The Quantities of Herbage Eaten by Grazing Dairy Cows

1955 ◽  
Vol 1955 ◽  
pp. 45-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. S. MacLusky

The herbage dry matter intake of grazing animals may be estimated by chemical marker and faecal analysis methods (Raymond, 1954) or by pasture sampling methods.Pasture sampling methods generally involve two main difficulties. The first is the low precision resulting from the variability of pasture yields. When intake is estimated from the difference between the yields of herbage on a given area sampled before and after the grazing period, the estimate bears the error variances of both the sample means. The second difficulty lies in ensuring that the estimated difference in yields is the true difference due to consumption. The samples must be cut below the level to which the animal can graze, and the amount of herbage growth during the grazing period must be estimated and allowed for. Growth can be estimated from the difference between the yield of herbage before grazing and the yield of protected herbage at the end of the grazing period.

2019 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 2985-2999 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Rombach ◽  
K.-H. Südekum ◽  
A. Münger ◽  
F. Schori

animal ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 596-609 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.F. O’Neill ◽  
E. Ruelle ◽  
M. O’Donovan ◽  
L. Shalloo ◽  
F.J. Mulligan ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 57 (7) ◽  
pp. 1277 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Wright ◽  
M. J. Auldist ◽  
E. Kennedy ◽  
N. Galvin ◽  
F. R. Dunshea ◽  
...  

Dry matter intake and feeding behaviour were measured in grazing dairy cows fed partial mixed rations with (PMR+C) and without (PMR–C) canola meal. In spring (early lactation), 32 Holstein–Friesian dairy cows were offered two amounts of the two supplement treatments in a two × two factorial arrangement of treatments for 24 days. Amounts of supplement were low (8 kg DM/cow.day) versus high (14 kg DM/cow.day). The PMR–C ration comprised wheat grain (59.5%, DM basis), maize grain (18.9%) and lucerne hay (21.6%). The PMR+C ration was the same, except some wheat grain was substituted with canola meal (21.6%). Both rations were isoenergetic, with a grain to forage ratio of 78 : 22 (DM basis). All cows were offered a low pasture allowance of 10 kg DM/cow.day to ground level. Replacing some wheat in a ration with canola meal increased pasture and total eating time. Dry matter intake did not differ between PMR–C and PMR+C cows. The present experiment also demonstrated that altering the amount of supplement did not influence the increase in eating time that occurred as a result of the inclusion of canola meal. Increasing the amount of supplement reduced pasture intake as a result of a reduction in grazing time and grazing intensity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document