Unique functional properties of the APB sensitive and insensitive rod pathways signaling light decrements in mouse retinal ganglion cells

2006 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
GUO-YONG WANG
Keyword(s):  
Functional Properties ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Clear Cut ◽  
Types Of Information ◽  
Rod Bipolar Cells ◽  
Rod Pathway ◽  
Cone Bipolar Cells

Light decrements are mediated by two distinct groups of rod pathways in the dark-adapted retina that can be differentiated on the basis of their sensitivity to the glutamate agonist DL-2-amino-phosphonobutyric (APB). By means of the APB sensitive pathway, rods transmit light decrementsviarod bipolar cells to AII amacrine cells, then to Off cone bipolar cells, which in turn innervate the dendrites of Off ganglion cells. APB hyperpolarizes rod bipolar cells, thus blocking this rod pathway. With APB insensitive pathways, rods either directly synapse onto Off cone bipolar cells, or rods pass light decrement signal to cones by gap junctions. In the present study, whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were made from ganglion cells in the dark-adapted mouse retina to investigate the functional properties of APB sensitive and insensitive rod pathways. The results revealed several clear-cut differences between the APB sensitive and APB insensitive rod pathways. The latency of Off responses to a flashing spot of light was significantly shorter for the APB insensitive pathways than those for the APB sensitive pathway. Moreover, Off responses of the APB insensitive pathways were found to be capable of following substantially higher stimulus frequencies. Nitric oxide was found to selectively block Off responses in the APB sensitive rod pathway. Collectively, these results provide evidence that the APB sensitive and insensitive rod pathways can convey different types of information signaling light decrements in the dark-adapted retina.

scholarly journals Dark-adapted response threshold of OFF ganglion cells is not set by OFF bipolar cells in the mouse retina

2012 ◽  
Vol 107 (10) ◽  
pp. 2649-2659 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Cyrus Arman ◽  
Alapakkam P. Sampath
Keyword(s):  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Response Threshold ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Signal Flow ◽  
Visual Threshold ◽  
Aii Amacrine Cells ◽  
Aii Amacrine ◽  
Cone Bipolar Cells

The nervous system frequently integrates parallel streams of information to encode a broad range of stimulus strengths. In mammalian retina it is generally believed that signals generated by rod and cone photoreceptors converge onto cone bipolar cells prior to reaching the retinal output, the ganglion cells. Near absolute visual threshold a specialized mammalian retinal circuit, the rod bipolar pathway, pools signals from many rods and converges on depolarizing (AII) amacrine cells. However, whether subsequent signal flow to OFF ganglion cells requires OFF cone bipolar cells near visual threshold remains unclear. Glycinergic synapses between AII amacrine cells and OFF cone bipolar cells are believed to relay subsequently rod-driven signals to OFF ganglion cells. However, AII amacrine cells also make glycinergic synapses directly with OFF ganglion cells. To determine the route for signal flow near visual threshold, we measured the effect of the glycine receptor antagonist strychnine on response threshold in fully dark-adapted retinal cells. As shown previously, we found that response threshold for OFF ganglion cells was elevated by strychnine. Surprisingly, strychnine did not elevate response threshold in any subclass of OFF cone bipolar cell. Instead, in every OFF cone bipolar subclass strychnine suppressed tonic glycinergic inhibition without altering response threshold. Consistent with this lack of influence of strychnine, we found that the dominant input to OFF cone bipolar cells in darkness was excitatory and the response threshold of the excitatory input varied by subclass. Thus, in the dark-adapted mouse retina, the high absolute sensitivity of OFF ganglion cells cannot be explained by signal transmission through OFF cone bipolar cells.

Distribution of protein kinase C isoforms in the cat retina

2002 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 549-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
BOZENA FYK-KOLODZIEJ ◽  
WENHUI CAI ◽  
ROBERTA G. POURCHO
Keyword(s):  
Protein Kinase C ◽  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
Kinase C ◽  
Cat Retina ◽  
Rod Bipolar Cells ◽  
Cone Bipolar Cells

Immunocytochemical localization was carried out for five isoforms of protein kinase C (PKC) in the cat retina. In common with other mammalian species, PKCα was found in rod bipolar cells. Staining was also seen in a small population of cone bipolar cells with axon terminals ramifying near the middle of the inner plexiform layer (IPL). PKCβI was localized to rod bipolar cells, one class of cone bipolar cell, and numerous amacrine and displaced amacrine cells. Staining for PKCβII was seen in three types of cone bipolar cells as well as in amacrine and ganglion cells. Immunoreactivity for both PKCε and PKCζ was found in rod bipolar cells; PKCε was also seen in a population of cone bipolar cells and a few amacrine and ganglion cells whereas PKCζ was found in all ganglion cells. Double-label immunofluorescence studies showed that dendrites of the two PKCβII-positive OFF-cone bipolar cells exhibit immmunoreactivity for the kainate-selective glutamate receptor GluR5. The third PKCβII cone bipolar is an ON-type cell and did not stain for GluR5. The retinal distribution of these isoforms of PKC is consistent with a role in modulation of various aspects of neurotransmission including synaptic vesicle release and regulation of receptor molecules.

Meclofenamic Acid Blocks Electrical Synapses of Retinal AII Amacrine and on-Cone Bipolar Cells

2009 ◽  
Vol 101 (5) ◽  
pp. 2339-2347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Lin Veruki ◽  
Espen Hartveit
Keyword(s):  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Electrical Synapse ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Electrical Synapses ◽  
Meclofenamic Acid ◽  
Aii Amacrine Cells ◽  
Rod Pathway ◽  
Aii Amacrine ◽  
Cone Bipolar Cells

Gap junction channels constitute specialized intercellular contacts that can serve as electrical synapses. In the rod pathway of the retina, electrical synapses between AII amacrine cells express connexin 36 (Cx36) and electrical synapses between AII amacrines and on-cone bipolar cells express Cx36 on the amacrine side and Cx36 or Cx45 on the bipolar side. For physiological investigations of the properties and functions of these electrical synapses, it is highly desirable to have access to potent pharmacological blockers with selective and reversible action. Here we use dual whole cell voltage-clamp recordings of pairs of AII amacrine cells and pairs of AII amacrine and on-cone bipolar cells in rat retinal slices to directly measure the junctional conductance ( Gj) between electrically coupled cells and to study the effect of the drug meclofenamic acid (MFA) on Gj. Consistent with previous tracer coupling studies, we found that MFA reversibly blocked the electrical synapse currents in a concentration-dependent manner, with complete block at 100 μM. Whereas MFA evoked a detectable decrease in Gj within minutes of application, the time to complete block of Gj was considerably longer, typically 20–40 min. After washout, Gj recovered to 20–90% of the control level, but the time to maximum recovery was typically >1 h. These results suggest that MFA can be a useful drug to investigate the physiological functions of electrical synapses in the rod pathway, but that the slow kinetics of block and reversal might compromise interpretation of the results and that explicit monitoring of Gj is desirable.

scholarly journals Center-surround interactions underlie bipolar cell motion sensing in the mouse retina

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Strauss ◽  
Maria M Korympidou ◽  
Yanli Ran ◽  
Katrin Franke ◽  
Timm Schubert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bipolar Cell ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Motion Processing ◽  
Local Motion ◽  
Motion Sensing ◽  
Motion Sensitivity

Motion is a critical aspect of vision. We studied the representation of motion in mouse retinal bipolar cells and found, surprisingly, that some bipolar cells possess motion-sensing capabilities that rely on their center-surround receptive fields. Using a glutamate sensor, we directly observed motion-sensitive bipolar cell synaptic output, which was strongest for local motion and dependent on the motion's origin. We characterized bipolar cell receptive fields and found that there are motion and non-motion sensitive bipolar cell types, the majority being motion sensitive. Next, we used these bipolar cell receptive fields along with connectomics to design biophysical models of downstream cells. The models and experiments demonstrated that bipolar cells pass motion-sensitive excitation to starburst amacrine cells through direction-specific signals mediated by bipolar cells' center-surround receptive field structure. As bipolar cells provide excitation to most amacrine and ganglion cells, their motion sensitivity may contribute to motion processing throughout the visual system.

Light-Evoked Responses of Bipolar Cells in a Mammalian Retina

2000 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 1817-1829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Euler ◽  
Richard H. Masland
Keyword(s):  
Gaba Receptor ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Chloride Current ◽  
Evoked Responses ◽  
Temporal Properties ◽  
Cation Current ◽  
Rod Bipolar Cells ◽  
Cone Bipolar Cells

We recorded light-evoked responses from rod and cone bipolar cells using patch-clamp techniques in a slice preparation of the rat retina. Rod bipolar cells responded to light with a sustained depolarization (on response) followed at light offset by a slight hyperpolarization. on and off cone bipolar cells were encountered, both with diverse temporal properties. The responses of rod bipolar cells were composed primarily of two components, a nonspecific cation current and a chloride current. The chloride current was reduced greatly in axotomized cells and could be suppressed by coapplication of the GABAA antagonist bicuculline and the GABAC antagonist (1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyridine-4-yl)methylphosphinic acid. This suggests that it largely reflects feedback from GABAergic amacrine cells. The response latency of intact rod bipolar cells was shorter than that of the axotomized cells, and the sensitivity curve covered more than twice the dynamic range. Application of the GABA receptor antagonists partially mimicked the effects of axotomy. These findings suggest that functional properties of the axon terminal system—notably synaptic feedback from amacrine cells—play an important role in defining the response properties of mammalian bipolar cells.

scholarly journals Receptive field properties of bipolar cell axon terminals in direction-selective sublaminas of the mouse retina

2014 ◽  
Vol 112 (8) ◽  
pp. 1950-1962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minggang Chen ◽  
Seunghoon Lee ◽  
Silvia J. H. Park ◽  
Loren L. Looger ◽  
Z. Jimmy Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Visual Signals ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Patch Clamp Recording ◽  
Axon Terminals ◽  
Starburst Amacrine Cells

Retinal bipolar cells (BCs) transmit visual signals in parallel channels from the outer to the inner retina, where they provide glutamatergic inputs to specific networks of amacrine and ganglion cells. Intricate network computation at BC axon terminals has been proposed as a mechanism for complex network computation, such as direction selectivity, but direct knowledge of the receptive field property and the synaptic connectivity of the axon terminals of various BC types is required in order to understand the role of axonal computation by BCs. The present study tested the essential assumptions of the presynaptic model of direction selectivity at axon terminals of three functionally distinct BC types that ramify in the direction-selective strata of the mouse retina. Results from two-photon Ca2+ imaging, optogenetic stimulation, and dual patch-clamp recording demonstrated that 1) CB5 cells do not receive fast GABAergic synaptic feedback from starburst amacrine cells (SACs); 2) light-evoked and spontaneous Ca2+ responses are well coordinated among various local regions of CB5 axon terminals; 3) CB5 axon terminals are not directionally selective; 4) CB5 cells consist of two novel functional subtypes with distinct receptive field structures; 5) CB7 cells provide direct excitatory synaptic inputs to, but receive no direct GABAergic synaptic feedback from, SACs; and 6) CB7 axon terminals are not directionally selective, either. These findings help to simplify models of direction selectivity by ruling out complex computation at BC terminals. They also show that CB5 comprises two functional subclasses of BCs.

scholarly journals Cross-synaptic synchrony and transmission of signal and noise across the mouse retina

eLife ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
William N Grimes ◽  
Mrinalini Hoon ◽  
Kevin L Briggman ◽  
Rachel O Wong ◽  
Fred Rieke
Keyword(s):  
Single Neuron ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Light Level ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Anatomical Connectivity ◽  
Physiological Conditions ◽  
Synaptic Noise ◽  
Mammalian Retina ◽  
Rod Bipolar Cells

Cross-synaptic synchrony—correlations in transmitter release across output synapses of a single neuron—is a key determinant of how signal and noise traverse neural circuits. The anatomical connectivity between rod bipolar and A17 amacrine cells in the mammalian retina, specifically that neighboring A17s often receive input from many of the same rod bipolar cells, provides a rare technical opportunity to measure cross-synaptic synchrony under physiological conditions. This approach reveals that synchronization of rod bipolar cell synapses is near perfect in the dark and decreases with increasing light level. Strong synaptic synchronization in the dark minimizes intrinsic synaptic noise and allows rod bipolar cells to faithfully transmit upstream signal and noise to downstream neurons. Desynchronization in steady light lowers the sensitivity of the rod bipolar output to upstream voltage fluctuations. This work reveals how cross-synaptic synchrony shapes retinal responses to physiological light inputs and, more generally, signaling in complex neural networks.

scholarly journals Evidence for novel transient clusters of cholinergic ganglion cells in the neonatal mouse retina

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean de Montigny ◽  
Vidhyasankar Krishnamoorthy ◽  
Fernando Rozenblit ◽  
Tim Gollisch ◽  
Evelyne Sernagor
Keyword(s):  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Neonatal Mouse ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Electrical Imaging ◽  
Subplate Neurons ◽  
Starburst Amacrine Cells ◽  
Cholinergic Cell

AbstractWaves of spontaneous activity sweep across the neonatal mouse retinal ganglion cell (RGC) layer, driven by directly interconnected cholinergic starburst amacrine cells (the only known retinal cholinergic cells) from postnatal day (P) 0-10, followed by waves driven by glutamatergic bipolar cells. We found transient clusters of cholinergic RGC-like cells around the optic disc during the period of cholinergic waves. They migrate towards the periphery between P2-9 and then they disappear. Pan-retinal multielectrode array recordings reveal that cholinergic wave origins follow a similar developmental center-to-periphery pattern. Electrical imaging unmasks hotspots of dipole electrical activity occurring in the vicinity of wave origins. We propose that these activity hotspots are sites for wave initiation and are related to the cholinergic cell clusters, reminiscent of activity in transient subplate neurons in the developing cortex, suggesting a universal hyper-excitability mechanism in developing CNS networks during the critical period for brain wiring.

The effects of serotonin agonists and antagonists on the response properties of complex ganglion cells in the rabbit's retina

1988 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. Brunken ◽  
Nigel W. Daw
Keyword(s):  
Synaptic Transmission ◽  
Spontaneous Activity ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Orientation Selectivity ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Evoked Responses ◽  
Selective Agonists ◽  
Rod Bipolar Cells

AbstractSelective agonists and antagonists were employed to determine the role of indoleaminergic amacrine cells in the generation of the light-evoked responses and spontaneous activity of direction and orientation selective cells. Perfusion with 5-HT2 antagonists reduced the spontaneous activity and both the leading and trailing edge responses of ON/OFF direction selective cells. 5-HT1a agonists had a similar effect on this class of cell, namely, a reduction of light-evoked and spontaneous activity. Results from ON-center and OFF-center orientation selective cells were consistent with those obtained from direction selective cells in that no disruption of direction or orientation selectivity was observed during perfusion of these drugs. These data suggest that the indoleaminergic cells are not directly involved in the generation of the trigger features of complex ganglion cells, but may be facilitating synaptic transmission in the inner retina. This function is discussed relative to the connectivity of the rod bipolar cells and the putative indoleaminergic amacrine cells. The similarity of the effects of 5-HT1a agonists and 5-HT2 antagonists supports the hypothesis, developed during our prior studies of brisk ganglion cells, that these two receptor classes mediate antagonistic processes in the target neurons.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document