Abstract
STUDY QUESTION
Is there a possibility of reseeding cancer cells potentially present in frozen ovarian tissue from patients with central nervous system (CNS) tumours?
SUMMARY ANSWER
Malignancy reseeding in cryopreserved ovarian tissue from 20 patients with CNS tumours was not detected by histology, immunohistochemistry (IHC), molecular biology or xenotransplantation.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
Ovarian metastasis potential has been documented in patients with leukaemia, borderline ovarian tumours, advanced breast cancer and Ewing sarcoma. However, data on the safety of transplanting frozen-thawed ovarian tissue from cancer patients with CNS tumours are still lacking.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION
This prospective experimental study was conducted in an academic gynaecology research laboratory using cryopreserved ovarian cortex from 20 patients suffering from CNS tumours. Long-term (5 months) xenografting was performed in immunodeficient mice.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS
Subjects enrolled in the study were suffering from one of six types of CNS tumours including medulloblastoma, ependymoma, primitive neuroectodermal tumours, astrocytoma, glioblastoma and germinoma. The presence of malignant cells was investigated with disease-specific markers for each patient in cryopreserved and xenografted ovarian tissue by histology, IHC via expression of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and reverse transcription droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (RT-ddPCR) for quantification of GFAP and ENO2 gene amplification.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE
Serial sections of cryopreserved and xenografted ovarian tissue from 20 patients showed no malignant cells by histology. All samples were negative for NSE and GFAP, although these neural markers were expressed extensively in the patients’ primary tumours. Analysis by RT-ddPCR revealed no cancer cells detected in cryopreserved and xenografted ovarian fragments from subjects with astrocytoma, ependymoma, glioblastoma or medulloblastoma. Taken together, the study found no evidence of malignancy seeding in frozen-thawed and xenotransplanted ovarian tissue from patients affected by CNS cancers.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION
This analysis cannot guarantee complete elimination of disseminated disease from all cryopreserved ovarian cortex, since we are unable to examine the fragments used for transplantation.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS
This is the first study to be conducted in patients with CNS cancers undergoing ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation, and clearly demonstrates no tumour seeding in their frozen-thawed and xenografted tissue. This information is vital for doctors to provide patients with meaningful and accurate advice on the possibilities and risks of ovarian tissue reimplantation.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)
This study was supported by grants from the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique de Belgique–the Excellence of Science (FNRS–EOS), number 30443682 awarded to M.-M.D. and T.Y.T.N., FNRS grant number 5/4/150/5 and FNRS-PDR Convention grant number T.0077.14 awarded to M.-M.D., grant 2018-042 from the Foundation Against Cancer awarded to A.C., and private donations (Ferrero, de Spoelberch). The authors declare no competing financial interests.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
N/A.
Methods for preserving fertility in young women suffering from cancer: some aspects of ovarian tissue cryopreservation
