supermassive black hole in the giant central galaxies significantly energizes the gas in the cluster.XMM-Newton and Chandra low resolution spectroscopy detected significant Fe Kα absorption features in the spectrum of the ultraluminous, high redshift lensed broad absorption line QSO APM 08279+5255, yielding new insights in the outflow geometry and in particular indicate a supersolar Fe/O ratio. Chandra high resolution imaging spectroscopy of the nearby ultraluminous infrared galaxy and obscured QSO NGC 6240 for the first time gave evidence of two active supermassive black holes in the same galaxy, likely bound to coalesce in the course of the ongoing major merger in this galaxy.Deep X–ray surveys have shown that the cosmic X-ray background (XRB) is largely due to the accretion onto supermassive black holes, integrated over the cosmic time. These surveys have resolved more than 80 % of the 0.1–10 keV X-ray background into discrete sources. Optical spectroscopic identifications show that the sources producing the bulk of the X-ray background are a mixture of obscured (type–1) and unobscured (type–2) AGNs, as predicted by the XRB population synthesis models. A class of highly luminous type–2 AGN, so called QSO-2s, has been detected in the deepest Chandra and XMM-Newton surveys. The new Chandra AGN redshift distribution peaks at much lower redshifts (z ≈ 0.7) than that based on ROSAT data, indicating that the evolution of Seyfert galaxies occurs at significantly later cosmic time than that of QSOs.


1990 ◽  
Vol 139 ◽  
pp. 416-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Honguang Bi ◽  
P. Mészáros ◽  
A. Mészáros

In two previous publications (Mészáros and Mészáros 1988 “Paper I”; Bagoly, Mészáros, and Mészáros 1988 “Paper II”), we have studied the fluctuations of the X-ray background (XRB) expected if the XRB is produced by discrete sources distributed as galaxies. The distribution of matter was assumed to follow the large-scale structure in the form of spherical clusters (superclusters) or spherical voids. In Paper I the density contrast of XRB sources inside and outside structures was taken to be a step function of constant height, whereas in Paper II we introduced arbitrary density contrasts (independent of redshift) and allowed for a redshift evolution of the luminosity of the sources. This led to predicted angular fluctuations of the XRB, which, when we compared them with the HEAO–1 observational limit (Shafer 1983), allowed us to set limits on the type and density of structures.


1988 ◽  
Vol 130 ◽  
pp. 203-206
Author(s):  
A. Mészáros ◽  
P. Mészáros

At present there are in use three different models to characterize the large scale structure of the universe. The clustering model (Soneira and Peebles, 1978) assumes that the superclusters are high density islands in a low density sea. The void model (Joeveer and Einasto, 1978), on the other hand, assumes that the voids are isolated low density islands in a high density sea. The sponge model (Gott et al., 1986) assumes that high and low density regions occupy equal volumes, and that the high and low density regions are both connected. The straightforward way to decide among these three models is the direct investigation of the spatial distribution of the galaxies. Nevertheless, there is an essentially different observational method that may also be useful to obtain some information about these models. The X-ray background radiation (XRB) is due either to the bremsstrahlung of hot intergalactic gas, or to the sum of the radiation of unresolved discrete sources (E.G. Boldt 1987). If the “discrete” origin is correct, then obviously the actual number of sources, and hence their total intensity, may vary from one part of the sky to another. Thus, in this case one has the possibility to estimate the number of sources in a given volume from the observed isotropy of the XRB. For example, Hamilton and Helfand (1987) suggest that the number of sources must be larger than 5000/(degree)2. Any such estimate needs several assumptions. In the previous works one usually assumed that the sources were distributed completely randomly; see, e.g. Fabian (1972). Nevertheless, if the XRB is generated by young galaxies (Bookbinder et al. 1980), it is not excluded that the sources of the SRB are also grouped similarly to galaxies. Because in this case the distribution of sources of the XRB is not completely random, one may expect a different type of fluctuations in the intensity of the XRB. In addition, since the grouping may be quite different for the three structure models, the expected fluctuations may also be different. There is a chance to discriminate among them using the observed isotropy of XRB. The basic observational datum concerning the isotropy of the XRB is well-known: the fluctuations in the intensity are smaller than 3%, if 3° × 3° pixels are used Shafer (1983).


1988 ◽  
Vol 130 ◽  
pp. 539-539
Author(s):  
X. Barcons ◽  
A.C. Fabian

The clustering of the background-contributing X-ray sources is reflected in the excess (i.e., non-Poisson) fluctuations in the X-ray background (XRB). Observational limits on ΔI/I can therefore be used to constrain either the clumpiness of X-ray sources or their contribution to the XRB if their clustering properties are known (see Barcons & Fabian 1987 for details).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document