Mirror, mirror in my hand: a duality between specifications and models of process behaviour

1996 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 353-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. L. Fiadeiro ◽  
J. F. Costa
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Structural Property ◽  
Reactive Systems ◽  
Expressive Power ◽  
Seminal Paper ◽  
Process Specification ◽  
Temporal Specifications ◽  
Mirror Mirror

SummarySince Pnueli’s seminal paper in 1977, Temporal Logic has been used as a formalism for specifying and verifying the correctness of reactive systems. In this paper, we show that, besides its expressive power, Temporal Logic enjoys a very strong structural property: it is categorical on processes. That is, we show how temporal specifications (as theories) can be embedded in categories of process behaviour, and out of this adjunction we build an institution that is categorical in the sense of Meseguer. This characterisation means that temporal logic is, in a sense, ‘sound and complete’ with respect to process specification and interconnection techniques.

scholarly journals On the Satisfiability and Model Checking for one Parameterized Extension of Linear-time Temporal Logic

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 356-371
Author(s):  
Anton Romanovich Gnatenko ◽  
Vladimir Anatolyevich Zakharov
Keyword(s):  
Model Checking ◽  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Linear Time ◽  
Complete Solution ◽  
Reactive Systems ◽  
Expressive Power ◽  
Regular Languages ◽  
Specification Languages ◽  
Temporal Logics ◽  
Emptiness Problem

Sequential reactive systems are computer programs or hardware devices which process the flows of input data or control signals and output the streams of instructions or responses. When designing such systems one needs formal specification languages capable of expressing the relationships between the input and output flows. Previously, we introduced a family of such specification languages based on temporal logics $LTL$, $CTL$ and $CTL^*$ combined with regular languages. A characteristic feature of these new extensions of conventional temporal logics is that temporal operators and basic predicates are parameterized by regular languages. In our early papers, we estimated the expressive power of the new temporal logic $Reg$-$LTL$ and introduced a model checking algorithm for $Reg$-$LTL$, $Reg$-$CTL$, and $Reg$-$CTL^*$. The main issue which still remains unclear is the complexity of decision problems for these logics. In the paper, we give a complete solution to satisfiability checking and model checking problems for $Reg$-$LTL$ and prove that both problems are Pspace-complete. The computational hardness of the problems under consideration is easily proved by reducing to them the intersection emptyness problem for the families of regular languages. The main result of the paper is an algorithm for reducing the satisfiability of checking $Reg$-$LTL$ formulas to the emptiness problem for Buchi automata of relatively small size and a description of a technique that allows one to check the emptiness of the obtained automata within space polynomial of the size of input formulas.

scholarly journals On the Expressive Power of Some Extensions of Linear Temporal Logic

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 506-524
Author(s):  
Anton Gnatenko ◽  
Vladimir Zakharov
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Reactive Systems ◽  
Expressive Power ◽  
Linear Temporal Logic ◽  
Reactive System ◽  
Formal Specifications ◽  
Control Signals ◽  
Finite State ◽  
Finite State Transducer ◽  
Output Alphabet

One of the most simple models of computation which is suitable for representation of reactive systems behaviour is a finite state transducer which operates over an input alphabet of control signals and an output alphabet of basic actions. The behaviour of such a reactive system displays itself in the correspondence between flows of control signals and compositions of basic actions performed by the system. We believe that the behaviour of this kind requires more suitable and expressive means for formal specifications than the conventionalLT L. In this paper, we define some new (as far as we know) extensionLP-LT Lof Linear Temporal Logic specifically intended for describing the properties of transducers computations. In this extension the temporal operators are parameterized by sets of words (languages) which represent distinguished flows of control signals that impact on a reactive system. Basic predicates in our variant of the temporal logic are also languages in the alphabet of basic actions of a transducer; they represent the expected response of the transducer to the specified environmental influences. In our earlier papers, we considered a model checking problem forLP-LT LandLP-CT Land showed that this problem has effective solutions. The aim of this paper is to estimate the expressive power ofLP-LT Lby comparing it with some well known logics widely used in the computer science for specification of reactive systems behaviour. We discovered that a restricted variant LP-1-LT Lof our logic is more expressive thanLTLand another restricted variantLP-n-LT Lhas the same expressive power as monadic second order logic S1S.

scholarly journals A One-Pass Tree-Shaped Tableau for LTL+Past

10.29007/3hb9 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Gigante ◽  
Angelo Montanari ◽  
Mark Reynolds
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Computer Science ◽  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Expressive Power ◽  
Temporal Constraints ◽  
Temporal Logics ◽  
The Past ◽  
Tableau System ◽  
Standard Formalism ◽  
Temporal Specifications

Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) is a de-facto standard formalism for expressing properties of systems and temporal constraints in formal verification, artificial intelligence, and other areas of computer science. The problem of LTL satisfiability is thus prominently important to check the consistency of these temporal specifications. Although adding past operators to LTL does not increase its expressive power, recently the interest for explicitly handling the past in temporal logics has increased because of the clarity and succinctness that those operators provide. In this work, a recently proposed one-pass tree-shaped tableau system for LTL is extended to support past operators. The modularity of the required changes provides evidence for the claimed ease of extensibility of this tableau system.

scholarly journals On the Model Checking Problem for Some Extension of CTL*

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 428-441
Author(s):  
Anton Romanovich Gnatenko ◽  
Vladimir Anatolyevich Zakharov
Keyword(s):  
Model Checking ◽  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Reactive Systems ◽  
Expressive Power ◽  
Binary Relations ◽  
Temporal Logics ◽  
Distinctive Features ◽  
Verification Problem ◽  
Finite State ◽  
Infinite Sequences

Sequential reactive systems include programs and devices that work with two streams of data and convert input streams of data into output streams. Such information processing systems include controllers, device drivers, computer interpreters. The result of the operation of such computing systems are infinite sequences of pairs of events of the request-response type, and, therefore, finite transducers are most often used as formal models for them. The behavior of transducers is represented by binary relations on infinite sequences, and so, traditional applied temporal logics (like HML, LTL, CTL, mu-calculus) are poorly suited as specification languages, since omega-languages, not binary relations on omega-words are used for interpretation of their formulae. To provide temporal logics with the ability to define properties of transformations that characterize the behavior ofreactive systems, we introduced new extensions ofthese logics, which have two distinctive features: 1) temporal operators are parameterized, and languages in the input alphabet oftransducers are used as parameters; 2) languages in the output alphabet oftransducers are used as basic predicates. Previously, we studied the expressive power ofnew extensions Reg-LTL and Reg-CTL ofthe well-known temporal logics oflinear and branching time LTL and CTL, in which it was allowed to use only regular languages for parameterization of temporal operators and basic predicates. We discovered that such a parameterization increases the expressive capabilities oftemporal logic, but preserves the decidability of the model checking problem. For the logics mentioned above, we have developed algorithms for the verification of finite transducers. At the next stage of our research on the new extensions of temporal logic designed for the specification and verification of sequential reactive systems, we studied the verification problem for these systems using the temporal logic Reg-CTL*, which is an extension ofthe Generalized Computational Tree Logics CTL*. In this paper we present an algorithm for checking the satisfiability of Reg-CTL* formulae on models of finite state transducers and show that this problem belongs to the complexity class ExpSpace.

scholarly journals On Computational Tractability for Rational Verification

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian Gutierrez ◽  
Muhammad Najib ◽  
Giuseppe Perelli ◽  
Michael Wooldridge
Keyword(s):  
Model Checking ◽  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Multiagent Systems ◽  
Polynomial Time ◽  
Multiagent System ◽  
Reactive Systems ◽  
State System ◽  
Polynomial Space ◽  
Game Theoretic ◽  
Mean Payoff

Rational verification involves checking which temporal logic properties hold of a concurrent and multiagent system, under the assumption that agents in the system choose strategies in game theoretic equilibrium. Rational verification can be understood as a counterpart of model checking for multiagent systems, but while model checking can be done in polynomial time for some temporal logic specification languages such as CTL, and polynomial space with LTL specifications, rational verification is much more intractable: it is 2EXPTIME-complete with LTL specifications, even when using explicit-state system representations.  In this paper we show that the complexity of rational verification can be greatly reduced by restricting specifications to GR(1), a fragment of LTL that can represent most response properties of reactive systems. We also provide improved complexity results for rational verification when considering players' goals given by mean-payoff utility functions -- arguably the most widely used quantitative objective for agents in concurrent and multiagent systems. In particular, we show that for a number of relevant settings, rational verification can be done in polynomial space or even in polynomial time.

scholarly journals Temporalising Separation Logic for Planning with Search Control Knowledge

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xu Lu ◽  
Cong Tian ◽  
Zhenhua Duan
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Expressive Power ◽  
Separation Logic ◽  
Temporal Constraints ◽  
Ai Planning ◽  
Temporal Logics ◽  
Spatial Constraints ◽  
Spatio Temporal ◽  
Control Knowledge ◽  
Search Control

Temporal logics are widely adopted in Artificial Intelligence (AI) planning for specifying Search Control Knowledge (SCK). However, traditional temporal logics are limited in expressive power since they are unable to express spatial constraints which are as important as temporal ones in many planning domains. To this end, we propose a two-dimensional (spatial and temporal) logic namely PPTL^SL by temporalising separation logic with Propositional Projection Temporal Logic (PPTL). The new logic is well-suited for specifying SCK containing both spatial and temporal constraints which are useful in AI planning. We show that PPTL^SL is decidable and present a decision procedure. With this basis, a planner namely S-TSolver for computing plans based on the spatio-temporal SCK expressed in PPTL^SL formulas is developed. Evaluation on some selected benchmark domains shows the effectiveness of S-TSolver.

Temporal logic for process specification and recognition

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arne Kreutzmann ◽  
Immo Colonius ◽  
Diedrich Wolter ◽  
Frank Dylla ◽  
Lutz Frommberger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Process Specification
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document