A general theory of unsteady boundary-layer flows

1967 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 1309-1325 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. N. Sarma
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Main Stream ◽  
Physical Situation ◽  
Power Functions ◽  
Boundary Layer Flows ◽  
Times Series ◽  
Small Times ◽  
Dimensional Boundary ◽  
Image Position ◽  
The Given

AbstractThe unsteady two-dimensional boundary-layer flows are investigated, using the equations linearized as by Lighthill. It is assumed, unlike separable forms and power functions taken by Sarma, that the perturbations which cause the unsteadiness in the flow are arbitrary functions of the distance along the flow and the time. In addition to the Reynolds number, it is explicitly assumed that the flow for large times is defined by a set of parameters likeξ = φ/U0, U0(x) and φ (x are functions associated with the main stream in steady flow, λ(x, t) represents a perturbation, t time and x is the distance along the surface. This particular assumption is essentially an idea that is suggested by the work of Sarma. In solving the equations a number of free constants and arbitrary functions are used, which will be specified according to the given physical situation. For large times series solutions are assumed in terms of the above parameters and ultimately sets of differential equations are obtained in a single variable. Thus the theory makes the problem ready for computational work. For small times using the steady state solutions given in this paper, we proceed along the same lines as given in the work of Sarma. The velocity as well as thermal boundary layers are analysed in this paper.

Jeffery-Hamel boundary-layer flows over curved beds

1988 ◽  
Vol 186 ◽  
pp. 583-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. M. Eagles
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Flow Field ◽  
Film Flow ◽  
Local Approximation ◽  
Main Stream ◽  
Streamwise Direction ◽  
Boundary Layer Flows ◽  
Boundary Layer Equations ◽  
First Approximation ◽  
Local Value

We find certain exact solutions of Jeffery-Hamel type for the boundary-layer equations for film flow over certain beds. If β is the angle of the bed with the horizontal and S is the arclength these beds have equation sin β = (const.)S−3, and allow a description of flows on concave and convex beds. The velocity profiles are markedly different from the semi-Poiseuille flow on a plane bed.We also find a class of beds in which the Jeffery-Hamel flows appear as a first approximation throughout the flow field, which is infinite in streamwise extent. Since the parameter γ specifying the Jeffery-Hamel flow varies in the streamwise direction this allows a description of flows over curved beds which are slowly varying, as described in the theory, in such a way that the local approximation is that Jeffery-Hamel flow with the local value of γ. This allows the description of flows with separation and reattachment of the main stream in some cases.

An Assessment of Three-Dimensional Turbulent Boundary Layer Prediction Methods

1973 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 415-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Wheeler ◽  
J. P. Johnston
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Eddy Viscosity ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Boundary Layer Flows ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Eddy Viscosity Model ◽  
Separating Flow ◽  
Dimensional Boundary ◽  
Stress Models

Predictions have been made for a variety of experimental three-dimensional boundary layer flows with a single finite difference method which was used with three different turbulent stress models: (i) an eddy viscosity model, (ii) the “Nash” model, and (iii) the “Bradshaw” model. For many purposes, even the simplest stress model (eddy viscosity) was adequate to predict the mean velocity field. On the other hand, the profile of shear stress direction was not correctly predicted in one case by any model tested. The high sensitivity of the predicted results to free stream pressure gradient in separating flow cases is demonstrated.

Application of a General Finite-Difference Method to Boundary Layer Flows

1972 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 146-152
Author(s):  
S. D. Katotakis ◽  
J. Vlachopoulos
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Finite Difference ◽  
Boundary Layer Flows ◽  
Boundary Layer Problem ◽  
Boundary Layer Equations ◽  
Temperature Boundary ◽  
Dimensional Boundary ◽  
Finite Difference Solution ◽  
Suction Or Injection ◽  
Layer Problem

A straight-forward and general finite-difference solution of the boundary layer equations is presented. Several problems are examined for laminar flow conditions. These include velocity and temperature boundary layers over a flat plate, linearly retarded flows and several cases of suction or injection. The results obtained are in excellent agreement with existing accurate solutions. It appears that any kind of steady, two-dimensional boundary layer problem can be solved thus with accuracy and speed.

A Theory for Fine Particle Deposition in Two-Dimensional Boundary Layer Flows and Application to Gas Turbines

1982 ◽  
Vol 104 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Mengu¨turk ◽  
E. F. Sverdrup
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Gas Turbines ◽  
Particle Deposition ◽  
Fine Particles ◽  
Magnitude Estimate ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Boundary Layer Flows ◽  
Order Of Magnitude ◽  
Dimensional Boundary ◽  
Layer Flow

A theory is presented to predict deposition rates of fine particles in two-dimensional compressible boundary layer flows. The mathematical model developed accounts for diffusion due to both molecular and turbulent fluctuations in the boundary layer flow. Particle inertia is taken into account in establishing the condition on particle flux near the surface. Gravitational settling and thermophoresis are not considered. The model assumes that the fraction of particles sticking upon arrival at the surface is known, and thus, treats it as a given parameter. The theory is compared with a number of pipe and cascade experiments, and a reasonable agreement is obtained. A detailed application of the model to a turbine is also presented. Various regimes of particle transport are identified, and the range of validity of the model is discussed. An order of magnitude estimate is obtained for the time the turbine stage can be operated without requiring cleaning.

The three-dimensional laminar boundary layer on a flat plate

1965 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 587-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Sowerby
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Flat Plate ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Main Stream ◽  
Dimensional Parameter ◽  
Stress Components ◽  
Dimensional Boundary ◽  
Layer Flow ◽  
Limiting Streamlines

A series expansion is derived for the three-dimensional boundary-layer flow over a flat plate, arising from a general main-stream flow over the plate. The series involved are calculated as far as terms of order ξ2, where ξ is a non-dimensional parameter defining distance measured from the leading edge of the plate. The results are applied to an example in which the main stream arises from the disturbance of a uniform stream by a circular cylinder mounted downstream from the leading edge of the plate, the axis of the cylinder being normal to the plate. Calculations are made for shear stress components on the plate, and for the deviation of direction of the limiting streamlines from those in the main stream.

Receptivity mechanisms in three-dimensional boundary-layer flows

2009 ◽  
Vol 618 ◽  
pp. 209-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
LARS-UVE SCHRADER ◽  
LUCA BRANDT ◽  
DAN S. HENNINGSON
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Free Stream ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Nonlinear Process ◽  
Transition To Turbulence ◽  
Boundary Layer Flows ◽  
Free Stream Turbulence ◽  
Dimensional Boundary ◽  
Layer Flow

Receptivity in three-dimensional boundary-layer flow to localized surface roughness and free-stream vorticity is studied. A boundary layer of Falkner–Skan–Cooke type with favourable pressure gradient is considered to model the flow slightly downstream of a swept-wing leading edge. In this region, stationary and travelling crossflow instability dominates over other instability types. Three scenarios are investigated: the presence of low-amplitude chordwise localized, spanwise periodic roughness elements on the plate, the impingement of a weak vortical free-stream mode on the boundary layer and the combination of both disturbance sources. Three receptivity mechanisms are identified: steady receptivity to roughness, unsteady receptivity to free-stream vorticity and unsteady receptivity to vortical modes scattered at the roughness. Both roughness and vortical modes provide efficient direct receptivity mechanisms for stationary and travelling crossflow instabilities. We find that stationary crossflow modes dominate for free-stream turbulence below a level of about 0.5%, whereas higher turbulence levels will promote the unsteady receptivity mechanism. Under the assumption of small amplitudes of the roughness and the free-stream disturbance, the unsteady receptivity process due to scattering of free-stream vorticity at the roughness has been found to give small initial disturbance amplitudes in comparison to the direct mechanism for free-stream modes. However, in many environments free-stream vorticity and roughness may excite interacting unstable stationary and travelling crossflow waves. This nonlinear process may rapidly lead to large disturbance amplitudes and promote transition to turbulence.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document