Shape representation by Second-order Isomorphism and the Chorus model: SIC

1998 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 484-493
Author(s):  
Shimon Edelman

Proximal mirroring of distal similarities is, at present, the only solution to the problem of representation that is both theoretically sound (for reasons discussed in the target article) and practically feasible (as attested by the performance of the Chorus model). Augmenting the latter by a capability to refer selectively to retinotopically defined object fragments should lead to a comprehensive theory of shape processing.

Author(s):  
Jean-Claude Le´on ◽  
Rosalinda Ferrandes ◽  
Franca Giannini

The concept of product view and the corresponding required models is a basic constituent of a product development process. Integration across product views is addressed through an analysis of the key characteristics of current geometric modellers. Here, topological and geometric issues are identified and major shape modelling principles are studied. As a result, the core concepts of a framework for product view integration are proposed and justified. The notions of mixed shape representation and layered topological representation are briefly outlined as part of the proposed framework. Categories of operators enabling the required shape transformations are also shortly introduced as element of the proposed framework.


2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 212-212
Author(s):  
D. J. Kalar ◽  
P. Garrigan ◽  
P. J. Kellman

2002 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 182-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hedy Amiri ◽  
Chad J. Marsolek

According to Pylyshyn, depictive representations can be explanatory only if a certain kind of first-order isomorphism exists between the mental representations and real-world displays. What about a system with second-order isomorphism (similarities between different mental representations corresponding with similarities between different real-world displays)? Such a system may help to address whether “depictive” representations contribute to the visual nature of imagery.


2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Del Giudice

AbstractIn the first part of this response, commentators' critiques to the target article are reviewed and addressed. The main discussion topics are the role of attachment in developmental plasticity; the relationship between attachment, mating, and reproductive strategies; the existence, magnitude, and developmental timing of sex differences in attachment; the adaptiveness of insecure styles; and the neurobiology of attachment and reproduction. The model's assumptions are clarified, and a number of methodological issues that can confound the interpretation of research findings are examined. In the second part, various proposals made by commentators are synthesized, and directions for future research and theoretical improvement are outlined. In addition, the issue of disorganized and fearful attachment is tentatively addressed. It is argued that different theoretical perspectives are converging toward a consistent and comprehensive theory of human reproductive strategies.


2022 ◽  
Vol 105 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Mo Lihm ◽  
Cheol-Hwan Park

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Danks

AbstractThe target article uses a mathematical framework derived from Bayesian decision making to demonstrate suboptimal decision making but then attributes psychological reality to the framework components. Rahnev & Denison's (R&D) positive proposal thus risks ignoring plausible psychological theories that could implement complex perceptual decision making. We must be careful not to slide from success with an analytical tool to the reality of the tool components.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document