An Assessment of Three-Dimensional Turbulent Boundary Layer Prediction Methods

1973 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 415-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Wheeler ◽  
J. P. Johnston
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Eddy Viscosity ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Boundary Layer Flows ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Eddy Viscosity Model ◽  
Separating Flow ◽  
Dimensional Boundary ◽  
Stress Models

Predictions have been made for a variety of experimental three-dimensional boundary layer flows with a single finite difference method which was used with three different turbulent stress models: (i) an eddy viscosity model, (ii) the “Nash” model, and (iii) the “Bradshaw” model. For many purposes, even the simplest stress model (eddy viscosity) was adequate to predict the mean velocity field. On the other hand, the profile of shear stress direction was not correctly predicted in one case by any model tested. The high sensitivity of the predicted results to free stream pressure gradient in separating flow cases is demonstrated.

A comparison of several eddy viscosity turbulence models in two and three dimensional boundary layer flows

1994 ◽  
Vol 98 (973) ◽  
pp. 73-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. W. C. Leung ◽  
L. C. Squire
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Eddy Viscosity ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Boundary Layer Flows ◽  
Layer Method ◽  
Boundary Layer Method ◽  
Dimensional Boundary ◽  
Anisotropic Form

SummaryFour flow cases are calculated using a boundary layer method with five turbulence models. The Johnson-King model, in particular, is modified and two variant forms are used in the present work. The variant forms involve an anisotropic form of three-dimensional eddy viscosity formulations and a modification in the outer viscosity expression. It is found that the Johnson-King model generally performs very well as compared to the others, and the variant forms provide further improvement in most cases.

Receptivity mechanisms in three-dimensional boundary-layer flows

2009 ◽  
Vol 618 ◽  
pp. 209-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
LARS-UVE SCHRADER ◽  
LUCA BRANDT ◽  
DAN S. HENNINGSON
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Free Stream ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Nonlinear Process ◽  
Transition To Turbulence ◽  
Boundary Layer Flows ◽  
Free Stream Turbulence ◽  
Dimensional Boundary ◽  
Layer Flow

Receptivity in three-dimensional boundary-layer flow to localized surface roughness and free-stream vorticity is studied. A boundary layer of Falkner–Skan–Cooke type with favourable pressure gradient is considered to model the flow slightly downstream of a swept-wing leading edge. In this region, stationary and travelling crossflow instability dominates over other instability types. Three scenarios are investigated: the presence of low-amplitude chordwise localized, spanwise periodic roughness elements on the plate, the impingement of a weak vortical free-stream mode on the boundary layer and the combination of both disturbance sources. Three receptivity mechanisms are identified: steady receptivity to roughness, unsteady receptivity to free-stream vorticity and unsteady receptivity to vortical modes scattered at the roughness. Both roughness and vortical modes provide efficient direct receptivity mechanisms for stationary and travelling crossflow instabilities. We find that stationary crossflow modes dominate for free-stream turbulence below a level of about 0.5%, whereas higher turbulence levels will promote the unsteady receptivity mechanism. Under the assumption of small amplitudes of the roughness and the free-stream disturbance, the unsteady receptivity process due to scattering of free-stream vorticity at the roughness has been found to give small initial disturbance amplitudes in comparison to the direct mechanism for free-stream modes. However, in many environments free-stream vorticity and roughness may excite interacting unstable stationary and travelling crossflow waves. This nonlinear process may rapidly lead to large disturbance amplitudes and promote transition to turbulence.

scholarly journals Cancellation of Tollmien–Schlichting waves with surface heating

2021 ◽  
Vol 128 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgia S. Brennan ◽  
Jitesh S. B. Gajjar ◽  
Richard E. Hewitt
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Asymptotic Methods ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Exact Formula ◽  
Surface Heating ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Boundary Layer Flows ◽  
Dimensional Boundary ◽  
Tollmien Schlichting ◽  
Layer Flow

AbstractTwo-dimensional boundary layer flows in quiet disturbance environments are known to become unstable to Tollmien–Schlichting waves. The experimental work of Liepmann et al. (J Fluid Mech 118:187–200, 1982), Liepmann and Nosenchuck (J Fluid Mech 118:201–204, 1982) showed how it is possible to control and reduce unstable Tollmien–Schlichting wave amplitudes using unsteady surface heating. We consider the problem of an oncoming planar compressible subsonic boundary layer flow with a three-dimensional vibrator mounted on a flat plate, and with surface heating present. It is shown using asymptotic methods based on triple-deck theory that it is possible to choose an unsteady surface heating distribution to cancel out the response due to the vibrator. An approximation based on the exact formula is used successfully in numerical computations to confirm the findings. The results presented here are a generalisation of the analogous results for the two-dimensional problem in Brennan et al. (J Fluid Mech 909:A16-1, 2020).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document