Vernier acuities of neurons in area 17 of cat visual cortex: Their relation to stimulus length and velocity, orientation selectivity, and receptive-field structure

1989 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. V. Swindale ◽  
M. S. Cynader
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Receptive Field ◽  
Response Threshold ◽  
Orientation Tuning ◽  
Area 17 ◽  
Simple Cells ◽  
Tuning Curves ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Stimulus Length ◽  
In Cells

AbstractThe sensitivity of neurons in area 17 of the cat's visual cortex to vernier offset was expressed as the percentage reduction in response caused by the introduction of a given offset into a bar stimulus moving across the receptive field. There was a wide variation in sensitivity: in some cells response could be halved by an offset equal to a fifth of receptive-field width (defined as twice the standard deviation of a Gaussian curve fitted to the response profile), while other cells showed no sensitivity. The highest absolute sensitivities of complex and simple cells were similar, although most cells with poor sensitivity were complex.Sensitivity was largely unaffected by changes in stimulus velocity and stimulus length, although there was a tendency for sensitivity to increase with decreasing bar length.Comparisons of orientation tuning curves with vernier tuning curves showed that the response to a vernier stimulus approximated the response to a single bar of the same overall length and an orientation equal to that of a line joining the midpoints of each bar. This was true for a wide range of sensitivity values.Vernier sensitivity was correlated with a measure of length summation H, which is positive when there is net facilitation between the bars, and negative when there is net inhibition. Vernier sensitivity was highest in cells with large values of H, and least in cells where H was negative.We examined a linear model of the simple cell receptive field which, together with a variable response threshold, was able to explain the correlation between vernier acuity and length summation. Although this model accounted qualitatively for many of our findings, the majority of simple cells had tuning curves that were sharper than the predicted ones. This suggests that there are nonlinearities in the behavior of many simple cells whose effect is to increase the sharpness of orientation tuning and consequently vernier sensitivity.

scholarly journals Development of orientation tuning in simple cells of primary visual cortex

2012 ◽  
Vol 107 (9) ◽  
pp. 2506-2516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bartlett D. Moore ◽  
Ralph D. Freeman
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Receptive Field ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Orientation Selectivity ◽  
Orientation Tuning ◽  
Simple Cells ◽  
Hierarchical Processing ◽  
Tuning Curves ◽  
Linear Connections ◽  
Basic Features

Orientation selectivity and its development are basic features of visual cortex. The original model of orientation selectivity proposes that elongated simple cell receptive fields are constructed from convergent input of an array of lateral geniculate nucleus neurons. However, orientation selectivity of simple cells in the visual cortex is generally greater than the linear contributions based on projections from spatial receptive field profiles. This implies that additional selectivity may arise from intracortical mechanisms. The hierarchical processing idea implies mainly linear connections, whereas cortical contributions are generally considered to be nonlinear. We have explored development of orientation selectivity in visual cortex with a focus on linear and nonlinear factors in a population of anesthetized 4-wk postnatal kittens and adult cats. Linear contributions are estimated from receptive field maps by which orientation tuning curves are generated and bandwidth is quantified. Nonlinear components are estimated as the magnitude of the power function relationship between responses measured from drifting sinusoidal gratings and those predicted from the spatial receptive field. Measured bandwidths for kittens are slightly larger than those in adults, whereas predicted bandwidths are substantially broader. These results suggest that relatively strong nonlinearities in early postnatal stages are substantially involved in the development of orientation tuning in visual cortex.

scholarly journals Receptive Fields and Response Properties of Neurons in Layer 4 of Ferret Visual Cortex

2003 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 1003-1015 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Martin Usrey ◽  
Michael P. Sceniak ◽  
Barbara Chapman
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Receptive Field ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Field Structure ◽  
Orientation Selectivity ◽  
Stimulus Orientation ◽  
Orientation Tuning ◽  
Simple Cells ◽  
Response Properties ◽  
Layer 4

The ferret has become a model animal for studies exploring the development of the visual system. However, little is known about the receptive-field structure and response properties of neurons in the adult visual cortex of the ferret. We performed single-unit recordings from neurons in layer 4 of adult ferret primary visual cortex to determine the receptive-field structure and visual-response properties of individual neurons. In particular, we asked what is the spatiotemporal structure of receptive fields of layer 4 neurons and what is the orientation selectivity of layer 4 neurons? Receptive fields of layer 4 neurons were mapped using a white-noise stimulus; orientation selectivity was determined using drifting, sine-wave gratings. Our results show that most neurons (84%) within layer 4 are simple cells with elongated, spatially segregated,on and off subregions. These neurons are also selective for stimulus orientation; peaks in orientation-tuning curves have, on average, a half-width at half-maximum response of 21.5 ± 1.2° (mean ± SD). The remaining neurons in layer 4 (16%) lack orientation selectivity and have center/surround receptive fields. Although the organization of geniculate inputs to layer 4 differs substantially between ferret and cat, our results demonstrate that, like in the cat, most neurons in ferret layer 4 are orientation-selective simple cells.

Cat area 17. III. Response properties and orientation anisotropies of corticotectal cells

1986 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 1088-1101 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. G. Weyand ◽  
J. G. Malpeli ◽  
C. Lee ◽  
H. D. Schwark
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Orientation Tuning ◽  
Simple Relationship ◽  
Area 17 ◽  
Vertical Meridian ◽  
Complex Cells ◽  
Receptive Field Properties ◽  
Stimulus Length ◽  
Special Complex

The receptive field properties of antidromically identified corticotectal (CT) cells in area 17 were explored in the paralyzed, anesthetized cat. To compare these with another population of infragranular cells, we also examined the receptive field properties of cells in layer 6. Sixty percent of our sample of CT cells showed increased response to increased stimulus length (length summation) and were classified as standard complex cells. The other 40% showed little or no length summation, were generally end stopped, and were classified as special complex cells. Standard and special complex CT cells have complementary orientation anisotropies: the distribution of orientation preferences of standard complex cells is biased toward obliquely oriented stimuli, whereas special complex cells are biased toward horizontally and vertically oriented stimuli. The receptive fields of the cells in our sample were primarily along the horizontal meridian so we cannot determine if these anisotropies are defined relative to the vertical meridian or relative to the meridian passing through the receptive field. The effects of these anisotropies in preferred orientation are minimized by the broad orientation tuning of CT cells. There was no simple relationship between the direction bias of CT cells and the reported direction bias of tectal cells. In contrast to the heterogeneity of corticotectal cells, layer 6 cells uniformly showed strong length summation, tight orientation tuning, and little spontaneous activity.

RECEPTIVE FIELD PROPERTIES OF NEAR NEIGHBOR ORIENTATION SELECTIVE NEURONS IN THE VISUAL CORTEX: A MODELING STUDY

2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (01n02) ◽  
pp. 31-40
Author(s):  
BASABI BHAUMIK ◽  
ALOK AGARWAL ◽  
MANISH MANOHAR
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Receptive Field ◽  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Near Neighbor ◽  
Orientation Tuning ◽  
Cortical Cells ◽  
Orientation Preference ◽  
Receptive Field Properties ◽  
Wide Range

The primary visual cortex is organized into clusters of cells having similar receptive fields (RFs). A purely feedforward model has been shown to produce realistic simple cell receptive fields. The modeled cells capture a wide range of receptive field properties of orientation selective cortical cells. We have analyzed the responses of 78 nearby cell pairs to study which RF properties are clustered. Orientation preference shows strongest clustering. Orientation tuning width (hwhh) and tuning height (spikes/sec) at the preferred orientation are not as tightly clustered. Spatial frequency is also not as tightly clustered and RF phase has the least clustering. Clustering property of orientation preference, orientation tuning height and width depend on the location of cells in the orientation map. No such location dependence is observed for spatial frequency and RF phase. Our results agree well with experimental data.

scholarly journals Prediction of Orientation Selectivity from Receptive Field Architecture in Simple Cells of Cat Visual Cortex

Neuron ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 263-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilan Lampl ◽  
Jeffrey S. Anderson ◽  
Deda C. Gillespie ◽  
David Ferster
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Receptive Field ◽  
Orientation Selectivity ◽  
Simple Cells ◽  
Cat Visual Cortex

Ferrier lecture - Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex

1977 ◽  
Vol 198 (1130) ◽  
pp. 1-59 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Receptive Field ◽  
Striate Cortex ◽  
Single Cells ◽  
Ocular Dominance ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Macaque Monkey ◽  
Area 17 ◽  
Orientation Specificity

Of the many possible functions of the macaque monkey primary visual cortex (striate cortex, area 17) two are now fairly well understood. First, the incoming information from the lateral geniculate bodies is rearranged so that most cells in the striate cortex respond to specifically oriented line segments, and, second, information originating from the two eyes converges upon single cells. The rearrangement and convergence do not take place immediately, however: in layer IVc, where the bulk of the afferents terminate, virtually all cells have fields with circular symmetry and are strictly monocular, driven from the left eye or from the right, but not both; at subsequent stages, in layers above and below IVc, most cells show orientation specificity, and about half are binocular. In a binocular cell the receptive fields in the two eyes are on corresponding regions in the two retinas and are identical in structure, but one eye is usually more effective than the other in influencing the cell; all shades of ocular dominance are seen. These two functions are strongly reflected in the architecture of the cortex, in that cells with common physiological properties are grouped together in vertically organized systems of columns. In an ocular dominance column all cells respond preferentially to the same eye. By four independent anatomical methods it has been shown that these columns have the form of vertically disposed alternating left-eye and right-eye slabs, which in horizontal section form alternating stripes about 400 μm thick, with occasional bifurcations and blind endings. Cells of like orientation specificity are known from physiological recordings to be similarly grouped in much narrower vertical sheeet-like aggregations, stacked in orderly sequences so that on traversing the cortex tangentially one normally encounters a succession of small shifts in orientation, clockwise or counterclockwise; a 1 mm traverse is usually accompanied by one or several full rotations through 180°, broken at times by reversals in direction of rotation and occasionally by large abrupt shifts. A full complement of columns, of either type, left-plus-right eye or a complete 180° sequence, is termed a hypercolumn. Columns (and hence hypercolumns) have roughly the same width throughout the binocular part of the cortex. The two independent systems of hypercolumns are engrafted upon the well known topographic representation of the visual field. The receptive fields mapped in a vertical penetration through cortex show a scatter in position roughly equal to the average size of the fields themselves, and the area thus covered, the aggregate receptive field, increases with distance from the fovea. A parallel increase is seen in reciprocal magnification (the number of degrees of visual field corresponding to 1 mm of cortex). Over most or all of the striate cortex a movement of 1-2 mm, traversing several hypercolumns, is accompanied by a movement through the visual field about equal in size to the local aggregate receptive field. Thus any 1-2 mm block of cortex contains roughly the machinery needed to subserve an aggregate receptive field. In the cortex the fall-off in detail with which the visual field is analysed, as one moves out from the foveal area, is accompanied not by a reduction in thickness of layers, as is found in the retina, but by a reduction in the area of cortex (and hence the number of columnar units) devoted to a given amount of visual field: unlike the retina, the striate cortex is virtually uniform morphologically but varies in magnification. In most respects the above description fits the newborn monkey just as well as the adult, suggesting that area 17 is largely genetically programmed. The ocular dominance columns, however, are not fully developed at birth, since the geniculate terminals belonging to one eye occupy layer IVc throughout its length, segregating out into separate columns only after about the first 6 weeks, whether or not the animal has visual experience. If one eye is sutured closed during this early period the columns belonging to that eye become shrunken and their companions correspondingly expanded. This would seem to be at least in part the result of interference with normal maturation, though sprouting and retraction of axon terminals are not excluded.

Precise Alignment of Micromachined Electrode Arrays With V1 Functional Maps

2007 ◽  
Vol 97 (5) ◽  
pp. 3781-3789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Nauhaus ◽  
Dario L. Ringach
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Electrode Array ◽  
Theoretical Models ◽  
Orientation Tuning ◽  
Feedback Signal ◽  
Electrode Arrays ◽  
Tuning Curves ◽  
Alignment Procedure ◽  
Receptive Field Properties ◽  
Orientation Maps

Recent theoretical models of primary visual cortex predict a relationship between receptive field properties and the location of the neuron within the orientation maps. Testing these predictions requires the development of new methods that allow the recording of single units at various locations across the orientation map. Here we present a novel technique for the precise alignment of functional maps and array recordings. Our strategy consists of first measuring the orientation maps in V1 using intrinsic optical imaging. A micromachined electrode array is subsequently implanted in the same patch of cortex for electrophysiological recordings, including the measurement of orientation tuning curves. The location of the array within the map is obtained by finding the position that maximizes the agreement between the preferred orientations measured electrically and optically. Experimental results of the alignment procedure from two implementations in monkey V1 are presented. The estimated accuracy of the procedure is evaluated using computer simulations. The methodology should prove useful in studying how signals from the local neighborhood of a neuron, thought to provide a dominant feedback signal, shape the receptive field properties in V1.

Effects of Feedback Projections From Area 18 Layers 2/3 to Area 17 Layers 2/3 in the Cat Visual Cortex

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 2667-2675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susana Martinez-Conde ◽  
Javier Cudeiro ◽  
Kenneth L. Grieve ◽  
Rosa Rodriguez ◽  
Casto Rivadulla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Small Region ◽  
Orientation Tuning ◽  
Area 17 ◽  
Visual Responses ◽  
Area 18 ◽  
Cat Visual Cortex ◽  
Effects Of Feedback ◽  
Feedback Connections

In the absence of a direct geniculate input, area 17 cells in the cat are nevertheless able to respond to visual stimuli because of feedback connections from area 18. Anatomic studies have shown that, in the cat visual cortex, layer 5 of area 18 projects to layer 5 of area 17, and layers 2/3 of area 18 project to layers 2/3 of area 17. What is the specific role of these connections? Previous studies have examined the effect of area 18 layer 5 blockade on cells in area 17 layer 5. Here we examine whether the feedback connections from layers 2/3 of area 18 influence the orientation tuning and velocity tuning of cells in layers 2/3 of area 17. Experiments were carried out in anesthetized and paralyzed cats. We blocked reversibly a small region (300 μm radius) in layers 2/3 of area 18 by iontophoretic application of GABA and recorded simultaneously from cells in layers 2/3 of area 17 while stimulating with oriented sweeping bars. Area 17 cells showed either enhanced or suppressed visual responses to sweeping bars of various orientations and velocities during area 18 blockade. For most area 17 cells, orientation bandwidths remained unaltered, and we never observed visual responses during blockade that were absent completely in the preblockade condition. This suggests that area 18 layers 2/3 modulate visual responses in area 17 layers 2/3 without fundamentally altering their specificity.

Processing of form and motion in area 21a of cat visual cortex

1993 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Dreher ◽  
A. Michalski ◽  
R. H. T. Ho ◽  
C. W. F. Lee ◽  
W. Burke
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Organization ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Orientation Tuning ◽  
Area 17 ◽  
Horizontal Strip ◽  
Tuning Curves ◽  
Mean Width ◽  
Area 21A ◽  
The Mean

AbstractExtracellular recordings from single neurons have been made from presumed area 21a of the cerebral cortex of the cat, anesthetized with N2O/O2/sodium pentobarbitone mixture. Area 21a contains mainly a representation of a central horizontal strip of contralateral visual field about 5 deg above and below the horizontal meridian.Excitatory discharge fields of area 21a neurons were substantially (or slightly but significantly) larger than those of neurons at corresponding eccentricities in areas 17, 19, or 18, respectively. About 95% of area 21a neurons could be activated through either eye and the input from the ipsilateral eye was commonly dominant. Over 90% and less than 10% of neurons had, respectively, C-type and S-type receptive-field organization. Virtually all neurons were orientation-selective and the mean width at half-height of the orientation tuning curves at 52.9 deg was not significantly different from that of neurons in areas 17 and 18. About 30% of area 21a neurons had preferred orientations within 15 deg of the vertical.The mean direction-selectivity index (32.8%) of area 21a neurons was substantially lower than the indices for neurons in areas 17 or 18. Only a few neurons exhibited moderately strong end-zone inhibition. Area 21a neurons responded poorly to fast-moving stimuli and the mean preferred velocity at about 12.5 deg/s was not significantly different from that for area 17 neurons.Selective pressure block of Y fibers in contralateral optic nerve resulted in a small but significant reduction in the preferred velocities of neurons activated via the Y-blocked eye. By contrast, removal of the Y input did not produce significant changes in the spatial organization of receptive fields (S or C type), the size of the discharge fields, the width of orientation tuning curves, or direction-selectivity indices.Our results are consistent with the idea that area 21a receives its principal excitatory input from area 17 and is involved mainly in form rather than motion analysis.

Heterogeneity in local distributions of orientation-selective neurons in the cat primary visual cortex

1996 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 509-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro E. Maldonado ◽  
Charles M. Gray
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Primary Visual Cortex ◽  
Local Level ◽  
Spike Trains ◽  
Preferred Orientation ◽  
Orientation Tuning ◽  
Area 17 ◽  
Average Difference ◽  
Orientation Preference ◽  
Neuronal Spike Trains

AbstractWe have employed the tetrode technique, which allows accurate discrimination of individual neuronal spike trains from multiunit recordings, in order to examine the variation of orientation selectivity among local groups of neurons. We recorded a total of 321 cells from 62 sites in area 17 of halothane-anesthetized cats; each site contained between three to ten neurons that were estimated to be less than 65 μm away from the tetrode tip. For each cell, we determined the orientation tuning in response to moving bars. Of the cells tested, 8.4% were unresponsive, 22.7% had no preferential response to any particular orientation, while 68.8% were tuned. The average difference in preferred orientation between cell pairs recorded at the same site was 10.7 deg, but the variance in preferred orientation differences differed significantly among sites. Some clusters of cells exhibited the same or nearly the same orientation preference, while others had orientation preferences that differed by as much as 90 deg. Our data demonstrate that the tuning for orientation is more heterogeneously distributed at a local level than previous studies have suggested.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document