Vagus Nerve Stimulation and Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome: A Review of the Literature and Data From the VNS Patient Registry

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 766-770 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Karceski

ABSTRACTLennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is a severe form of childhood epilepsy that is usually refractory to medical management. When medications fail, alternative therapies are considered. Among these are two surgical options: corpus callosotomy and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS). Safety and efficacy are two important factors to consider when selecting an appropriate treatment. VNS is safer than callosotomy, but its efficacy is more difficult to assess. Available studies evaluate its effectiveness using a mixed population of patients (some with prior epilepsy surgery), a multitude of VNS settings, and variable endpoints. To estimate the efficacy of VNS in patients with LGS, a review of the medical literature and the VNS Patient Registry was performed. Within the limits of this type of study, the results showed that VNS appears equally as effective as callosotomy. Because VNS has a lower potential for adverse events, these results suggest that VNS should be considered first in appropriately selected patient.

2002 ◽  
Vol 17 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2S9-2S22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edwin Trevathan

Infantile spasms and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome are rare but are important to child neurologists because of the intractable nature of the seizures and the serious neurologic comorbidities. New antiepileptic drugs offer more alternatives for treating both infantile spasms and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Selected children with infantile spasms are candidates for epilepsy surgery. Vagus nerve stimulation, corpus callosotomy, and the ketogenic diet are all options for selected children with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. The epidemiology, clinical manifestations of the seizures, electroencephalographic characteristics, prognosis, and treatment options are reviewed for infantile spasms and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Additional therapies are needed for both infantile spasms and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome as many children fail to achieve adequate seizure control in spite of newer treatments. (J Child Neurol 2002;17:2S9—2S22).


2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 27-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Nasi ◽  
Maurizio Iacoangeli ◽  
Lucia Di Somma ◽  
Mauro Dobran ◽  
Alessandro Di Rienzo ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 138-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Gerson ◽  
Evan Murray ◽  
Bruce Price ◽  
Mark Frankel ◽  
Laurie M. Douglass ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 71 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 65-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Guillamón ◽  
J. Miró ◽  
A. Gutiérrez ◽  
R. Conde ◽  
M. Falip ◽  
...  

Neurosurgery ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan D. Couch ◽  
Arthur M. Gilman ◽  
Werner K. Doyle

Abstract BACKGROUND: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an established surgical treatment for medically intractable epilepsy with more than 75 000 devices implanted worldwide. While there are many reports documenting efficacy, complications, and clinical use, there are very few reports concerning VNS battery replacement and revision surgeries. OBJECTIVE: To review our experience with VNS battery replacement and revision surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1144 consecutive VNS procedures performed by a single surgeon between 1998 and 2012. Six hundred forty-four of those procedures were the initial placement of the VNS device. These patients were then followed to determine when a battery change occurred and what type of revision or removal was necessary. RESULTS: In the study, 46% of patients required at least 1 or more type of battery replacement or revision surgery. The most common types of surgery were for generator battery depletion (27%), poor efficacy (9%), and lead malfunction (8%). Only 2% of patients were noted to have an infection. CONCLUSION: VNS battery replacement, revisions, and removals account for almost one-half of all VNS procedures. Our findings suggest important long-term expectations for VNS including expected complications, battery life, and other surgical issues. Review of the literature suggests that this is the first large review of VNS revisions by a single center. Our findings are important to better characterize long-term surgical expectations of VNS therapy. A significant portion of patients undergoing VNS therapy will eventually require revision.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document