Change in psychotropic drug use in Norwegian nursing homes between 2004 and 2011

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 385-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Selbæk ◽  
S. I.M. Janus ◽  
S. Bergh ◽  
K. Engedal ◽  
S. Ruths ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTBackground:We aimed to assess whether there were any changes in the use of psychotropic drugs in Norwegian nursing homes between 2004 and 2011. Also, we investigated whether the predictors of use of specific psychotropic drug groups have changed.Methods:We conducted a secondary analysis of two cohort studies of two Norwegian nursing home samples (2004/05 and 2010/11). Multivariate models were applied.Results:We found a significant decrease in the prescription of antipsychotic drugs between 2004 and 2011 (0.63 OR, 95%CI = 0.49–0.82, p < 0.001) even after adjusting for relevant demographic and clinical variables. There are only minor changes for the other psychotropic drugs. We found that (1) the use of specific psychotropic drug groups as well as the number of psychotropic drugs used was associated with more affective symptoms and (2) the use of specific psychotropic drug groups as well as the number of psychotropic drugs used was associated with lower scores on the Physical Self-Maintenance scale.Conclusion:This is the first study to show a robust decrease in antipsychotic drug use in nursing home patients with dementia unrelated to possible changes in case mix. The change might be explained by treatment recommendations against its use except in the most severe conditions of aggression or psychosis. Our findings indicate that it takes several years to implement scientific knowledge in clinical practice in nursing homes.

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 1185-1193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ans J.M.J. Mulders ◽  
Sytse U. Zuidema ◽  
Renée Leeuwis ◽  
Hans Bor ◽  
Frans R.J. Verhey ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. T. C. M. Koopmans ◽  
M. A. J. H. Willekens-Bogaers ◽  
J. M. Rossum ◽  
H. J. M. Hoogen ◽  
C. Weel ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 1589-1595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaas van der Spek ◽  
Debby L. Gerritsen ◽  
Martin Smalbrugge ◽  
Marjorie H. J. M. G. Nelissen-Vrancken ◽  
Roland B. Wetzels ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTBackground:This study explores the appropriateness of psychotropic drug (PD) use for neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in nursing home patients with dementia.Methods:A cross-sectional study on 559 patients with dementia residing on dementia special care units in Dutch nursing homes was conducted. Appropriateness of PD use was assessed using the Appropriate Psychotropic drug use In Dementia (APID) index. The APID index score is calculated using information about individual PDs from patients’ medical records. The index encompasses seven (different) domains of appropriateness, i.e. indication, evaluation, dosage, drug-drug interactions, drug-disease interactions, duplications, and therapy duration.Results:A total of 578 PDs were used for NPS by 60% of the nursing home patients. Indication, evaluation, and therapy duration contributed the most to inappropriate use. Ten per cent of the PDs scored fully appropriate according to the APID index sum score, 36% scored fully appropriate for indication, 46% scored fully appropriate for evaluation, and 58% scored fully appropriate for therapy duration. Antidepressants were used the most appropriately, and antiepileptics the most inappropriately.Conclusions:The minority of the PD use was fully appropriate. The results imply that PD use for NPS in dementia can be improved; the appropriateness should be optimized with a clinical focus on the appropriate indications, evaluations, and therapy duration.


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (S1) ◽  
pp. 27-28

Section A. Psychotropic drug use (20 minutes)1) Sytse Zuidema: The RID (Reduction of inappropriate psychotropic drugs in dementia) study Nursing home residents with dementia and neuropsychiatric symptoms are prescribed psychotropic drugs too often and also sometimes inappropriate. Multidisciplinary interventions can help to facilitate better care by using psychosocial interventions and help to decrease inappropriate psychotropic drug use. We supported implementation of such interventions through participatory action research, to facilitate nursing homes to design, and implement their own local interventions. The results of the RCT (including a process evaluation) will be presented.2) Tzung-Jeng Hwang: dextromethorphan for treating agitationAgitation is highly prevalent in patients with dementia and associated with significant impairment of quality of life, early institutionalization, and higher mortality. Although no pharmacotherapy has been approved by the US FDA for dementia patients with agitation, off-label use of antipsychotic agents is common. But antipsychotic agents are clearly associated with increased adverse effects, including stroke and death. Dextromethorphan (DXM) is a low-affinity uncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, a high-affinity sigma-1 receptor agonist, a serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, and a nicotinicα3β4 receptor antagonist. The combination of DXM and low dose quinidine (Q) has been approved for the treatment of pseudobulbar affect in 2010. A recent study found that DXM/Q may be effective for the management of agitation in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD). In this talk, a pilot study on using DXM alone to treat agitation in dementia will be reported. Overall, the use of DXM 60-240 mg/day resulted in a high proportion of improvement (CGI-agitation: 69% much improved, 25% minimally improved). No severe adverse events were found. The results support DXM may be efficacious and safe.3) Marie Andree Bruneau: OPUS-APOPUS-AP aims at improving resident care through increased staff’s knowledge and competency, resident-centered approaches, nonpharmacologic interventions, and antipsychotic deprescribing in inappropriate indications. OPUS-AP is implemented through integrated knowledge translation and mobilization activities. Antipsychotic, benzodiazepine, antidepressant prescriptions and BPSD were evaluated every 3 months for 9 months. Phase 2 of OPUS-AP was conducted in 129 LTC centres in Quebec, Canada, from April to December 2019. At baseline (April 2019), 10,601 residents were admitted on OPUS-AP participating wards from which 74% had a diagnosis of major neurocognitive disorder (MNCD) and 47% an antipsychotic prescription. The follow-up cohort included 4,087 residents with both MNCD and antipsychotic prescription. Among the 1381 residents in whom antipsychotic deprescribing was attempted between baseline and 9 months and still included at 9 months, successful deprescribing was achieved in 79,2% (cessation 44,8% or dose decrease 34,5%)). No increase in benzodiazepine or antidepressant prescriptions nor worsening of BPSD were observed.Section B. Updates on BPSD (20 minutes)1) Kathrin Schmuedderich: Severe agitation and quality of lifeA secondary data analysis was performed on the relationships between the severity of agitation (NPI-Q) and the single dimensions of quality of life (QUALIDEM) in people with dementia living in German nursing homes. In order to determine the differences between people with severe agitation and the group of people with mild or no agitation, a matching method and regression analyses were used. The findings show that severe agitation is related to lower quality of life in five out of six dimensions of quality of life.2) Wai-chi Chan: BPSD as a predictor of cognitive declineDescription will follow3) Huali Wang: Challenging behavior in ChinaDescription will followSection C. Measurement of BPSD (25 minutes)1) Wendy Moyle: Measurement of agitationThis presentation demonstrates how the use of video observation/coding, standardised measures of agitation (CMAI-SF), and physiological measures (actigraphy) produced different outcome results related to agitated behaviours following the introduction of a social robot. When measuring agitation, we need to consider using different types of measures to ensure data reliability and validity and longitudinal research methods to identify efficacy of psychosocial interventions and effective measurement of agitation when using social robots.2) Discussion on measurement of agitation, discussing and making plans for datasharing based on a template for datastructuresSection D. ECT (15 minutes)1) Rob Kok: short intro on ECT in BPSDThe majority of patients with dementia develop agitation or aggression in the course of their disease. In some severe cases, pharmacological and other interventions are not effective in improving these symptoms. A recent systematic review suggested that electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) could be an effective treatment for severe and treatment-refractory agitation and aggression in dementia, with few adverse consequences. We need to have controlled studies, address the stigma of ECT and develop professional guidelines for the application of ECT for agitation and aggression in dementia, particularly because most patients are not able to provide informed consent.2) Discussion and making plan for international survey on application of ECT in BPSD


2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 1632-1639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sytse U. Zuidema ◽  
Jos F. M. de Jonghe ◽  
Frans R. J. Verhey ◽  
Raymond T. C. M. Koopmans

ABSTRACTBackground: The aim of the study was to examine whether staff distress and aspects of the nursing home environment were associated with psychotropic drug use (PDU) in patients with dementia.Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of 1289 nursing home patients with dementia from 56 Dementia Special Care Units (SCUs) in the Netherlands. The primary outcome was PDU. Potential correlates of PDU were staff distress, environmental correlates (the number of patients per unit or per living room, staff/patient ratio, and the presence of a walking circuit), and patient factors (gender, age, dementia severity, and neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS)). Multilevel logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the relative contributions of predictor variables in explaining PDU.Results: Staff distress, aspects of the physical nursing home environment and patients’ neuropsychiatric symptoms were independently associated with PDU. Staff distress at patients’ agitation was associated with antipsychotic and anxiolytic drug use (OR 1.66, 95% CI (1.16–2.36) and 1.62 (1.00–2.61), respectively). SCUs with more patients per living room had higher hypnotic drug use (OR 1.08, 95% CI (1.02–1.14)). Low staff/patient ratio was associated with high antidepressant drug use (OR 0.13, 95% CI (0.04–0.47)). The effects of nursing home environment on study outcome were smallest for antidepressant use (intra-SCU correlation 0.005) and highest for hypnotic use (intra-SCU correlation 0.171).Conclusion: Staff distress and other environmental aspects are independently associated with PDU. These findings raise questions about the appropriateness of psychoactive drug prescriptions for nursing home patients with dementia.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia M. Groot Kormelinck ◽  
Charlotte F. van Teunenbroek ◽  
Sytse U. Zuidema ◽  
Martin Smalbrugge ◽  
Debby L. Gerritsen

Abstract Background Research suggests that collaborative and tailored approaches with external expertise are important to process implementations. We therefore performed a process evaluation of an intervention using participatory action research, tailored information provision, and external coaching to reduce inappropriate psychotropic drug use among nursing home residents with dementia. The process evaluation was conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial assessing the utility of this approach. Methods We used Leontjevas’ model of process evaluation to guide data collection and analysis, focusing on the relevance and feasibility, extent of performance, and barriers and facilitators to implementation. Data on the relevance and feasibility and on the extent of performance were collected using a questionnaire targeting internal project leaders at nursing homes and our external coaches. Implementation barriers and facilitators were identified by individual semi-structured interviews. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to structure and describe the identified barriers and facilitators. Results The intervention was viewed positively, but it was also considered time consuming due to the involvement of many people and designing a tailored action and implementation plan was viewed as complex. The extent of performance differed between nursing homes. Delays in implementation and suboptimal execution of actions may have reduced effectiveness of the RID intervention in some nursing homes. Barriers to implementation were reorganizations, staff turnover, communication issues, unclear expectations, and perceived time pressures. Implementation also depended on the involvement and skills of key stakeholders, and organizations’ readiness to change. Although external coaches stimulated implementation, their additional value was rated variably across organizations. Conclusions Barriers to implementation occurred on several levels and some barriers appear to be inherent to the nursing home environment and could be points of leverage of future implementation trajectories. This underlines the importance of assessing and supporting organizations in their readiness to change. Sensitivity analyses, taking into account the week in which nursing homes started with implementation and the degree to which actions were implemented as intended, will be appropriate in the effect analyses of the trial.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Branford ◽  
David Gerrard ◽  
Nigget Saleem ◽  
Carl Shaw ◽  
Anne Webster

Purpose The programme – Stopping the over-medication of people with an intellectual disability, Autism or Both (STOMP) is a three-year programme supported by NHS England. Concern about the overuse of antipsychotic drugs has been a constant theme since the 1970s. However, despite a multitude of guidelines the practice continues. The report into the events at Winterbourne View not only raised concerns about the overuse of antipsychotic drugs but of antidepressants and multiple psychotropic drug use. The purpose of this paper is twofold: Part 1 is to present the history and background to the use of psychotropic drugs in intellectual disabilities, autism or both; and Part 2 presents the progress with the STOMP programme. Design/methodology/approach The review tracks the various concerns, guidelines and attempts to tackle the issue of over medication of people with intellectual disability autism or both. Findings The review identifies that despite the many studies and guidelines associated with the prescribing of psychotropic drugs for people with an intellectual disability, autism or both the practice is common. Programmes that minimise the use of psychotropic drugs involve a full use of the multidisciplinary team and an availability of alternative methods of managing challenging behaviours. Originality/value STOMP is part of an English national agenda – Transforming care. The English Government and leading organisations across the health and care system are committed to transforming care for people with intellectual disabilities, autism or both who have a mental illness or whose behaviour challenges services. This review identifies many studies, programmes and guidelines associated with psychotropic drug use for people with an intellectual disability, autism or both.


2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (03) ◽  
pp. 485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renate M. Nijk ◽  
Sytse U. Zuidema ◽  
Raymond T. C. M. Koopmans

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document