scholarly journals SOME PROPERTIES OF ANALYTIC DIFFERENCE VALUED FIELDS

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 447-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvain Rideau
Keyword(s):  
Algebraic Closure ◽  
Quantifier Elimination ◽  
Order Theory ◽  
Analytic Structure ◽  
Independence Property ◽  
Valued Fields ◽  
First Order ◽  
Witt Vectors ◽  
First Order Theory

We prove field quantifier elimination for valued fields endowed with both an analytic structure that is $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}$-Henselian and an automorphism that is $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}$-Henselian. From this result we can deduce various Ax–Kochen–Eršov type results with respect to completeness and the independence property. The main example we are interested in is the field of Witt vectors on the algebraic closure of $\mathbb{F}_{p}$ endowed with its natural analytic structure and the lifting of the Frobenius. It turns out we can give a (reasonable) axiomatization of its first-order theory and that this theory does not have the independence property.

More on definable sets of p-adic numbers

1988 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 912-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Scowcroft
Keyword(s):  
Cross Section ◽  
Quantifier Elimination ◽  
Order Theory ◽  
Model Completeness ◽  
First Order ◽  
First Order Theory ◽  
Ordered Fields ◽  
Definable Sets ◽  
The Cross ◽  
Primitive Recursive

To eliminate quantifiers in the first-order theory of the p-adic field Qp, Ax and Kochen use a language containing a symbol for a cross-section map n → pn from the value group Z into Qp [1, pp. 48–49]. The primitive-recursive quantifier eliminations given by Cohen [2] and Weispfenning [10] also apply to a language mentioning the cross-section, but none of these authors seems entirely happy with his results. As Cohen says, “all the operations… introduced for our simple functions seem natural, with the possible exception of the map n → pn” [2, p. 146]. So all three authors show that various consequences of quantifier elimination—completeness, decidability, model-completeness—also hold for a theory of Qp not employing the cross-section [1, p. 453; 2, p. 146; 10, §4]. Macintyre directs a more specific complaint against the cross-section [5, p. 605]. Elementary formulae which use it can define infinite discrete subsets of Qp; yet infinite discrete subsets of R are not definable in the language of ordered fields, and so certain analogies between Qp and R suggested by previous model-theoretic work seem to break down.To avoid this problem, Macintyre gives up the cross-section and eliminates quantifiers in a theory of Qp written just in the usual language of fields supplemented by a predicate V for Qp's valuation ring and by predicates Pn for the sets of nth powers in Qp (for all n ≥ 2).

scholarly journals NIP FOR THE ASYMPTOTIC COUPLE OF THE FIELD OF LOGARITHMIC TRANSSERIES

2017 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALLEN GEHRET
Keyword(s):  
Order Theory ◽  
Exchange Property ◽  
Independence Property ◽  
First Order ◽  
Valued Field ◽  
First Order Theory ◽  
Order Language ◽  
Complete Survey ◽  
Image Position

AbstractThe derivation on the differential-valued field Tlog of logarithmic transseries induces on its value group ${{\rm{\Gamma }}_{{\rm{log}}}}$ a certain map ψ. The structure ${\rm{\Gamma }} = \left( {{{\rm{\Gamma }}_{{\rm{log}}}},\psi } \right)$ is a divisible asymptotic couple. In [7] we began a study of the first-order theory of $\left( {{{\rm{\Gamma }}_{{\rm{log}}}},\psi } \right)$ where, among other things, we proved that the theory $T_{{\rm{log}}} = Th\left( {{\rm{\Gamma }}_{{\rm{log}}} ,\psi } \right)$ has a universal axiomatization, is model complete and admits elimination of quantifiers (QE) in a natural first-order language. In that paper we posed the question whether Tlog has NIP (i.e., the Non-Independence Property). In this paper, we answer that question in the affirmative: Tlog does have NIP. Our method of proof relies on a complete survey of the 1-types of Tlog, which, in the presence of QE, is equivalent to a characterization of all simple extensions ${\rm{\Gamma }}\left\langle \alpha \right\rangle$ of ${\rm{\Gamma }}$. We also show that Tlog does not have the Steinitz exchange property and we weigh in on the relationship between models of Tlog and the so-called precontraction groups of [9].

scholarly journals Automated reasoning-alternative methods

2004 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 15-20
Author(s):  
Aleksandar Perovic ◽  
Nedeljko Stefanovic ◽  
Milos Milosevic ◽  
Dejan Ilic
Keyword(s):  
Automated Reasoning ◽  
Quantifier Elimination ◽  
Order Theory ◽  
Alternative Methods ◽  
Formal Representation ◽  
First Order ◽  
First Order Theory ◽  
Interpretation Method

Our main goal is to describe a potential usage of the interpretation method (i.e. formal representation of one first order theory into another) together with quantifier elimination procedures developed in the GIS.

scholarly journals Characterizations of monadic NIP

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (30) ◽  
pp. 948-970
Author(s):  
Samuel Braunfeld ◽  
Michael Laskowski
Keyword(s):  
Order Theory ◽  
Independence Property ◽  
Content Type ◽  
First Order ◽  
First Order Theory ◽  
Forbidden Configuration

We give several characterizations of when a complete first-order theory T T is monadically NIP, i.e. when expansions of T T by arbitrary unary predicates do not have the independence property. The central characterization is a condition on finite satisfiability of types. Other characterizations include decompositions of models, the behavior of indiscernibles, and a forbidden configuration. As an application, we prove non-structure results for hereditary classes of finite substructures of non-monadically NIP models that eliminate quantifiers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document