The Neurological Predictor Scale Predicts Adaptive Functioning via Executive Dysfunction in Young Adult Survivors of Childhood Brain Tumor

Author(s):  
Rella J. Kautiainen ◽  
Michelle E. Fox ◽  
Tricia Z. King

Abstract Objectives: Survivors of childhood brain tumors experience neurological sequelae that disrupt everyday adaptive functioning (AF) skills. The Neurological Predictor Scale (NPS), a cumulative measure of tumor treatments and sequelae, predicts cognitive outcomes, but findings on its relation to informant-reported executive dysfunction (ED) and AF are mixed. Given known effects of frontal-subcortical system disruptions on AF, this study assessed the NPS’ relationship with AF as mediated by frontal systems dysfunction, measured by the Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (FrSBe). Methods: 75 participants (Mage = 23.5, SDage = 4.5) were young adult survivors of childhood brain tumors at least 5 years past diagnosis. FrSBe and Scales of Independent Behavior-Revised (SIB-R), a measure of AF, were administered to informants. Parallel multiple mediator models included Apathy and ED as mediators, and age at diagnosis and time between diagnosis and assessment as covariates. Results: More complex treatment and sequelae were correlated with poorer functioning. Mediation models were significant for all subscales: Motor Skills (MS), p = .0001; Social Communication (SC), p = .002; Personal Living (PL), p = .004; Community Living (CL), p = .007. The indirect effect of ED on SC and CL was significant; the indirect effect of Apathy was not significant for any subscales. Conclusions: More complex tumor treatment and sequelae were associated with poorer long-term AF via increased ED. Cognitive rehabilitation programs may focus on the role of executive function and initiation that contribute to AF, particularly SC and CL skills, to help survivors achieve comparable levels of independence in everyday function as their peers.

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 415-427
Author(s):  
Tiina Maria Remes ◽  
Maria Helena Suo-Palosaari ◽  
Päivi K T Koskenkorva ◽  
Anna K Sutela ◽  
Sanna-Maria Toiviainen-Salo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cranial radiotherapy may damage the cerebral vasculature. The aim of this study was to understand the prevalence and risk factors of cerebrovascular disease (CVD) and white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) in childhood brain tumors (CBT) survivors treated with radiotherapy. Methods Seventy CBT survivors who received radiotherapy were enrolled in a cross-sectional study at a median 20 years after radiotherapy cessation. The prevalence of and risk factors for CVD were investigated using MRI, MRA, and laboratory testing. Tumors, their treatment, and stroke-related data were retrieved from patients’ files. Results Forty-four individuals (63%) had CVD at a median age of 27 years (range, 16-43 years). The prevalence rates at 20 years for CVD, small-vessel disease, and large-vessel disease were 52%, 38%, and 16%, respectively. Ischemic infarcts were diagnosed in 6 survivors, and cerebral hemorrhage in 2. Lacunar infarcts were present in 7, periventricular or deep WMHs in 34 (49%), and mineralizing microangiopathy in 21 (30%) survivors. Multiple pathologies were detected in 44% of the participants, and most lesions were located in a high-dose radiation area. Higher blood pressure was associated with CVD and a presence of WMHs. Higher cholesterol levels increased the risk of ischemic infarcts and WMHs, and lower levels of high-density lipoprotein and higher waist circumference increased the risk of lacunar infarcts. Conclusions Treating CBTs with radiotherapy increases the risk of early CVD and WMHs in young adult survivors. These results suggest an urgent need for investigating CVD prevention in CBT patients.


2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 942-962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew C. Hocking ◽  
Wendy L. Hobbie ◽  
Janet A. Deatrick ◽  
Matthew S. Lucas ◽  
Margo M. Szabo ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 170-184

Purpose: To describe how adolescent and young adult survivors and their mother-caregivers ascribe meaning to their post–brain tumor survivorship experience, with a focus on sense making and benefit findings and intersections with religious engagement. Participants & Setting: Adolescent and young adult survivors of childhood brain tumors and their families, living in their community settings. Methodologic Approach: Secondary analysis of simultaneous and separate individual, semistructured interviews of the 40 matched dyads (80 total interviews) occurred using conventional content analysis across and within dyads. Meaning is interpreted through narrative profiles of expectations for function and independence. Findings: Participants made sense of the brain tumor diagnosis by finding benefits and nonbenefits unique to their experiences. Meaning was framed in either nonreligious or religious terms. Implications for Nursing: Acknowledging positive meaning alongside negative or neutral meaning could enhance interactions with survivors, caregivers, and their families. Exploring the meaning of their experiences may help them to reconstruct meaning and reframe post-tumor realities through being heard and validated.


2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy L. Hobbie ◽  
Sue Ogle ◽  
Maureen Reilly ◽  
Lamia Barakat ◽  
Matthew S. Lucas ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 804-811 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lamia P. Barakat ◽  
Yimei Li ◽  
Wendy L. Hobbie ◽  
Sue K. Ogle ◽  
Thomas Hardie ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 900-910 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark D. McCurdy ◽  
Elise M. Turner ◽  
Lamia P. Barakat ◽  
Wendy L. Hobbie ◽  
Janet A. Deatrick ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectives:Treatments for childhood brain tumors (BT) confer substantial risks to neurological development and contribute to neuropsychological deficits in young adulthood. Evidence suggests that individuals who experience more significant neurological insult may lack insight into their neurocognitive limitations. The present study compared survivor, mother, and performance-based estimates of executive functioning (EF), and their associations with treatment intensity history in a subsample of young adult survivors of childhood BTs.Methods:Thirty-four survivors (52.9% female), aged 18 to 30 years (M=23.5;SD=3.4), 16.1 years post-diagnosis (SD=5.9), were administered self-report and performance-based EF measures. Mothers also rated survivor EF skills. Survivors were classified by treatment intensity history into Minimal, Average/Moderate, or Intensive/Most-Intensive groups. Discrepancies among survivor, mother, and performance-based EF estimates were compared.Results:Survivor-reported and performance-based measures were not correlated, although significant associations were found between mother-reported and performance measures. Survivors in the Intensive/Most-Intensive treatment group evidenced the greatest score discrepancies, reporting less executive dysfunction relative to mother-reportedF(2,31)=7.81,p<.01, and performance-based measuresF(14,50)=2.54,p<.05. Conversely, survivors in the Minimal treatment group reported greater EF difficulties relative to motherst(8)=2.82,p<.05, but not performance-based estimates (ps>.05).Conclusions:There may be a lack of agreement among survivor, mother, and performance-based estimates of EF skills in young adult survivors of childhood BT, and these discrepancies may be associated with treatment intensity history. Neuropsychologists should use a multi-method, multi-reporter approach to assessment of EF in this population. Providers also should be aware of these discrepancies as they may be a barrier to intervention efforts. (JINS, 2016,22, 900–910)


Author(s):  
Marco Bonanno ◽  
Claude Julie Bourque ◽  
Jennifer Aramideh ◽  
Nancy Cloutier ◽  
Émilie Dumont ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document