Paschalis M. Kitromilides, Neoterē Politikē Theoria II, Ophelimistikos Phileleutherismos Jeremy Bentham—John Stuart Mill, Athens, 1986, pp. 59.

Utilitas ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 166-166
Author(s):  
Bart Schultz

This book has explored some of the doubts and possibilities for different readings of the classical utilitarians, both positive and negative. It has shown how William Godwin, Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill, Henry Sidgwick, and others were forever engaged in tackling both the reasons—or the pleasures and pains—and the persons together, instead of separating them, in often breathtaking visions of a future of maximally happy beings who had through education and personal growth achieved their utilitarian potential. It has also discussed how utilitarianism had become more entangled in imperialistic politics at precisely the point when it lost its foundational philosophical confidence, when it was forced to confront the incoherence of its own accounts of such fundamental notions as happiness, reason, pleasure, and pain.


Author(s):  
John Kenneth Galbraith

This chapter examines the ideas elaborated specifically in the refinement and defense of the classical tradition in economics. There were points of vulnerability and fault that required a defense of the classical tradition, including the pronounced difference between the wages and resulting living standard of the workers and those of the employers or capitalists, the unequal distribution of power inherent in the system, and the phenomenon referred to as a panic, crisis, depression or recession, with its associated unemployment and general despair. The chapter considers how the classical tradition dealt with inequality and oppressive power, focusing on the initial defense advanced for the low wages of the laborer in comparison with the revenues of the employer and landlord. It also discusses the defense from Utilitarianism, led by Jeremy Bentham, and the views of John Stuart Mill, Herbert Spencer, Nassau Senior, and William Stanley Jevons.


1991 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Broome

“Utility,” in plain English, means usefulness. In Australia, a ute is a useful vehicle. Jeremy Bentham specialized the meaning to a particular sort of usefulness. “By utility,” he said, “is meant that property in any object, whereby it tends to produce benefit, advantage, pleasure, good, or happiness (all this in the present case comes to the same thing) or (what comes again to the same thing) to prevent the happening of mischief, pain, evil, or unhappiness to the party whose interest is considered” (1823, p. 2). The “principle of utility” is the principle that actions are to be judged by their usefulness in this sense: their tendency to produce benefit, advantage, pleasure, good, or happiness. When John Stuart Mill (1969, p. 213) spoke of the “perfectly just conception of Utility or Happiness, considered as the directive rule of human conduct,” he was using “Utility” as a short name for this principle. “The greatest happiness principle” was another name for it. People who subscribed to this principle came to be known as utilitarians.


Utilitas ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. D. E. Lewis

The path of those who would approach the study of Bentham's writings on Evidence has been considerably smoothed by the recent publication of William Twining's work on the evidence theories of Bentham and Wigmore. The material on evidence is now being tackled by the Bentham Project. It presents no easy task. The central core, The Rationale of Judicial Evidence, edited and published by John Stuart Mill in 1827, exists only in the printed version, the MSS from which Mill worked having disappeared. But a substantial body of related material which survives has yet to be thoroughly investigated, though William Twining has made a gallant start. A new edition of the work hitherto known as ‘An Introductory View of the Rationale of Evidence’, first printed in full in the Bowring edition of the Works of Jeremy Bentham is in preparation. The first fruits of this endeavour is that the title of that work as it should appear in due course in the new Collected Works will be Introduction to the Rationale of Evidence: An Introductory View for the Use of Lawyers as well as Non-lawyers, the title in fact given to the work by Bentham. It is intended that what follows should similarly be of use to non-lawyers as well as lawyers.


ORDO ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (70) ◽  
pp. 372-385
Author(s):  
Roland Vaubel

ZusammenfassungBei der Rechtfertigung der Freiheit geht es um die Optimierung des Wissens und der Anreize. Freiheit dient der optimalen Nutzung des vorhandenen Wissens und der optimalen Produktion neuen Wissens, und sie gibt dem handelnden Individuum die bestmöglichen Anreize. Der Verfasser analysiert die Geschichte dieser Rechtfertigungen. Informationsökonomische Begründungen verdanken wir Adam Smith, Jeremy Bentham, Wilhelm von Humboldt, John Stuart Mill, Friedrich von Hayek und Karl Popper. Anreiztheoretische Begründungen finden sich bei Thomas von Aquin, Adam Smith und James Mill. Der Verfasser wendet sich gegen den Versuch, die Freiheit oder das Recht auf Eigentum evolutionstheoretisch mit der natürlichen Auslese zu rechtfertigen. Schließlich geht er der Frage nach, inwieweit das klassische Freiheitsziel mit anderen Zielen – dem Effizienzziel, der staatlichen Durchsetzung von Verträgen, der individuellen Wahlfreiheit, der politischen Partizipation und dem sozialistischen Freiheitsbegriff – vereinbar ist.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document