Modality, quo vadis?

2004 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 413-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Sathian

Grush's emulation theory comprises both modality-specific and amodal emulators. I suggest that the amodal variety be replaced by multisensory emulators. The key distinction is that multisensory processing retains the characteristics of individual sensory modalities, in contrast to amodal processing. The latter term is better reserved for conceptual and linguistic systems, rather than perception or emulation.

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary E Stewart ◽  
Natalie Russo ◽  
Jennifer Banks ◽  
Louisa Miller ◽  
Jacob A Burack

In this paper, we review evidence regarding differences in the types of sensory experiences  of persons with ASD with respect to both unisensory and multisensory processing. We discuss self- reports, carer questionnaires as well as perceptual processing differences found in the laboratory.  Incoming information is processed through one or more of our senses and fundamental differences in the processing of information from any sensory modality or combination of sensory modalities are likely to have cascading effects on the way individuals with ASD experience the world around them, effects that can have both positive and negative impact on a individual with ASD’s quality of life.


2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 193-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark T. Wallace ◽  
Tiffany G. Woynaroski ◽  
Ryan A. Stevenson

During our everyday lives, we are confronted with a vast amount of information from several sensory modalities. This multisensory information needs to be appropriately integrated for us to effectively engage with and learn from our world. Research carried out over the last half century has provided new insights into the way such multisensory processing improves human performance and perception; the neurophysiological foundations of multisensory function; the time course for its development; how multisensory abilities differ in clinical populations; and, most recently, the links between multisensory processing and cognitive abilities. This review summarizes the extant literature on multisensory function in typical and atypical circumstances, discusses the implications of the work carried out to date for theory and research, and points toward next steps for advancing the field.


2017 ◽  
Vol 313 (4) ◽  
pp. R305-R321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian H. Lemon

Taste stimuli have a temperature that can stimulate thermosensitive neural machinery in the mouth during gustatory experience. Although taste and oral temperature are sometimes discussed as different oral sensory modalities, there is a body of literature that demonstrates temperature is an important component and modulator of the intensity of gustatory neural and perceptual responses. Available data indicate that the influence of temperature on taste, herein referred to as “thermogustation,” can vary across taste qualities, can also vary among stimuli presumed to share a common taste quality, and is conditioned on taste stimulus concentration, with neuronal and psychophysical data revealing larger modulatory effects of temperature on gustatory responding to weakened taste solutions compared with concentrated. What is more, thermogustation is evidenced to involve interplay between mouth and stimulus temperature. Given these and other dependencies, identifying principles by which thermal input affects gustatory information flow in the nervous system may be important for ultimately unravelling the organization of neural circuits for taste and defining their involvement with multisensory processing related to flavor. Yet thermal effects are relatively understudied in gustatory neuroscience. Major gaps in our understanding of the mechanisms and consequences of thermogustation include delineating supporting receptors, the potential involvement of oral thermal and somatosensory trigeminal neurons in thermogustatory interactions, and the broader operational roles of temperature in gustatory processing. This review will discuss these and other issues in the context of the literature relevant to understanding thermogustation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 814-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Paul Noel ◽  
David Simon ◽  
Antonia Thelen ◽  
Alexander Maier ◽  
Randolph Blake ◽  
...  

The neural underpinnings of perceptual awareness have been extensively studied using unisensory (e.g., visual alone) stimuli. However, perception is generally multisensory, and it is unclear whether the neural architecture uncovered in these studies directly translates to the multisensory domain. Here, we use EEG to examine brain responses associated with the processing of visual, auditory, and audiovisual stimuli presented near threshold levels of detectability, with the aim of deciphering similarities and differences in the neural signals indexing the transition into perceptual awareness across vision, audition, and combined visual–auditory (multisensory) processing. More specifically, we examine (1) the presence of late evoked potentials (∼>300 msec), (2) the across-trial reproducibility, and (3) the evoked complexity associated with perceived versus nonperceived stimuli. Results reveal that, although perceived stimuli are associated with the presence of late evoked potentials across each of the examined sensory modalities, between-trial variability and EEG complexity differed for unisensory versus multisensory conditions. Whereas across-trial variability and complexity differed for perceived versus nonperceived stimuli in the visual and auditory conditions, this was not the case for the multisensory condition. Taken together, these results suggest that there are fundamental differences in the neural correlates of perceptual awareness for unisensory versus multisensory stimuli. Specifically, the work argues that the presence of late evoked potentials, as opposed to neural reproducibility or complexity, most closely tracks perceptual awareness regardless of the nature of the sensory stimulus. In addition, the current findings suggest a greater similarity between the neural correlates of perceptual awareness of unisensory (visual and auditory) stimuli when compared with multisensory stimuli.


2010 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Alais ◽  
Fiona Newell ◽  
Pascal Mamassian

AbstractResearch in multisensory processes has exploded over the last decade. Tremendous advances have been made in a variety of fields from single-unit neural recordings and functional brain imaging through to behaviour, perception and cognition. These diverse approaches have highlighted how the senses work together to produce a coherent multimodal representation of the external world that enables us to function better by exploiting the redundancies and complementarities provided by multiple sensory modalities. With large numbers of new students and researchers being attracted to multisensory research, and the multi-disciplinary nature of the work, our aim in this review is to provide an overview of multisensory processing that includes all fields in a single review. Our intention is to provide a comprehensive source for those interested in learning about multisensory processes, covering a variety of sensory combinations and methodologies, and tracing the path from single-unit neurophysiology through to perception and cognitive functions such as attention and speech.


2002 ◽  
Vol 144 (12) ◽  
pp. 716-727 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Schaller ◽  
H. Schwermer ◽  
D. Heim
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 7-10
Author(s):  
Jean-Pierre Wils
Keyword(s):  

Zusammenfassung. Die Ethik kann auf eine eindrucksvolle Renaissance zurückblicken. Nachdem die grossen politischen Emanzipationsprojekte ihren Glanz in den siebziger Jahren des letzten Jahrhunderts verloren hatten und sich am Horizont neue biomedizinische Entwicklungen abzeichneten (Stichwort „Gentechnologie“), war die Ethik gefragt. In einigen Fällen hatte sie vor allem eine begrenzende, also limitierende Funktion, in anderen Fällen eine erlaubende, also eine lizenzierende Funktion. Aber seit einiger Zeit wächst das Gefühl einer gewissen Ohnmacht. Die Wandlungen im Autonomie-Begriff und die Entwicklungen in der Diskussion um die Sterbehilfe können das verdeutlichen. Ein neues Menschenbild hat sich durchgesetzt, dessen Dynamik ethisch kaum mehr zu steuern ist.


Pflege ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-74
Author(s):  
Ralph Möhler
Keyword(s):  

Pflege ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-160
Author(s):  
Jörg Haslbeck
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document