The public's view of public health in mid-Victorian Britain

Urban History ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Sigsworth ◽  
Michael Worboys

What did the public think about public health reform in mid-Victorian Britain? Historians have had a lot to say about the sanitary mentality and actions of the middle class, yet have been strangely silent about the ideas and behaviour of the working class, who were the great majority of the public and the group whose health was mainly in question. Perhaps there is nothing to say. The working class were commonly referred to as ‘the Great Unwashed’, purportedly ignorant and indifferent on matters of personal hygiene, environmental sanitation and hence health. Indeed, the writings of reformers imply that the working class simply did not have a sanitary mentality. However, the views of sanitary campaigners should not be taken at face value. Often propaganda and always one class's perception of another, in the context of the social apartheid in Britain's cities in the mid-nineteenth century, sanitary campaigners' views probably reveal more about middle-class anxieties than the actual social and physical conditions of the poor. None the less many historians still use such material to portray working-class life, but few have gone on to ask how public health reform was seen and experienced ‘from below’. Historians of public health have tended to portray the urban working class as passive victims who were rescued by enlightened middle-class reformers. This seems to be borne out at the political level where, unlike with other popular movements of the 1840s and after, there is little evidence of working-class participation in, or support for, the public health movement.

2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 183-189
Author(s):  
Ramunė KALĖDIENĖ ◽  
Audrius ŠČEPONAVIČIUS

Particular emphasis in the development of the public health care system in Lithuania was put on strengthening public health at the municipal level. This paper aims at investigating the possibilities and barriers of the public health reform in Lithuania by analyzing the experience of establishing public health bureaus as the major players in public health development at the municipal level. The Lithuanian National Public Health Strategy and Action Plan have been adopted by the Government in 2006. Ministry of Health prepared legal acts and programmes that encourage local authorities to establish public health bureaus. By the end of 2010, 32 municipal Public health bureaus were set up. The core main functions of the bureaus are public health promotion, monitoring public health and child health care. The first steps of the bureaus were complicated by the lack of well-developed strategies of action and local support, as well as by financial challenges. For strengthening the position of the bureaus in society, benefits of these newly established institutions should be widely presented to the public; sustainable financing mechanisms and a focus on intersectoral cooperation, integrating public health into primary health care are needed; also, human resource development should be foreseen. In spite of the rather challenging beginning, bureaus are starting to provide means by which local governments, in partnership with the service providers, other stakeholders and the community can plan and implement public health services and programmes and play a significant role in improving the health of population. Keywords: Lithuania, public health reform, municipal level, public health bureau


2011 ◽  
pp. 132-141
Author(s):  
O. Chirkunov

Certain solutions in politics and economics seem self-evident, at first glance. It seems one should simply correct an obvious mistake and the world will change for the better. However, when the good deed has been done, the result may be quite far from what was expected. Reforms can only be successful if they take into account the interests and motives of all the participants of the process. Starting from this thesis, the author discusses the stages in the public health reform in Russia and proposes an explanation why many governments actions in this field turn out to be ineffective and fail to reach the intended goal.


2021 ◽  
pp. 237337992098726
Author(s):  
Siobhan Hickling ◽  
Alexandra Bhatti ◽  
Gina Arena ◽  
James Kite ◽  
Justin Denny ◽  
...  

COVID-19 has altered public health higher education and its impact on pedagogy will be felt long into the future. In response to social distancing measures, teaching academics implemented a number of changes to curricula. It is important to better understand and begin to evaluate these changes, as well as set a course for future changes to public health curricula both during and after the pandemic to best enable transformative learning. Teaching academics have an understanding of academic hierarchies and student perceptions and are well placed to provide insights into current and future changes to pedagogy in response to the pandemic. A survey was developed to examine changes that academics had made to their teaching in response to COVID-19. Responses were received from 63 public health teaching academics from five universities in Australia, the United States, and Canada. Public health teaching academics rapidly implemented a number of changes to their teaching, including alterations that enabled online teaching. The great majority of changes to teaching were related to tools or techniques, such as synchronous tutorials delivered in a video meeting room. There remains further work for the public health pedagogy community in reevaluating teaching aims and teaching philosophies in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. This could include examination of the weighting of different topics, including communicable diseases, in curricula. A series of questions to assist academics reformulating their curricula is provided. Public health teaching evolved rapidly to meet the challenges of COVID-19; however, ongoing adaptation is necessary to further enhance pedagogy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document