scholarly journals Identification of the ribosome binding sites of translation initiation factor IF3 by multidimensional heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy

RNA ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARCO SETTE ◽  
ROBERTO SPURIO ◽  
PAUL VAN TILBORG ◽  
CLAUDIO O. GUALERZI ◽  
ROLF BOELENS
2006 ◽  
Vol 362 (4) ◽  
pp. 787-799 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrico Caserta ◽  
Jerneja Tomšic ◽  
Roberto Spurio ◽  
Anna La Teana ◽  
Cynthia L. Pon ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 352 (3) ◽  
pp. 851-857 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang Hoon LEE ◽  
Myung Hee PARK

Deoxyhypusine synthase catalyses the NAD-dependent transfer of the butylamine moiety from the polyamine, spermidine, to a specific lysine residue of a single cellular protein, eukaryotic translation-initiation factor 5A (eIF5A) precursor. The native enzyme exists as a tetramer of four identical subunits and contains four binding sites for NAD. The binding of spermidine and NAD was studied by a filtration assay. [3H]Spermidine binding to the enzyme was not detectable alone or in the presence of the eIF5A precursor, but was detected only in the presence of NAD or NADH, suggesting that a NAD/NADH-induced conformational change is required for the binding of spermidine. A strong NAD-dependent binding was also observed with a spermidine analogue, N1-guanyl-1,7-diamino[3H]heptane (GC7), but not with [14C]putrescine or [14C]spermine. Although [3H]NAD binding to the enzyme occurred in the absence of spermidine, its affinity for the enzyme was markedly enhanced by spermidine, GC7 and also by the eIF5A precursor. The maximum binding for NAD and spermidine was estimated to be ≈ 4 molecules each/enzyme tetramer. The dependence of spermidine binding on NAD and the modulation of binding of NAD by spermidine and the eIF5A precursor suggest intricate relationships between the binding of cofactor and the substrates, and provide new insights into the reaction mechanism.


2005 ◽  
Vol 280 (16) ◽  
pp. 16514-16521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evelyn Sattlegger ◽  
Alan G. Hinnebusch

The protein kinase GCN2 mediates translational control of gene expression in amino acid-starved cells by phosphorylating eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α. InSaccharomyces cerevisiae,activation of GCN2 by uncharged tRNAs in starved cells requires its direct interaction with both the GCN1·GCN20 regulatory complex and ribosomes. GCN1 also interacts with ribosomes in cell extracts, but it was unknown whether this activity is crucial for its ability to stimulate GCN2 function in starved cells. We describe point mutations in two conserved, noncontiguous segments of GCN1 that lead to reduced polyribosome association by GCN1·GCN20 in living cells without reducing GCN1 expression or its interaction with GCN20. Mutating both segments simultaneously produced a greater reduction in polyribosome binding by GCN1·GCN20 and a stronger decrease in eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α phosphorylation than did mutating in one segment alone. These findings provide strong evidence that ribosome binding by GCN1 is required for its role as a positive regulator of GCN2. A particular mutation in the GCN1 domain, related in sequence to translation elongation factor 3 (eEF3), decreased GCN2 activation much more than it reduced ribosome binding by GCN1. Hence, the eEF3-like domain appears to have an effector function in GCN2 activation. This conclusion supports the model that an eEF3-related activity of GCN1 influences occupancy of the ribosomal decoding site by uncharged tRNA in starved cells.


2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 2505-2511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birgit Märtens ◽  
Salim Manoharadas ◽  
David Hasenöhrl ◽  
Lukas Zeichen ◽  
Udo Bläsi

Abstract The translation initiation factor aIF2 of the crenarchaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus (Sso) recruits initiator tRNA to the ribosome and stabilizes mRNAs by binding via the γ-subunit to their 5′-triphosphate end. It has been hypothesized that the latter occurs predominantly during unfavorable growth conditions, and that aIF2 or aIF2-γ is released on relief of nutrient stress to enable in particular anew translation of leaderless mRNAs. As leaderless mRNAs are prevalent in Sso and aIF2-γ bound to the 5′-end of a leaderless RNA inhibited ribosome binding in vitro, we aimed at elucidating the mechanism underlying aIF2/aIF2-γ recycling from mRNAs. We have identified a protein termed Trf (translation recovery factor) that co-purified with trimeric aIF2 during outgrowth of cells from prolonged stationary phase. Subsequent in vitro studies revealed that Trf triggers the release of trimeric aIF2 from RNA, and that Trf directly interacts with the aIF2-γ subunit. The importance of Trf is further underscored by an impaired protein synthesis during outgrowth from stationary phase in a Sso trf deletion mutant.


1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 6940-6947 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Imataka ◽  
N Sonenberg

Mammalian translation initiation factor 4F (eIF4F) consists of three subunits, eIF4A, eIF4E, and eIF4G. eIF4G interacts directly with both eIF4A and eIF4E. The binding site for eIF4E is contained in the amino-terminal third of eIF4G, while the binding site for eIF4A was mapped to the carboxy-terminal third of the molecule. Here we show that human eIF4G possesses two separate eIF4A binding domains in the middle third (amino acids [aa] 478 to 883) and carboxy-terminal third (aa 884 to 1404) of the molecule. The amino acid sequence of the middle portion of eIF4G is well conserved between yeasts and humans. We show that mutations of conserved amino acid stretches in the middle domain abolish or reduce eIF4A binding as well as eIF3 binding. In addition, a separate and nonoverlapping eIF4A binding domain exists in the carboxy-terminal third (aa 1045 to 1404) of eIF4G, which is not present in yeast. The C-terminal two-thirds region (aa 457 to 1404) of eIF4G, containing both eIF4A binding sites, is required for stimulating translation. Neither one of the eIF4A binding domains alone activates translation. In contrast to eIF4G, human p97, a translation inhibitor with homology to eIF4G, binds eIF4A only through the amino-terminal proximal region, which is homologous to the middle domain of eIF4G.


1997 ◽  
Vol 266 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magali Moreau ◽  
Eve de Cock ◽  
Pierre-Louis Fortier ◽  
Carlos Garcia ◽  
zChristine Albaret ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ebelechukwu C. Nwokoye ◽  
Eiman AlNaseem ◽  
Robert A. Crawford ◽  
Lydia M. Castelli ◽  
Martin D. Jennings ◽  
...  

AbstractBy interacting with the mRNA 5′ cap, the translation initiation factor eIF4E plays a critical role in selecting mRNAs for protein synthesis in eukaryotic cells. Caf20 is a member of the family of proteins found across eukaryotes termed 4E-BPs, which compete with eIF4G for interaction with eIF4E. Caf20 independently interacts with ribosomes. Thus, Caf20 modulates the mRNA selection process via poorly understood mechanisms. Here we performed unbiased mutagenesis across Caf20 to characterise which regions of Caf20 are important for interaction with eIF4E and with ribosomes. Caf20 binding to eIF4E is entirely dependent on a canonical motif shared with other 4E-BPs. However, binding to ribosomes is weakened by mutations throughout the protein, suggesting an extended binding interface that partially overlaps with the eIF4E-interaction region. By using chemical crosslinking, we identify a potential ribosome interaction region on the ribosome surface that spans both small and large subunits and is close to a known interaction site of eIF3. The function of ribosome binding by Caf20 remains unclear.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document