The motion of a non-conducting sphere through a conducting fluid in a magnetic cross-field

1963 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 615-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. S. S. Ludford ◽  
M. P. Singh

AbstractThe title problem for a perfectly conducting sphere was considered by Stewartson(6). Here we use a different method and a more realistic assumption concerning the sphere. Although the flow is still ultimately cylindrical, there is no longer a column of fluid which moves with the sphere as if solid. There is no reason to expect that in practice the flow will break away into eddies. In fact the same is true in Stewartson's case, once his results are corrected.

1963 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 625-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. S. S. Ludford ◽  
M. P. Singh

AbstractErrors in a previous discussion (4) of the title problem for a perfectly conducting sphere are corrected. An alternative method of determining the ultimate motion is described for both a perfectly conducting and a non-conducting sphere moving along the magnetic field.


Author(s):  
K. Stewartson

ABSTRACTThe steady motion of a perfectly conducting sphere in an inviscid conducting fluid in the presence of a strong magnetic field is discussed. It is shown that if the fluid velocity is ultimately steady then it is two-dimensional, and a cylinder of fluid whose generators are parallel to the direction of the field moves with the sphere as if solid. The streamlines outside are straight lines if the sphere moves in the direction of the field but have to execute sharp turns if it moves at right angles to the field. The motion to be expected in practice is discussed using an analogy.


This paper considers the slow flow of a viscous, conducting fluid past a non-conducting sphere at whose centre is a magnetic pole. The magnetic Reynolds number is assumed to be small, and the modifications to the classical Stokes flow and the free magnetic pole field are obtained for an arbitrary Hartmann number. The total drag D on the sphere has been calculated, and the ratio D / D s determined as a function of the Hartmann number M , where D s is the Stokes drag. In particular ( D — D s )/ D s = 37/210 M 2 + O ( M 4 ) for small M and ( D — D s )/ Ds ~ 0·7205 M - 1 as M → ∞.


Author(s):  
G. D. Gagne ◽  
M. F. Miller

We recently described an artificial substrate system which could be used to optimize labeling parameters in EM immunocytochemistry (ICC). The system utilizes blocks of glutaraldehyde polymerized bovine serum albumin (BSA) into which an antigen is incorporated by a soaking procedure. The resulting antigen impregnated blocks can then be fixed and embedded as if they are pieces of tissue and the effects of fixation, embedding and other parameters on the ability of incorporated antigen to be immunocyto-chemically labeled can then be assessed. In developing this system further, we discovered that the BSA substrate can also be dried and then sectioned for immunolabeling with or without prior chemical fixation and without exposing the antigen to embedding reagents. The effects of fixation and embedding protocols can thus be evaluated separately.


1956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore R. Sarbin ◽  
Donal S. Jones
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamara Feldman

This paper is a contribution to the growing literature on the role of projective identification in understanding couples' dynamics. Projective identification as a defence is well suited to couples, as intimate partners provide an ideal location to deposit unwanted parts of the self. This paper illustrates how projective identification functions differently depending on the psychological health of the couple. It elucidates how healthier couples use projective identification more as a form of communication, whereas disturbed couples are inclined to employ it to invade and control the other, as captured by Meltzer's concept of "intrusive identification". These different uses of projective identification affect couples' capacities to provide what Bion called "containment". In disturbed couples, partners serve as what Meltzer termed "claustrums" whereby projections are not contained, but imprisoned or entombed in the other. Applying the concept of claustrum helps illuminate common feelings these couples express, such as feeling suffocated, stifled, trapped, held hostage, or feeling as if the relationship is killing them. Finally, this paper presents treatment challenges in working with more disturbed couples.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document