Medical Technology Assessment Directory, Goodman Clifford (Ed.), Council on Health Care Technology, Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1988, 662 pp., $250.

1989 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 673-675
Author(s):  
Miriam Orleans ◽  
John P. Bunker
1988 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 627-628

The Council on Health Care Technology of the Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences, has published the Medical Technology Assessment Directory. The 712 page directory is an extensive compilation and description of activities in the field.The publication is designed to help crystallize the subject matter of medical technology assessment and to identify and serve the emerging network of individuals, organizations, and institutions that generate and use technology assessments. The directory provides access to assessment people, programs, and resources to keep users up to date on developments in the field. It should be useful for reviewing available assessments of a particular technology before beginning an assessment project or making a decision on coverage, reimbursement, acquisition, medical practice, or standard setting.The directory includes profiles of 68 assessment programs and a total of approximately 3,200 bibliographic citations of their assessment reports. These programs are located in public and private sector organizations, including professional, scientific, and industry associations, biomedical research institutions, educational institutions, government advisory bodies, regulatory agencies, third party payers, policy institutes, and for-profit corporations.


1989 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick Mosteller ◽  
Elisabeth Burdick

This article presents an overview of technology assessment in the United States. The authors argue that while there are numerous institutions carrying out assessments, the United States requires an overall plan that would provide a national system for technology assessment. If technology assessment were more organized and systematized, the authors argue, it would be more efficient and would reach the public and the medical world effectively.


2004 ◽  
Vol 86 (6) ◽  
pp. 1305-1314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin J. Bozic ◽  
Read G. Pierce ◽  
James H. Herndon

1991 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-82
Author(s):  
Anne Osborne Kilpatrick ◽  
Krishna S. Dhir ◽  
John M. Sanders

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document