Intensive family preservation programs: What are they?

1994 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 19-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorothy Scott

This paper outlines the basic characteristics of intensive family preservation programs which have very recently been introduced into the child welfare systems of most Australian States. Typically these programs have been used to prevent placement or to assist families whose children are being returned to their care. Highly intensive and with 24 hour availability these short-term services draw on a range of theoretical approaches and are delivered in the family's home and natural environment. It is argued that Australia should avoid both the ‘cultural cringe’ and the ‘Tall Poppy Syndrome’ in assessing what intensive family preservation services may have to offer us.

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terri S. Thompson ◽  
Kathleen Snyder ◽  
Karin Malm ◽  
Carolyn O'Brien

Author(s):  
Kristin S. Seefeldt ◽  
Jacob Leos-Urbel ◽  
Patricia McMahon ◽  
Kathleen Snyder

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Tout ◽  
Karin Martinson ◽  
Robin Koralek ◽  
Jennifer Ehrle

Author(s):  
Elizabeth S. Cole

The author discusses current challenges to increasing family-centered practice within child welfare agencies. The article focuses on two issues: (1) child welfare's collaboration with early-intervention and family-support services and (2) maintaining family-preservation services despite growing criticism of such services.


2020 ◽  
Vol 692 (1) ◽  
pp. 253-274
Author(s):  
Alan J. Dettlaff ◽  
Reiko Boyd

Children of color are overrepresented in the child welfare system, and Black children have been most significantly impacted by this racial disproportionality. Racial disproportionality in child welfare exists because of influences that are both external to child welfare systems and part of the child welfare system. We summarize the causes of racial disproportionality, arguing that internal and external causes of disproportional involvement originate from a common underlying factor: structural and institutional racism that is both within child welfare systems and part of society at large. Further, we review options for addressing racial disproportionality, arguing that it needs to be rectified because of the harm it causes Black children and families and that forcible separation of children from their parents can no longer be viewed as an acceptable form of intervention for families in need.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document