INPUT, INTERACTION, AND SECOND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT

1999 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 557-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison Mackey
Keyword(s):  
Second Language ◽  
Language Development ◽  
Active Participation ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Conversational Interaction ◽  
Grammatical Development ◽  
Second Language Development ◽  
Adult Esl ◽  
Interaction Hypothesis ◽  
Negotiated Interaction

This study examines the relationship between different types of conversational interaction and SLA. Long's (1996) updated version of the interactionist hypothesis claims that implicit negative feedback, which can be obtained through negotiated interaction, facilitates SLA. Similar claims for the benefits of negotiation have been made by Pica (1994) and Gass (1997). Some support for the interaction hypothesis has been provided by studies that have explored the effects of interaction on production (Gass & Varonis, 1994), on lexical acquisition (Ellis, Tanaka, & Yamazaki, 1994), on the short-term outcomes of pushed output (see Swain, 1995), and for specific interactional features such as recasts (Long, Inagaki, & Ortega, 1998; Mackey & Philp, 1998). However, other studies have not found effects for interaction on grammatical development (Loschky, 1994). The central question addressed by the current study was: Can conversational interaction facilitate second language development? The study employed a pretest-posttest design. Adult ESL learners (N = 34) of varying L1 backgrounds were divided into four experimental groups and one control group. They took part in task-based interaction. Research questions focused on the developmental outcomes of taking part in various types of interaction. Active participation in interaction and the developmental level of the learner were considered. Results of this study support claims concerning a link between interaction and grammatical development and highlight the importance of active participation in the interaction.

RECASTS AND SECOND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT

2003 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Leeman
Keyword(s):  
Second Language ◽  
Language Development ◽  
Negative Feedback ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Negative Evidence ◽  
Communicative Interaction ◽  
Positive Evidence ◽  
Second Language Development ◽  
Multiple Variables ◽  
Better Than

Recasts have figured prominently in recent SLA research, with studies documenting significant advantages for learners exposed to this type of negative feedback. Although some researchers have suggested that such findings imply a beneficial role for negative evidence (i.e., information regarding the impossibility of certain utterances in the language being learned), the source of these benefits has not been explored directly, as multiple variables are conflated in recasts. Specifically, recasts not only offer implicit negative evidence, but they also provide positive evidence. Moreover, recasts are believed to make this positive evidence especially salient. In the present study, 74 learners of L2 Spanish engaged in communicative interaction with the researcher in one of the following conditions: (a) recasts (i.e., negative evidence and enhanced salience of positive evidence), (b) negative evidence, (c) enhanced salience of positive evidence, and (d) unenhanced positive evidence (control). Only the recast and enhanced-salience groups performed significantly better than the control group on posttreatment measures, which suggests that the utility of recasts is derived at least in part from enhanced salience of positive evidence and that the implicit negative evidence they seem to provide may not be a crucial factor.

scholarly journals HOW DO LEARNERS PERCEIVE INTERACTIONAL FEEDBACK?

2000 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 471-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison Mackey ◽  
Susan Gass ◽  
Kim McDonough
Keyword(s):  
Second Language ◽  
Foreign Language ◽  
Dyadic Interaction ◽  
Conversational Interaction ◽  
Interesting Issue ◽  
Lexical Semantic ◽  
Interaction Hypothesis ◽  
Negotiated Interaction ◽  
L2 Development

Theoretical claims about the benefits of conversational interaction have been made by Gass (1997), Long (1996), Pica (1994), and others. The Interaction Hypothesis suggests that negotiated interaction can facilitate SLA and that one reason for this could be that, during interaction, learners may receive feedback on their utterances. An interesting issue, which has challenged interactional research, concerns how learners perceive feedback and whether their perceptions affect their subsequent L2 development. The present research addresses the first of these issues–learners' perceptions about interactional feedback. The study, involving 10 learners of English as a second language and 7 learners of Italian as a foreign language, explores learners' perceptions about feedback provided to them through task-based dyadic interaction. Learners received feedback focused on a range of morphosyntactic, lexical, and phonological forms. After completing the tasks, learners watched videotapes of their previous interactions and were asked to introspect about their thoughts at the time the original interactions were in progress. The results showed that learners were relatively accurate in their perceptions about lexical, semantic, and phonological feedback. However, morphosyntactic feedback was generally not perceived as such. Furthermore, the nature as well as the content of the feedback may have affected learners' perceptions.

scholarly journals PROSES PEMEROLEHAN BAHASA: DARI KEMAMPUAN HINGGA KEKURANGMAMPUAN BERBAHASA

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohmani Nur Indah
Keyword(s):  
Second Language ◽  
Language Acquisition ◽  
Language Development ◽  
Language Disorder ◽  
Applied Linguistics ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Second Language Development ◽  
The Relationship

Studies on language acquisition become the pillar of Psycholinguistics as a branch of Applied Linguistics that deals with the relationship between human’s thought and language as well as how human beings comprehend, acquire and develop their language. Language acquisition does not merely involve children’s first or second language development, but also temporer language disorder –which does not belong to permanent language disorder. Deviation on language development to some extent gets little attention from psycholinguists. Most references on psychology of language discuss language disorder in general, whereas the current issues on this area are still rarely found. The following article deciphers what and how language acquisition can be done and cannot be completed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document