Development of a German version of the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool (CSNAT): The process of translation and cultural adaptation

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-198
Author(s):  
Christiane Kreyer ◽  
Johannes Bükki ◽  
Sabine Pleschberger
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Cognitive Testing ◽  
Support Needs ◽  
Family Carers ◽  
Palliative Home Care ◽  
Carer Support ◽  
German Speaking ◽  
Assessment Conversations

AbstractObjectiveThe Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool (CSNAT) was developed in the UK and has been shown to be effective to assess and address support needs of family carers of terminally ill patients at home. In German language, there is a lack of an evidence-based comprehensive assessment tool for family carers in palliative home care. The objectives of this study were to translate and develop a culturally adapted version of the CSNAT for a German-speaking context including the assessment of feasibility, face, and content validity.MethodA translation and validation study was conducted in three steps: (1) translation of CSNAT following International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research criteria; (2) cognitive testing in five German-speaking regions in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland with 15 family carers; and (3) pilot testing in palliative home care services. Evaluation was by telephone interviews with those involved in the assessments (family carers, health care professionals) and a focus group discussion with the health care professionals. Data were analyzed using content analysis.ResultsThe regional idiomatic variety raised challenges in the process of translation. Cognitive testing revealed semantic, conceptual, syntactic, and idiomatic issues. During the pilot, 25 assessment conversations were held. Carers reported that the German version called “KOMMA” was brief, easy to understand and to complete, and helpful. They appreciated that the items adequately addressed their support needs and reminded them of their own strengths and resources. Health care professionals observed good acceptance by carers, the expression of unexpected patterns of needs, and extensive assessment conversations, but some raised concerns that the assessment process might shift attention to carers’ needs at the cost of the patients.Significance of resultsA multi-step process of translation, cognitive testing, and pilot testing led to a culturally well-acceptable German tool (KOMMA). Comprehensibility, acceptance, face, and content validity, as well as feasibility were demonstrated.

14 Enabling tailored and coordinated support for family carers of people with motor neurone disease through adaptation of a carer support needs assessment tool (CSNAT) intervention

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 365.1-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gail Ewing ◽  
Sarah Croke ◽  
Christine Rowland ◽  
Gunn Grande
Keyword(s):  
Needs Assessment ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Motor Neurone ◽  
Motor Neurone Disease ◽  
Support Needs ◽  
List Type ◽  
Family Carers ◽  
Carer Support ◽  
Main Support ◽  
Stage 1

IntroductionFamily carers provide vital support for people with Motor Neurone Disease (MND) but caregiving can be very physically and mentally demanding. It is therefore crucial to ensure healthcare practitioners (HCPs) can provide timely support to carers fitting their individual needs. Currently there are no UK interventions for this.AimTo adapt an existing carer support needs assessment tool (CSNAT) intervention to support the needs and situation of family carers of people with MND.MethodsStages:Focus groups and interviews with 33 carers (14 bereaved 19 current carers) to capture support needs key points of change during patient’s illness and main support services.Workshops with HCPs (N=17 recruited to date) and carer advisors (N=19) to inform materials and procedures for MND carer assessment and support.ResultsStage 1: Carers’ experience was one of dealing with a devastating diagnosis a constantly changing situation with heavy dependence on them as carers and with little consideration of their separate support needs. Carers’ support needs mainly mapped onto CSNAT domains but MND carers may experience relationship issues warranting further consideration. Stage 2 will integrate HCP and carers’ views on when where how and by whom MND carer assessment and support should best be provided.ConclusionsFindings to be presented from Stages 1 and 2 will provide insights into how MND carers want to be assessed and supported. This will form the basis for an intervention to be tested in a future Stage 3 feasibility study.FunderMarie Curie Research Fund/Motor Neurone Disease Association

scholarly journals Reliability, validity and acceptability of the traditional Chinese version of the carer support needs assessment tool in Hong Kong palliative care settings

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui-Lin Cheng ◽  
Doris Yin Ping Leung ◽  
Po Shan Ko ◽  
Ming Wai Chung ◽  
Wai Man Lam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Needs Assessment ◽  
Caregiver Burden ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Chinese Version ◽  
Support Needs ◽  
Family Carers ◽  
Carer Support ◽  
Care Practices ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Background Among the few existing needs assessment tools for family carers, the 14-item Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool (CSNAT) is the only brief and holistic needs screening tool designed for everyday use in palliative care practices. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability, validity, and acceptability of the traditional Chinese version of the CSNAT in palliative care settings in Hong Kong. Methods This adopted a cross-sectional and correlation design with repeated measures. The participants were 125 family carers of palliative cancer patients and 10 healthcare providers (HCPs) that were recruited from two local hospitals. The evaluation of psychometric properties included the following: (1) content validity through HCPs including frontline physicians, nurses, social workers, and clinical psychologists; (2) construct validity between the CSNAT items and those of the validated tools that measured caregiver burden, social support, and caregiving self-efficacy; and (3) one-week test-retest reliability in a sub-sample of 81 caregivers. The acceptability of the tool was assessed by the carers using several closed-ended questions. Results The content validity index of the CSNAT at the scale level was 0.98. Each item of the CSNAT was significantly and moderately correlated with caregiver burden (Spearman’s r = 0.24 to 0.50) and caregiving self-efficacy (r = − 0.21 to − 0.52), but not for social support. All CSNAT items had fair to moderate test-retest reliability (weighted kappa = 0.21 to 0.48), with the exception of two items “managing your relatives’ symptoms, including giving medicines” and “having time for yourself in the day”. Regarding the acceptability of the CSNAT, almost all HCPs were willing to use the CSNAT for carer assessment and support. 89.6% of the carers demonstrated a comprehensibility of the CSNAT tool and 92.9% felt comfortable answering the questions. Around 90% of the carers agreed to use the tool for screening, discussing needs, and making referrals. Conclusion The traditional Chinese version of the CSNAT is a tool with high validity and acceptability and adequate reliability that measures family carers’ support needs, which should be considered for wide application in local palliative care practices.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document