The biasing effect of verbal labels on memory for ambiguous figures in patients with progressive dementia

1995 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 271-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arne L. Ostergaard ◽  
William C. Heindel ◽  
Jane S. Paulsen

AbstractThis experiment investigated the effects of verbal labels on recognition memory for ambiguous visual figures in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), patients with Huntington's disease (HD), and matched normal control subjects. The study employed ambiguous figures that could be interpreted in two different ways. During the study phase each figure was presented together with a verbal label that corresponded to one interpretation of the figure. After a 30-min retention interval a recognition memory test was given during which the study figures and distractor figures were presented one at a time without verbal labels. For each study figure two distractor figures were employed, each corresponding to a different interpretation of the study figure. The patients' overall recognition memory performance was severely impaired compared to control subjects. However, all subject groups tended to produce responses and response latencies to distractor items that were consistent with the verbal labels presented during the study phase. This bias effect occurred in the AD patients despite the fact that their recognition memory performance was at chance level. Indeed, there was no significant difference in the bias evidenced by the AD and HD patients and their respective matched control subjects. The bias effects were obtained in an explicit memory task, and the findings are discussed in terms of unconscious influences on explicit memory processes. (JINS, 1995, I, 271–280.)

1995 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 454-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramona O. Hopkins ◽  
Raymond P. Kesner ◽  
Michael Goldstein

AbstractHypoxia is known to cause damage to the hippocampus as well as memory impairments in humans. Subjects who have experienced a hypoxic episode and age-, gender-, and education-matched control subjects were tested for memory for spatial and linguistic temporal distance information using sentences and spatial locations. Each test contained a familiar component based on information that is meaningful and is thought to be stored as part of the knowledge system (prior knowledge) as well as a novel component based on new information. Subjects were presented a list of eight-word sentences or eight spatial locations (Xs) on a grid on a Macintosh computer and tested for memory for temporal distances. Temporal distance is defined as the number of items that occur between the two test items, in the study phase. Compared to control subjects, hypoxic subjects were impaired across all temporal distances on the novel spatial and linguistic tasks. As the temporal distance increased, hypoxic subjects showed some improvement in memory performance. In addition, memory of familiar temporal distance information was also assessed. Hypoxic subjects were impaired, compared to control subjects, for familiar temporal distance information. For hypoxic subjects there was a proportionally greater impairment for novel compared to familiar spatial and linguistic temporal distance information. There was a significant difference in their performance on the familiar temporal distance tasks compared to their performance on the novel tasks. Prior knowledge appears to attenuate the deficits seen in the familiar temporal distance tasks. It appears that hypoxia may cause more selective damage to the hippocampus and this damage is sufficient to produce profound memory impairments for primarily novel and less severe memory impairments for familiar spatial and linguistic temporal distance information. (JINS, 1995, I, 454–468.)


2020 ◽  
Vol 228 (4) ◽  
pp. 264-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan E. Mitton ◽  
Chris M. Fiacconi

Abstract. To date there has been relatively little research within the domain of metamemory that examines how individuals monitor their performance during memory tests, and whether the outcome of such monitoring informs subsequent memory predictions for novel items. In the current study, we sought to determine whether spontaneous monitoring of test performance can in fact help individuals better appreciate their memory abilities, and in turn shape future judgments of learning (JOLs). Specifically, in two experiments we examined recognition memory for visual images across three study-test cycles, each of which contained novel images. We found that across cycles, participants’ JOLs did in fact increase, reflecting metacognitive sensitivity to near-perfect levels of recognition memory performance. This finding suggests that individuals can and do monitor their test performance in the absence of explicit feedback, and further underscores the important role that test experience can play in shaping metacognitive evaluations of learning and remembering.


2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 763-781 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenni Heikkilä ◽  
Kimmo Alho ◽  
Kaisa Tiippana

Audiovisual semantic congruency during memory encoding has been shown to facilitate later recognition memory performance. However, it is still unclear whether this improvement is due to multisensory semantic congruency or just semantic congruencyper se. We investigated whether dual visual encoding facilitates recognition memory in the same way as audiovisual encoding. The participants memorized auditory or visual stimuli paired with a semantically congruent, incongruent or non-semantic stimulus in the same modality or in the other modality during encoding. Subsequent recognition memory performance was better when the stimulus was initially paired with a semantically congruent stimulus than when it was paired with a non-semantic stimulus. This congruency effect was observed with both audiovisual and dual visual stimuli. The present results indicate that not only multisensory but also unisensory semantically congruent stimuli can improve memory performance. Thus, the semantic congruency effect is not solely a multisensory phenomenon, as has been suggested previously.


2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (8) ◽  
pp. 1168-1182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura E. Matzen ◽  
Michael C. Trumbo ◽  
Michael J. Haass ◽  
Michael A. Hunter ◽  
Austin Silva ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document