scholarly journals On the expressive power of temporal logic for infinite words

1991 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 301-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joëlle Cohen-Chesnot
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Expressive Power ◽  
Infinite Words

FINITE STATE PROCESSES, Z-TEMPORAL LOGIC AND THE MONADIC THEORY OF THE INTEGERS

1992 ◽  
Vol 03 (03) ◽  
pp. 233-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. SAOUDI ◽  
D.E. MULLER ◽  
P.E. SCHUPP
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Linear Temporal Logic ◽  
Second Order ◽  
Regular Languages ◽  
Infinite Words ◽  
First Order ◽  
Monadic Theory ◽  
Finite State ◽  
Temporal Formula

We introduce four classes of Z-regular grammars for generating bi-infinite words (i.e. Z-words) and prove that they generate exactly Z-regular languages. We extend the second order monadic theory of one successor to the set of the integers (i.e. Z) and give some characterizations of this theory in terms of Z-regular grammars and Z-regular languages. We prove that this theory is decidable and equivalent to the weak theory. We also extend the linear temporal logic to Z-temporal logic and then prove that each Z-temporal formula is equivalent to a first order monadic formula. We prove that the correctness problem for finite state processes is decidable.

Mirror, mirror in my hand: a duality between specifications and models of process behaviour

1996 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 353-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. L. Fiadeiro ◽  
J. F. Costa
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Structural Property ◽  
Reactive Systems ◽  
Expressive Power ◽  
Seminal Paper ◽  
Process Specification ◽  
Temporal Specifications ◽  
Mirror Mirror

SummarySince Pnueli’s seminal paper in 1977, Temporal Logic has been used as a formalism for specifying and verifying the correctness of reactive systems. In this paper, we show that, besides its expressive power, Temporal Logic enjoys a very strong structural property: it is categorical on processes. That is, we show how temporal specifications (as theories) can be embedded in categories of process behaviour, and out of this adjunction we build an institution that is categorical in the sense of Meseguer. This characterisation means that temporal logic is, in a sense, ‘sound and complete’ with respect to process specification and interconnection techniques.

scholarly journals Temporalising Separation Logic for Planning with Search Control Knowledge

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xu Lu ◽  
Cong Tian ◽  
Zhenhua Duan
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Expressive Power ◽  
Separation Logic ◽  
Temporal Constraints ◽  
Ai Planning ◽  
Temporal Logics ◽  
Spatial Constraints ◽  
Spatio Temporal ◽  
Control Knowledge ◽  
Search Control

Temporal logics are widely adopted in Artificial Intelligence (AI) planning for specifying Search Control Knowledge (SCK). However, traditional temporal logics are limited in expressive power since they are unable to express spatial constraints which are as important as temporal ones in many planning domains. To this end, we propose a two-dimensional (spatial and temporal) logic namely PPTL^SL by temporalising separation logic with Propositional Projection Temporal Logic (PPTL). The new logic is well-suited for specifying SCK containing both spatial and temporal constraints which are useful in AI planning. We show that PPTL^SL is decidable and present a decision procedure. With this basis, a planner namely S-TSolver for computing plans based on the spatio-temporal SCK expressed in PPTL^SL formulas is developed. Evaluation on some selected benchmark domains shows the effectiveness of S-TSolver.

scholarly journals On the Satisfiability and Model Checking for one Parameterized Extension of Linear-time Temporal Logic

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 356-371
Author(s):  
Anton Romanovich Gnatenko ◽  
Vladimir Anatolyevich Zakharov
Keyword(s):  
Model Checking ◽  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Linear Time ◽  
Complete Solution ◽  
Reactive Systems ◽  
Expressive Power ◽  
Regular Languages ◽  
Specification Languages ◽  
Temporal Logics ◽  
Emptiness Problem

Sequential reactive systems are computer programs or hardware devices which process the flows of input data or control signals and output the streams of instructions or responses. When designing such systems one needs formal specification languages capable of expressing the relationships between the input and output flows. Previously, we introduced a family of such specification languages based on temporal logics $LTL$, $CTL$ and $CTL^*$ combined with regular languages. A characteristic feature of these new extensions of conventional temporal logics is that temporal operators and basic predicates are parameterized by regular languages. In our early papers, we estimated the expressive power of the new temporal logic $Reg$-$LTL$ and introduced a model checking algorithm for $Reg$-$LTL$, $Reg$-$CTL$, and $Reg$-$CTL^*$. The main issue which still remains unclear is the complexity of decision problems for these logics. In the paper, we give a complete solution to satisfiability checking and model checking problems for $Reg$-$LTL$ and prove that both problems are Pspace-complete. The computational hardness of the problems under consideration is easily proved by reducing to them the intersection emptyness problem for the families of regular languages. The main result of the paper is an algorithm for reducing the satisfiability of checking $Reg$-$LTL$ formulas to the emptiness problem for Buchi automata of relatively small size and a description of a technique that allows one to check the emptiness of the obtained automata within space polynomial of the size of input formulas.

scholarly journals On the Expressive Power of Some Extensions of Linear Temporal Logic

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 506-524
Author(s):  
Anton Gnatenko ◽  
Vladimir Zakharov
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Reactive Systems ◽  
Expressive Power ◽  
Linear Temporal Logic ◽  
Reactive System ◽  
Formal Specifications ◽  
Control Signals ◽  
Finite State ◽  
Finite State Transducer ◽  
Output Alphabet

One of the most simple models of computation which is suitable for representation of reactive systems behaviour is a finite state transducer which operates over an input alphabet of control signals and an output alphabet of basic actions. The behaviour of such a reactive system displays itself in the correspondence between flows of control signals and compositions of basic actions performed by the system. We believe that the behaviour of this kind requires more suitable and expressive means for formal specifications than the conventionalLT L. In this paper, we define some new (as far as we know) extensionLP-LT Lof Linear Temporal Logic specifically intended for describing the properties of transducers computations. In this extension the temporal operators are parameterized by sets of words (languages) which represent distinguished flows of control signals that impact on a reactive system. Basic predicates in our variant of the temporal logic are also languages in the alphabet of basic actions of a transducer; they represent the expected response of the transducer to the specified environmental influences. In our earlier papers, we considered a model checking problem forLP-LT LandLP-CT Land showed that this problem has effective solutions. The aim of this paper is to estimate the expressive power ofLP-LT Lby comparing it with some well known logics widely used in the computer science for specification of reactive systems behaviour. We discovered that a restricted variant LP-1-LT Lof our logic is more expressive thanLTLand another restricted variantLP-n-LT Lhas the same expressive power as monadic second order logic S1S.

scholarly journals Kripke Incompleteness of First-order Calculi with Temporal Modalities of CTL and Near Logics

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-99
Author(s):  
Е. А. Котикова ◽  
М. Н. Рыбаков
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Expressive Power ◽  
Branching Time ◽  
First Order ◽  
Kripke Frames ◽  
Order Language ◽  
Constant Domains ◽  
Kripke Incompleteness ◽  
Computational Tree Logic

We study an expressive power of temporal operators used in such logics of branching time as computational tree logic or alternating-time temporal logic. To do this we investigate calculi in the first-order language enriched with the temporal operators used in such logics. We show that the resulting languages are so powerful that many ‘natural’ calculi in the languages are not Kripke complete; for example, if a calculus in such language is correct with respect to the class of all serial linear Kripke frames (even just with constant domains) then it is not Kripke complete. Some near questions are discussed.

scholarly journals Extended Temporal Logic on Finite Words and Wreath Product of Monoids with Distinguished Generators

2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (47) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoltán Ésik
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Wreath Product ◽  
Expressive Power ◽  
Regular Languages ◽  
Modal Operator

We associate a modal operator with each language belonging to a given class of regular languages and use the (reverse) wreath product of monoids with distinguished generators to characterize the expressive power of the resulting logic.

scholarly journals Certifying Inexpressibility

2021 ◽  
pp. 385-405
Author(s):  
Orna Kupferman ◽  
Salomon Sickert
Keyword(s):  
Winning Strategy ◽  
Expressive Power ◽  
The State ◽  
Infinite Words ◽  
Current State ◽  
Büchi Automata ◽  
Deterministic Automata ◽  
Buchi Automata

AbstractDifferent classes of automata on infinite words have different expressive power. Deciding whether a given language$$L \subseteq \varSigma ^\omega $$L⊆Σωcan be expressed by an automaton of a desired class can be reduced to deciding a game between Prover and Refuter: in each turn of the game, Refuter provides a letter in$$\varSigma $$Σ, and Prover responds with an annotation of the current state of the run (for example, in the case of Büchi automata, whether the state is accepting or rejecting, and in the case of parity automata, what the color of the state is). Prover wins if the sequence of annotations she generates is correct: it is an accepting run iff the word generated by Refuter is inL. We show how a winning strategy for Refuter can serve as a simple and easy-to-understand certificate to inexpressibility, and how it induces additional forms of certificates. Our framework handles all classes of deterministic automata, including ones with structural restrictions like weak automata. In addition, it can be used for refutingseparationof two languages by an automaton of the desired class, and for finding automata thatapproximateLand belong to the desired class.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document