Twinkle little stars: Massive stars are quenched in strong magnetic fields

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (A30) ◽  
pp. 118-118
Author(s):  
Fatemeh S. Tabatabaei ◽  
M. Almudena Prieto ◽  
Juan A. Fernández-Ontiveros

AbstractThe role of the magnetic fields in the formation and quenching of stars with different mass is unknown. We studied the energy balance and the star formation efficiency in a sample of molecular clouds in the central kpc region of NGC 1097, known to be highly magnetized. Combining the full polarization VLA/radio continuum observations with the HST/Hα, Paα and the SMA/CO lines observations, we separated the thermal and non-thermal synchrotron emission and compared the magnetic, turbulent, and thermal pressures. Most of the molecular clouds are magnetically supported against gravitational collapse needed to form cores of massive stars. The massive star formation efficiency of the clouds also drops with the magnetic field strength, while it is uncorrelated with turbulence (Tabatabaei et al. 2018). The inefficiency of the massive star formation and the low-mass stellar population in the center of NGC 1097 can be explained in the following steps: I) Magnetic fields supporting the molecular clouds prevent the collapse of gas to densities needed to form massive stars. II) These clouds can then be fragmented into smaller pieces due to e.g., stellar feedback, non-linear perturbations and instabilities leading to local, small-scale diffusion of the magnetic fields. III) Self-gravity overcomes and the smaller clouds seed the cores of the low-mass stars.

1991 ◽  
Vol 147 ◽  
pp. 391-393
Author(s):  
F. Bertoldi ◽  
C.F. McKee ◽  
R.I. Klein

The gravitational stability of molecular cloud clumps before and after the onset of massive star formation is discussed. We suggest that the most massive clumps are magnetically supercritical but gravitationally stabilized by the hydromagnetic turbulence caused by FUV photoionization-regulated low-mass star formation in their interiors. The ionizing radiation of an O star can trigger star formation in initially sub- and supercritical clumps.


1991 ◽  
Vol 147 ◽  
pp. 391-393
Author(s):  
F. Bertoldi ◽  
C.F. McKee ◽  
R.I. Klein

The gravitational stability of molecular cloud clumps before and after the onset of massive star formation is discussed. We suggest that the most massive clumps are magnetically supercritical but gravitationally stabilized by the hydromagnetic turbulence caused by FUV photoionization-regulated low-mass star formation in their interiors. The ionizing radiation of an O star can trigger star formation in initially sub- and supercritical clumps.


2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (S270) ◽  
pp. 57-64
Author(s):  
Ian A. Bonnell ◽  
Rowan J Smith

AbstractThere has been considerable progress in our understanding of how massive stars form but still much confusion as to why they form. Recent work from several sources has shown that the formation of massive stars through disc accretion, possibly aided by gravitational and Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities is a viable mechanism. Stellar mergers, on the other hand, are unlikely to occur in any but the most massive clusters and hence should not be a primary avenue for massive star formation. In contrast to this success, we are still uncertain as to how the mass that forms a massive star is accumulated. there are two possible mechanisms including the collapse of massive prestellar cores and competitive accretion in clusters. At present, there are theoretical and observational question marks as to the existence of high-mass prestellar cores. theoretically, such objects should fragment before they can attain a relaxed, centrally condensed and high-mass state necessary to form massive stars. Numerical simulations including cluster formation, feedback and magnetic fields have not found such objects but instead point to the continued accretion in a cluster potential as the primary mechanism to form high-mass stars. Feedback and magnetic fields act to slow the star formation process and will reduce the efficiencies from a purely dynamical collapse but otherwise appear to not significantly alter the process.


2018 ◽  
Vol 483 (4) ◽  
pp. 4893-4900 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathaniel Dylan Kee ◽  
Rolf Kuiper

Abstract Radiative feedback from luminous, massive stars during their formation is a key process in moderating accretion on to the stellar object. In the prior papers in this series, we showed that one form such feedback takes is UV line-driven disc ablation. Extending on this study, we now constrain the strength of this effect in the parameter range of star and disc properties appropriate to forming massive stars. Simulations show that ablation rate depends strongly on stellar parameters, but that this dependence can be parameterized as a nearly constant, fixed enhancement over the wind mass-loss rate, allowing us to predict the rate of disc ablation for massive (proto)stars as a function of stellar mass and metallicity. By comparing this to predicted accretion rates, we conclude that ablation is a strong feedback effect for very massive (proto)stars which should be considered in future studies of massive star formation.


1996 ◽  
Vol 157 ◽  
pp. 256-258
Author(s):  
Wim van Driel ◽  
Bert van den Broek

AbstractWe studied a statistically complete sample of 57 southern socalled extreme IRAS galaxies, i.e., objects with a high far-infrared/blue luminosity ratio, LFIR/LB>3, using optical (imaging and spectra), radio continuum, and CO(1–0) line observations. The sample can be divided into three distinct categories: dwarfs (20%), barred spirals (35%), and interacting systems (35%). The barred galaxies are generally morphologically undisturbed, isolated systems, with average star formation rates (4 M⊙ yr–1) and efficiencies (LFIR/MH2 = 16 L⊙/M⊙) for galaxies in our sample. An enhanced massive star formation rate is the cause of the infrared brightness in 93% of all galaxies in the sample. The nuclear region is the most important star formation locus, generally unresolved at 1" resolution, i.e., less than 0.2-0.6 kpc size (H0=75 km s–1 Mpc–1), though 2 kpc size in three cases. In about two-thirds of the extreme IRAS SB’s, fainter, diffuse (2.5-10 kpc size) massive star formation is seen in the bar as well.


1986 ◽  
Vol 116 ◽  
pp. 523-528
Author(s):  
J. A. Graham ◽  
Taft E. Armandroff

Highlights of the IAU Symposium 116 are reviewed. Some of the general themes running through the meeting are identified. These include:i) the fruitful interaction between observation, laboratory work and theory. ii) the need for understanding and, if possible, correcting for the effects of incompleteness and bias in observing lists. iii) the importance of the Magellanic Clouds, as the nearest independently evolving stellar systems, in the study of massive star formation and evolution in galaxies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 488 (2) ◽  
pp. 2970-2975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Y Grudić ◽  
Philip F Hopkins

Abstract Most simulations of galaxies and massive giant molecular clouds (GMCs) cannot explicitly resolve the formation (or predict the main-sequence masses) of individual stars. So they must use some prescription for the amount of feedback from an assumed population of massive stars (e.g. sampling the initial mass function, IMF). We perform a methods study of simulations of a star-forming GMC with stellar feedback from UV radiation, varying only the prescription for determining the luminosity of each stellar mass element formed (according to different IMF sampling schemes). We show that different prescriptions can lead to widely varying (factor of ∼3) star formation efficiencies (on GMC scales) even though the average mass-to-light ratios agree. Discreteness of sources is important: radiative feedback from fewer, more-luminous sources has a greater effect for a given total luminosity. These differences can dominate over other, more widely recognized differences between similar literature GMC-scale studies (e.g. numerical methods, cloud initial conditions, presence of magnetic fields). Moreover the differences in these methods are not purely numerical: some make different implicit assumptions about the nature of massive star formation, and this remains deeply uncertain in star formation theory.


Nature ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 416 (6876) ◽  
pp. 59-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher F. McKee ◽  
Jonathan C. Tan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document