scholarly journals Factors Affecting Pasture Intake and Total Dry Matter Intake in Grazing Dairy Cows

2000 ◽  
Vol 83 (10) ◽  
pp. 2301-2309 ◽  
Author(s):  
O.P. Vazquez ◽  
T.R. Smith
2019 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 2985-2999 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Rombach ◽  
K.-H. Südekum ◽  
A. Münger ◽  
F. Schori

animal ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 596-609 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.F. O’Neill ◽  
E. Ruelle ◽  
M. O’Donovan ◽  
L. Shalloo ◽  
F.J. Mulligan ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 57 (7) ◽  
pp. 1277 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Wright ◽  
M. J. Auldist ◽  
E. Kennedy ◽  
N. Galvin ◽  
F. R. Dunshea ◽  
...  

Dry matter intake and feeding behaviour were measured in grazing dairy cows fed partial mixed rations with (PMR+C) and without (PMR–C) canola meal. In spring (early lactation), 32 Holstein–Friesian dairy cows were offered two amounts of the two supplement treatments in a two × two factorial arrangement of treatments for 24 days. Amounts of supplement were low (8 kg DM/cow.day) versus high (14 kg DM/cow.day). The PMR–C ration comprised wheat grain (59.5%, DM basis), maize grain (18.9%) and lucerne hay (21.6%). The PMR+C ration was the same, except some wheat grain was substituted with canola meal (21.6%). Both rations were isoenergetic, with a grain to forage ratio of 78 : 22 (DM basis). All cows were offered a low pasture allowance of 10 kg DM/cow.day to ground level. Replacing some wheat in a ration with canola meal increased pasture and total eating time. Dry matter intake did not differ between PMR–C and PMR+C cows. The present experiment also demonstrated that altering the amount of supplement did not influence the increase in eating time that occurred as a result of the inclusion of canola meal. Increasing the amount of supplement reduced pasture intake as a result of a reduction in grazing time and grazing intensity.


Author(s):  
T. W. J. Keady ◽  
J. J. Murphy

In general cows have higher intakes and higher milk yields when outdoors grazing pasture compared to indoors consuming grass silage. However, this observation is not valid as a direct comparison of grass and silage due to the following reasons. Firstly, the cows consuming the silage and grass are usually at different stages of lactation and secondly the silage has not been produced from the herbage being grazed. There is little information available in the literature comparing the intakes of grass and silage harvested from the same sward at the same stage of maturity when fed to lactating dairy animals at similar stages of lactation. The present study was initiated as part of a series of studies at this Institute, to evaluate factors affecting silage intake. The main aims of this study were to determine the actual effect which ensiling “per se” had firstly on dry matter intake and secondly on animal performance by the lactating dairy cow.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document